Hi Robert.
>> b: a: [a 1 b 2]
== [a 1 b 2]
>> same? a b
== true
>> a: b: "xyz"
== "xyz"
>> d: c: reduce [a b]
== ["xyz" "xyz"]
>> same? d c
== true
Robert M. Münch wrote:
>On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:33:29 +1000, Anton Rolls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>
>
>>Use SAME?
>>
>>a: b: [123]
>>sa
> Is there supposed to be a special symbol here?
> (Not just "DM" ?)
> I don't see it here in Outlook.
There's only "DM" there.
Did you see the special Euro character? It's like a curly capital "e".
Andrew J Martin
Attendance Officer
Speaking in tongues and performing miracles
Colenso High Scho
Is there supposed to be a special symbol here?
(Not just "DM" ?)
I don't see it here in Outlook.
Anton.
> German Mark: 123.456,00 DM
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
It would seem Carl's Cookbook entry "Strong Authentication Method" could
serve as a useful example in this instance.
http://www.rebol.net/cookbook/recipes/0019.html
Ted
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 4:30 PM
Subje
Carlos:
> Is it secure to pass a checksum/secure value on a URL
> I mean when GET method is used on CGI?
Checksum/secure is proof against reverse engineering (given
#{DE187642E6C75F60D10F29E52CAB54CDF676870D} you'd have a hard job working it backwards
to the
original string).
But it isn't
the reason for this, is that it protects you from the sysadmin himself.
even he can't scan your password (unless he runs a mega-loop hashing and comparing all
possible strings against the stored one) which can take hours, days or weeks to break.
Which is why you should use long passwords on se
Hi, Robert,
Robert M. Münch wrote:
>
> Hi, ahhh forgot about this one. Rebol just has to many words to remember
> ;-) But this doesn't seem to work for nested blocks:
>
Sure it does!
>
>>>d: reduce [a b]
>>
> == [[a 1 b 2] [a 1 b 2]]
>
>>>e: reduce [a b]
>>
> == [[a 1 b 2] [a 1 b 2]]
>
>>
Andreas, Maarten
Is it secure to pass a checksum/secure value on a URL
I mean when GET method is used on CGI?
Carlos
Em Ter 21 Out 2003 17:10, Andreas Bolka escreveu:
> Tuesday, October 21, 2003, 8:42:31 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > Considering the following code, how can I get :pwd back in plain
> >
Robert M. Münch wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:33:29 +1000, Anton Rolls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Use SAME?
>>
>>a: b: [123]
>>same? a b
>>;== true
>
>
> Hi, ahhh forgot about this one. Rebol just has to many words to remember
> ;-) But this doesn't seem to work for nested blocks
Joel,
I got it.
That's exactly what I was looking for.
The impossibility of getting back what was
passed to checksum makes it ideal for login routines
Thanks
Carlos
Em Ter 21 Out 2003 17:11, Joel Neely escreveu:
> Hi, Carlos,
>
> You can't. See below.
>
> Carlos Lorenz wrote:
> > Considering th
Hi, Carlos,
You can't. See below.
Carlos Lorenz wrote:
>
> Considering the following code, how can I get
> :pwd back in plain English?
>
>>>write %password.txt checksum/secure pwd
>>
>
>>>pwd: read %password.txt
>>
>
> == "ç'ÑFJá$6è§&Ú[/^QØ8^[&"
>
Check the help for CHECKSUM:
>> ? che
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:50:35 +1300, A J Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> a/5..10
I like this one. Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:44:30 +1000, Brett Handley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can sort of, but you may not want to :-)
>
>>> test: ["Bug Report" 1]
> == ["Bug Report" 1]
>>> key: "Bug Report"
> == "Bug Report"
>>> do reduce [to-set-path reduce ['test :key] 1 + test/:key]
> == ["Bug Report"
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:30:54 +1000, Anton Rolls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Oh, I see what you're trying to do.
> I agree there seems to be missing a
> native to set the selected value.
Hi, yes correct that's the problem.
> We have SELECT to get the value, but
> we have nothing to set the val
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:33:29 +1000, Anton Rolls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Use SAME?
>
> a: b: [123]
> same? a b
> ;== true
Hi, ahhh forgot about this one. Rebol just has to many words to remember
;-) But this doesn't seem to work for nested blocks:
>> a: [a 1 b 2]
== [a 1 b 2]
>> b: [a 1 b
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:50:54 +1000, Brett Handley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Just looking up the public bug tracking system... oops we don't have
>>> one!
> ...
> I also don't see it being a good way to record bug type information.
Hi Brett, if you can hold for a few days than you (and oth
Hi Matt,
I never had used Rebol to get e-mail delivery confirmation, but I have made
a rule using procmail that adds the header "Disposition-Notification-To:"
and it makes this function.
Hope that helps.
