[RBW] Re: Rivendell Road Standard from 1996

2009-06-17 Thread Jan-Olov Jansson
Hi I am using Tektro Oryx but I was shifting the spacers from inner to outer place, othervise I think some Paul V-brakes works. And also put the brakespads at top of the slot in the brakearms. I have ridden since 2006 with 650B on my 53 cm Atlantis instead for 559 wheelset. Olle > > Olle, I ha

[RBW] Re: Rivendell Road Standard from 1996

2009-06-17 Thread Jim Cloud
Hi Carl, The frame size is 65 cm, and the stem length is 120mm. The Nitto Campee rear rack works perfectly with the GB799 panniers. they're designed to fit on a rack with tapering side supports (like the racks that are sometimes built by custom frame builders which are mounted on the fender). T

[RBW] Re: Rivendell Road Standard from 1996

2009-06-17 Thread Bruce
re on the 26 side. You might have the opposite experience. From: Thomas Nezovich To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 7:16:11 AM Subject: [RBW] Re: Rivendell Road Standard from 1996 Olle, I have been experimenting with 650b w

[RBW] Re: Rivendell Road Standard from 1996

2009-06-17 Thread Thomas Nezovich
Olle, I have been experimenting with 650b wheels with my 56cm Atlantis (uses 559 wheels) but have had some trouble finding brakes to work (among those I already own). What did you use to reach up to the larger rims? Tom Nezovich Cleveland, OH On Jun 17, 2009, at 4:56 AM, olle wrote: > > H

[RBW] Re: Rivendell Road Standard from 1996

2009-06-17 Thread olle
Hi Jim Nice Rivendell, it reminds my Heron Touring. pictures: http://tinyurl.com/n3l76e and some pic of my Rivendell and Atlantis Olle > > > > Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:22:33 -0700 > > Subject: [RBW] Rivendell Road Standard from 1996 > > From: cloud...@aol.com > > To: rbw-owners-bunch@googl

[RBW] Re: Rivendell Road Standard from 1996

2009-06-17 Thread Carl Otto Wollin
Hello Jim Thank you for posting those inspiring pictures. What is the size of the frame and what is the length of the stem? How is the Nitto Campee works with Berthoud panniers. I´m curios to know because I´m in the porocess of building my dream touring bike in same tradition. Regards Carl

[RBW] Re: Rivendell Road Standard from 1996

2009-06-16 Thread David Estes
I see a Rivendell, particularly a "correctly built" one (not one built for low profile brakes) and presume it has gone through a few forms of metamorphosis! Looks like yours has turned out pretty spot on! David On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Jim Cloud wrote: > > Hi David, > > Actually, this

[RBW] Re: Rivendell Road Standard from 1996

2009-06-16 Thread Jim Cloud
Hi Michael, Thanks for your comment! The fenders definitely keep the bike cleaner. I've used a handlebar bag for quite a number of years on various bikes, without experiencing any handling problems (none of my bikes were low-trail). On a handlebar bag as big as the GB2886 I think I'll try to a

[RBW] Re: Rivendell Road Standard from 1996

2009-06-16 Thread Jim Cloud
Hi David, Actually, this is the only the second major iteration. I originally had the bicycle equipped with a component selection that was roughly comparable to the one that was used on the old Bicycle Guide test bike (from 1996). A mix of Suntour drive components (both Superbe Pro and Cyclone)

[RBW] Re: Rivendell Road Standard from 1996

2009-06-16 Thread MichaelH
Truly a beautiful bike, Jim. I think the fenders look great, but I'm biased since I run the same fenders on my Ram, with 28 mm tires. I would suppose fenders are rare in Tucson, but I'd bet they keep the bike a lot cleaner. How do you like the bag? Are you tempted to put too much weight int

[RBW] Re: Rivendell Road Standard from 1996

2009-06-16 Thread David Estes
Looks purpose built! How many iterations has it gone through before the current set up? DE On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Jim Cloud wrote: > > I added some photographs of my Rivendell Road Standard from 1996 to > the flickr photosharing website (Rivendell Group) and I thought I'd > post a me