original-
> De: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: martes 20 de marzo de 2001 1:00
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: IMPORTANT - Re: (RADIATOR) Performance with RADIATOR
>
>
>
> Hello Julio -
>
> On Tuesday 20 Mar
yes, the same lan, the same machine, the same switch.
regards,
jules
-Mensaje original-
De: Andy De Petter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: martes 20 de marzo de 2001 17:04
Para: Radiator Mailing
Asunto: RE: (RADIATOR) Performance with RADIATOR
Owh, and are your database server
ling
> Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Performance with RADIATOR
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: dinsdag 20 maart 2001 13:43
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROT
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: dinsdag 20 maart 2001 13:43
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Performance with RADIATOR
>
>
> We try to do s
ript and improve performance?
Hugh: Do you remember the changes to MySQL to obtain 80 r/s ?
regards,
jules
-Mensaje original-
De: Ingvar Berg (ERA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: martes 20 de marzo de 2001 12:27
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: RE: (RADIATOR) Performance with RADI
radpwtst (and on a separate box, of course :)
DS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 20 mars 2001 10:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IMPORTANT - Re: (RADIATOR) Performance with RADIATOR
hi all,
first, thanks to all for
during this day and the
canges we made.
regards,
jules
-Mensaje original-
De: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: martes 20 de marzo de 2001 1:00
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: IMPORTANT - Re: (RADIATOR) Performance with RADIATOR
by mail.krameria.net with asmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
id 14fFPV-0001Of-00; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 07:14:25 +0100
From: "Andy De Petter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steve Roderick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Radiator Mailing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subje
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: maandag 19 maart 2001 20:19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Performance with RADIATOR
>
>
> At 04:01
At 08:18 PM 3/19/2001 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>We have gotten over 500 requests per second from Radiator when hitting it
>with multiple clients. We can do over 200 from a single client.
>
>Are you including accounting in your requests or are you purely looking at
>auths?
>We send complete
Hello Julio -
On Tuesday 20 March 2001 02:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we need to decide which radius server will upgrade our AAA plattform. Our
> final choice is between Radiator and BSAC.
>
> A feature-table has been elaborated and checked during the last months. The
> last check
At 04:01 PM 3/19/2001 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The results are:
>
>- BSAC finished in 7 sec.
>- Radiator finished in 23 sec.
>
>We launch Radiator with "Trace -1" and monitoring it, we noticed that
almost
>all the time the peak of requests per second is 30.
We have gotten over 500 reques
At 04:01 PM 3/19/2001 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The results are:
>
>- BSAC finished in 7 sec.
>- Radiator finished in 23 sec.
>
>We launch Radiator with "Trace -1" and monitoring it, we noticed that almost
>all the time the peak of requests per second is 30.
We have gotten over 500 reques
13 matches
Mail list logo
