Re: (RADIATOR) Question about group

Hello Jason - On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Jason Kao wrote: > After reading Radiator radius server manual and searching the FAQ and mail > archives, I still can not get the clear picture. My question is > > If I am planning to use group in order to reply different reply items for > different group, do

(RADIATOR) Question about group

After reading Radiator radius server manual and searching the FAQ and mail archives, I still can not get the clear picture. My question is If I am planning to use group in order to reply different reply items for different group, do I have to use AuthBy Unix which in turn will use /etc/group fi

Re: (RADIATOR) new Radiator functionality

Hi Rob, On Nov 17, 9:28am, Rob Thomas wrote: > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) new Radiator functionality > Hugh Irvine wrote: > > [...] > > > You might also look at using StripFromReply together with AddToReply, which may > > do what you require. (sections 6.14.6 and 6.14.7 in the Radiator 2.14.1 manu

Re: (RADIATOR) new Radiator functionality

Hello Rob - On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Rob Thomas wrote: > Hugh Irvine wrote: > > [...] > > > You might also look at using StripFromReply together with AddToReply, which may > > do what you require. (sections 6.14.6 and 6.14.7 in the Radiator 2.14.1 manual). > > I've actually been thinking about wh

Re: (RADIATOR) new Radiator functionality

Hugh Irvine wrote: [...] > You might also look at using StripFromReply together with AddToReply, which may > do what you require. (sections 6.14.6 and 6.14.7 in the Radiator 2.14.1 manual). I've actually been thinking about whacking some code in, something like 'AddIfNotPresent'.. I actually pu

Re: (RADIATOR) new Radiator functionality

Hello Leon - On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, leon wrote: > Dear people, > > I do not know if this is the right place to mention this, I do not even > know if you guys are interested in this kind of stuff. Anyhow after some > problems with our portwholesale customers I made some small > modifications to t

Re: (RADIATOR) Dictionary Doubt

Hello Guilherme - On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Guilherme Maranhão wrote: > Hi, > > I'm logging all connections on a MSSQL server. But i'm trying to log the > integer value instead of the text associated with him in the dictionary > file. My ideal was to comment the VALUE lines of the dictionary file. >

Re: (RADIATOR) ARGH!!!!! (problem solved with static ip not working)

Hello Jay - On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Jay West wrote: > It took me a long time to isolate the problem I was having with reply > attributes not being passed back to the NAS. Finally after a decent nights > sleep, basic troubleshooting with radpwtst and (eek!) reading the manual, > the problem was foun

Re: (RADIATOR) Problem with the Framed Address modulo 254

Hello Antonio - On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Antonio Navarro Navarro wrote: > Hi all ! > > I have defined the field FramedGroupBaseAddress in the section of my >radiator.cfg file, and FramedGroup 0 in the Section. The lines are like >this: > > > >FramedGroupBaseAddress 212.87.203.1 >

Re: (RADIATOR) Help on AuthBy Group

Hello Tom - On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Tom Gwilt wrote: > > Our users file contains the following: > DEFAULT Auth-Type=System > Service-Type = Framed-User, > Framed-Protocol = PPP, > Ascend-Base-Channel-Count = 1, > Ascend-Maximum-Channels = 1 > > My question is twofold: > > What is the format

(RADIATOR) new Radiator functionality

Dear people, I do not know if this is the right place to mention this, I do not even know if you guys are interested in this kind of stuff. Anyhow after some problems with our portwholesale customers I made some small modifications to the Radiator package. I've added the keyword: PrependToReply

Re: (RADIATOR) problem with Simultaneous-Use

> Again: Simultaneous-Use is a check item, not a reply item. > The reply item you want to use is "Port-Limit = 1". > > Now a question to the sophisticated part of the audience: > how does the Port-Limit apply in a multi-chassis situation ? As Port-Limit is a reply item, it's up to the NAS to keep

(RADIATOR) ARGH!!!!! (problem solved with static ip not working)

It took me a long time to isolate the problem I was having with reply attributes not being passed back to the NAS. Finally after a decent nights sleep, basic troubleshooting with radpwtst and (eek!) reading the manual, the problem was found. I was using the sample common-sql.cfg and sql.cfg in th

(RADIATOR) Dictionary Doubt

Hi, I'm logging all connections on a MSSQL server. But i'm trying to log the integer value instead of the text associated with him in the dictionary file. My ideal was to comment the VALUE lines of the dictionary file. Will it work? If not, does anybody have any hint? E.G.: Original Dictionary

(RADIATOR) Problem with the Framed Address modulo 254

Hi all ! I have defined the field FramedGroupBaseAddress in the section of my radiator.cfg file, and FramedGroup 0 in the Section. The lines are like this: FramedGroupBaseAddress 212.87.203.1 FramedGroup 0 . When a user gets connected and the NAS Port is under 254,

(RADIATOR) Help on AuthBy Group

Hi, We are an ISP using Radiator. I'm sure you can all sleep better at night knowing that . We would like to set up a couple of AuthBy Group clauses to prevent authentication for disconnect non-pays, and vacation accounts. Our radius.cfg file contains the following: #

Re: (RADIATOR) Authenticating off of Platypus

> 2) use FreeTDS and DBD-Sybase - when I tried this > it was an exciting mix of linking alpha software with alpha software :) It's > probably much better now. There are *two* freetds. One is what most would consider to be FreeTDS, as featured at http://www.freetds.org, an

Re: (RADIATOR) problems with authby SQL and authby FILE with ContinueWhileAccept

Hello Jay - On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, Jay West wrote: > You wrote > > I suspect the routers in question are Cisco's? If so, then you will need a > > Service-Type = Framed-User as a Reply attribute. Your current definition > for > > DEFAULT has it only as a check item. Try this: > > > > DEFAULT Se