Julio Cesar Santana
At 14:22 21/10/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>Does anyone know how to send
You can't. Checksumming (hashing) is a one-way operation
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Carlos Lorenz
> Sent: dinsdag 21 oktober 2003 20:43
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] reading back checksum/secure
>
>
> Hello list,
Tuesday, October 21, 2003, 8:42:31 PM, Carlos wrote:
> Considering the following code, how can I get :pwd back in plain
> English?
>>> pwd: ask "Enter password: "
> Enter password: mypass
> == "mypass"
>>> write %password.txt checksum/secure pwd
>>> pwd: read %password.txt
> == "ç'ÑFJá$6è§
Hello list,
Considering the following code, how can I get
:pwd back in plain English?
>> pwd: ask "Enter password: "
Enter password: mypass
== "mypass"
>> write %password.txt checksum/secure pwd
>> pwd: read %password.txt
== "ç'ÑFJá$6è§&Ú[/^QØ8^[&"
Thanks
Carlos Lorenz
--
To unsubscr
Do you mean system/options/cgi/query-string ?
Carlos
Em Ter 21 Out 2003 16:15, martin mauchauffee escreveu:
> sorry for my english
> a search for an equal fonctionality of $QUERY_STRING in PHP
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the su
Does anyone know how to send an email through rebol and request a delivery
confirmation for it? I know that the tag that tells the email client is
embedded in the data section of the email, but I'm not really sure how to
manually insert that into a REBOL email.
Matt
_
sorry for my english
a search for an equal fonctionality of $QUERY_STRING in PHP
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
* Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031021 08:52]:
>
I think that the concept of data-driven code needs to
be explored further. Hey Carl, you're the one who
wrote it! :-) New paradigm!
tj
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesda
Andrew,
Rebol's Currency datatype will accept the following format:
>> EUR$123'456,00
== EUR$123456.00
Bohdan "Bo" Lechnowsky
Lechnowsky Technical Consulting
At 10:12 PM 10/21/03 +1300, you wrote:
>Can people living in Europe or Germany confirm whether these formats for
>currency look right,
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 12:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: Building an Associate List from a string
>
>
>
> Hello REBOLS:
>
> Think Item #4 in the Designers Tip Sheet:
> "Data Drives It
Hello REBOLS:
Thanks for all of the input. Andrew and I got into an
OTL thread, which I'll soon route back to the list.
FYI: I'm toying with an idea. I have already developed
an object approach with uses data structures to generate
'ML code (Andrew's 'ML dialect). It's still in beta (gamma
really)
Hi, Brett,
Actually, you remind me of another point which I failed to raise...
Brett Handley wrote:
>
> ... result encourages one to use a form that has the least effect
> on the "parent/calling expression" - whether you evaluate the
> condition early eg:
> condition-result: dummy = 1
>
Hi Andrew,
here comes some info from a German. There might be some official
guidelines where to put the euro-sign in a currency format, but in real
life it doesn't matter if it is in front or behind the amount. Important
is the "." as delimiter for thousands and "," as decimal delimiter.
Sometim
Andrew,
Here in Brazil the currency notation is just like
in Europe, except for the money sign i.e. R$ 125.456,00
Carlos
Em Ter 21 Out 2003 07:12, A J Martin escreveu:
> Can people living in Europe or Germany confirm whether these formats for
> currency look right, please?
>
> Euro: 123.456,00
Andrew:
>
> Euro: 123.456,00 €
> German Mark: 123.456,00 DM
> US Dollar: $123,456.00
The euro (always supposed to be lowercase and singular as in "I bought six
sheep and five fish for ten euro" -- although that doesn't happen in practice)
should precede the amount: €123.456,00 with no spac
Hi,
I live in France.
1) I see no reason for putting a point at the "thousand" delimiter:
$123,456.00 = 123456.00 € (more or less ;o) ) you can perhaps swap the
dot with a comma (depending of Europe areas)
2) The German Mark doesn't exist anymore... (think € !) So I see no
point for REBOL as a
Can people living in Europe or Germany confirm whether these formats for
currency look right, please?
Euro: 123.456,00 €
German Mark: 123.456,00 DM
US Dollar: $123,456.00
Unfortunately, Rebol doesn't yet understand the above formats:
>> 123.456,00€
** Syntax Error: Invalid decimal -- 123.456,00€
I am interested and I appreciated help from Colin, Pat, or others. The best
may be to just send me questions (or suggestions) and I will try to
incorporate the answers to the text. Other approaches are possible too.
TIA
-L
> ...and these articles are very valuable even sometimes
> (at least for
On 21-Oct-03, Tom Conlin wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Tim Johnson wrote:
>> Hello REBOLS:
>> I need some advice :-)
>> I've written a function that converts a delimited string into
>> an associative list.
>> Code and example console session is below:
>> ;; =
On 21-Oct-03, Tim Johnson wrote:
> Hello REBOLS:
> I need some advice :-)
> I've written a function that converts a delimited string into an
> associative list.
> Code and example console session is below: ;;
> =
> make-al: function[ {Bu
36 matches
Mail list logo
