Hi Ashley,
Glad to get some feedback ;)
>
> A couple of questions first.
>
> 1. Does RUn work at the UI or console level (ie. can it drive an
> "encapped" script)?
No. It's able to run raw REBOL scripts.
> 2. Is it capable of driving reasonably complex VID interfaces?
If the creation of y
Thanks to all who responded, I finally ended up using bits of each posted
solution to derive the following:
b: 'a
do has [a] compose [set (to-lit-word b) 0]
So simple in hind-sight! ;)
Regards,
Ashley
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PRO
>
> It certainly was not my intent to start a browser war. It is strange to
> me the way people turn computer brands into a religion; to me it's just
> another tool. I don't hear of people getting their backs up over someone
> preferring Craftsman over Stanley yet in the computer world... oh we
From: Ashley Trüter
Given the following:
>> b: 'a
== a
>> do has [a][set 'a 0]
== 0
>> a
** Script Error: a has no value
** Near: a
>> do has [a][do compose/deep [set [(b)] 0]]
== 0
>> a
== 0
How can I prevent 'compose from binding to the global context?
Hi, Ashley,
I'm not an expert on b
Hi,
> > A path cannot start with "/".
>
>On linux it does.
> tj
A file! path can start with "/" also in Rebol:
%/home/http/run/cohen/birds ;== %/home/http/run/cohen/birds
and you can also do:
home: %/home
home/http/run/cohen/birds ;== %/home/http/run/cohen/birds
---
Ciao
Romano
--
* Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040421 12:38]:
>
> After writing my last mail and reading other posts... I realized that
>
> /a/b/c/d is an illusion.
>
>
> when it gets loaded, it ALWAYS becomes:
>
> /a /b /c /d even if reduce is not called on it.
>
>
> >> probe [/a/b/c]
> >>
After writing my last mail and reading other posts... I realized that
/a/b/c/d is an illusion.
when it gets loaded, it ALWAYS becomes:
/a /b /c /d even if reduce is not called on it.
>> probe [/a/b/c]
>> [/a /b /c]
probe [[[/a/b/c]]]
[[[/a /b /c]]]
Like Hallvard just noted, chained ref
Hi Tim,
TJ> (again my opinion):
TJ> a call to type? should either return a
TJ> valid type name or throw some kind
TJ> of an exception.
It does. See Joel's example:
>> reduce [type? /home/http/run/cohen/birds]
== [refinement! /http /run /cohen /birds]
You mentioned that on Linux,
Dixit Tim Johnson (21.45 21.04.2004):
> (again my opinion):
>a call to type? should either return a
>valid type name or throw some kind
>of an exception.
Oh, but it does! But on the original line, there was
type? /home/http/run/cohen/birds
Rebol evaluates through the line, but prints
> > length? [/home/http/run/cohen/birds] ;== 5
> >
> > while a path like this gives:
> >
> > length? [home/http/run/cohen/birds] ;== 1
> >
> > A path cannot start with "/".
>
>
> But it should return invalid data or refinement!
I meant and invalid data ERROR...
cause doing:
>> typ
Dixit Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch (21.19 21.04.2004):
>But it should return invalid data or refinement!
Should it?
>> a:/ ; url!
== a:/
>> # ; issue!
== #
>> ; tag!
==
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; email!
== [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rebol doesn't always check your input for validity. When you pass something to
* Gregg Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040421 11:37]:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> >>> type? /home/http/run/cohen/birds
> TJ> == /birds
> TJ> /birds is obviously not a type.
>
> TYPE? is looking at /home, and seeing it as a refinement! value. Then
> the others are all refinements as well, and you see the value
* Romano Paolo Tenca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040421 11:25]:
>
> Hi.
>
> > this is weird:
> >
> > >> type? /home/http/run/cohen/birds
> > == /birds
> >
> > /birds is obviously not a type.
> >
> > What is happening here?
>
>
> It is happening that your are writing a line of code like this:
>
>
Hello, all...
Consider this:
>> reduce [type? /home/http/run/cohen/birds]
== [refinement! /http /run /cohen /birds]
So each element of the path-looking thingie is treated as a distinct
value, and what gets printed is the last one, just as in
>> type? 1 2 3 4
== 4
Hope this helps!
-jn-
Hal
Hi Tim,
>>> type? /home/http/run/cohen/birds
TJ> == /birds
TJ> /birds is obviously not a type.
TYPE? is looking at /home, and seeing it as a refinement! value. Then
the others are all refinements as well, and you see the value of the
last one returned.
>> reduce [ /home/http/run/cohen/birds]
==
Hi Tim,
You start with a /, and for some reason, that is recognized as a refinement!, not a
path!.
>> type? /home
== refinement!
refinements are (like?) a data type:
>> /home
== /home
But I do agree that type? /home/http/run/cohen/birds should not return /birds.
HY
Dixit Tim Johnson (20.29 2
>
> It is happening that your are writing a line of code like this:
>
> type? /home /http /run /cohen /birds
>
> the "/" starts a refinement! word that ends at the next "/"
> where starts
> another refinement! word.
> the last refinement (/birds) is returned at the end of the evaluation:
Hi.
> this is weird:
>
> >> type? /home/http/run/cohen/birds
> == /birds
>
> /birds is obviously not a type.
>
> What is happening here?
It is happening that your are writing a line of code like this:
type? /home /http /run /cohen /birds
the "/" starts a refinement! word that ends at the
I believe if you put some address info on the front end like:
>> type? C:/home/http/run/cohen/birds
== url!
Or
>> type? http://www.someaddress.com/home/http/run/cohen/birds
== url!
you'll get what your looking for.
HTH;
Paul
--
Linux User Number: 348867
>
> this is weird:
>
>>> type? /ho
Dixit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (20.41 21.04.2004):
>I guess there should be an error try on that
>do-browser right?
Good idea, although I've never had any problems.
HY
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The plugin module for MSIE is cool. And
>with the javascript access to the browser's
>DOM
>tree, interesting thi
this is weird:
>> type? /home/http/run/cohen/birds
== /birds
/birds is obviously not a type.
What is happening here?
thanks
tim
--
Tim Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsu
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your posts! It's good for us to get "a view from the
outside" when new people come in. Please do use this list as a
resource to help you in your work with REBOL. We all learn when people
ask questions here.
Your post inspired me to write a bit here, if you'll bear with me, an
and your point, in regards to Rebol is??
>
>
> http://www.sys-con.com/story/?
storyid=44354&DE=1
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list, just send
an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe
as the subject.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTE
I guess there should be an error try on that
do-browser right?
>
> Hi,
>
> The plugin module for MSIE is cool. And
with the javascript access to the browser's
DOM
tree, interesting things can be done.
>
> I've added a feature to the rix search
engine: plug the scripts in directly. So if
yo
Hi Ashley,
...
>How can I prevent 'compose from binding to the global context?
>
>
>
you can't, because Compose doesn't do any binding. Here is one way,
where Has is allowed to do the binding, but I don't know whether this is
the one you need:
b: 'a
do has [a] compose/deep [do
As far as application development goes I'm given pretty much free rain.
The only edict set in stone is that anything that is developed must be
cross platform complient; Windows-to-Linux, Linux-to-Windows. Most of my
work is PHP/MySQL so that edict doesn't effect me to any great extent.
I initial
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The point is mute, I don't make the rules and the rule for us is no MSIE;
>this is the only "fact" I need.
>
>Paul
>
>
Well, "I need" - that is correct of course, but others may have another
needs I can expect such large company has pretty much their
development
Hi Ashley,
On Wednesday, April 21, 2004, 4:07:28 PM, you wrote:
>>> b: 'a
AT> == a
>>> do has [a][set 'a 0]
AT> == 0
>>> a
AT> ** Script Error: a has no value
AT> ** Near: a
>>> do has [a][do compose/deep [set [(b)] 0]]
AT> == 0
>>> a
AT> == 0
AT> How can I prevent 'compose from binding to the
The point is mute, I don't make the rules and the rule for us is no MSIE;
this is the only "fact" I need.
Paul
--
Linux User Number: 348867
> Paul - your company is probably very well protected by strong
> architecture (firewalls, VPNs, IDS systems, strict user policies,
> probably limited web
Given the following:
>> b: 'a
== a
>> do has [a][set 'a 0]
== 0
>> a
** Script Error: a has no value
** Near: a
>> do has [a][do compose/deep [set [(b)] 0]]
== 0
>> a
== 0
How can I prevent 'compose from binding to the global context?
Regards,
Ashley
--
To unsubscribe from this list,
> If there a sufficient interest, I could translate the doc (actually
> about 16 pages) into English.
>
> Let me know, guys ;-)
A couple of questions first.
1. Does RUn work at the UI or console level (ie. can it drive an
"encapped" script)?
2. Is it capable of driving reasonably complex VID i
Paul Tretter wrote:
>We all want to see development on other browsers as well. However, we had
>this discussion on the REBOL/View world and it was quite obvious that most
>agreed that RT's efforts are better spent on other projects for now. As for
>the IE problem your company experienced, we ha
> Are you new here? :-)
Yes I am new, so new that I'm still trying to figure out exactly what
Rebol is and how I can best capitalize on it's unique features.
> According to some ppl Mozilla simply does not work
> properly, nor does 50% of Flash work :-)
That's interesting. I can only speak of
Hi list,
As we were experimenting with eXtreme Programming (http://www.xprogramming.com is a
good starting point), we found out that this methodology suits perfectly with the
development of rather large projects in REBOL, such as those we're concerned about (ie
Psychotechnical Assessment).
We
We all want to see development on other browsers as well. However, we had
this discussion on the REBOL/View world and it was quite obvious that most
agreed that RT's efforts are better spent on other projects for now. As for
the IE problem your company experienced, we have indications that IE Is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>The plugin module for MSIE is cool. And with the javascript access to the
>>browser's DOM tree, interesting things can be done.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Yes it is cool but MSIE is such a security sive that my company, and a
>growing list of others, have banned the use of IE. I
> The plugin module for MSIE is cool. And with the javascript access to the
> browser's DOM tree, interesting things can be done.
>
Yes it is cool but MSIE is such a security sive that my company, and a
growing list of others, have banned the use of IE. I would really like to
see development of
[REBOL] [REBOL.org] Recent changes
This is an automatic email from REBOL.org, the REBOL Script Library to notify you of
recent changes to the Library.
===changes===
liquid.r
--change: new script
--title: liquid.r - data flow management
--owners: moliad
--author: Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch
--p
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44354&DE=1
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
http://www.dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/images/dilbert2004043050217.gif
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
http://www.itworld.com/nl/ebiz_ent/04132004/
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
41 matches
Mail list logo
