Brian Wilson wrote:
> To set up a tiny REBOL system, it would be easiest to start with a tiny
> distribution, like one designed for embedded systems or the LRP (Linux
> Router Project).
Linux From Scratch is even better, but to use that you do need to know your
way around Linux with only the m
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And beware most Linux distributions these days anyways. They LIKE
> to install a LOT of stuff now. I'm not looking for a debate here -
A default Redhat 7.2 install forced me to use a min. 2 GB /usr partition.
Mandrake ships code compiled for a 586
'... *shrugs* Just warning.
Ok...OK..
It's just that there is a lot of people who know DOS and have access to it,
MS-DOS or FreeDOS.I can't seem tp find my CP/M disks ;-)
>From: Brian Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Ok...OK..
It's just that there is a lot of people who know DOS and have access to it,
MS-DOS or FreeDOS.I can't seem tp find my CP/M disks ;-)
>From: Brian Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [REBOL] Re: W
Heh. I don't think a DOS version of View would be necessary at all. I mean, while
I love Windows (that's right, you heard me: I LOVE Windows!!), sometimes I just feel
at home in a console. Course, I've been using various personal computers for about 18
years now (and I'm only 24..), sinc
I think DOS has a small footprint because it lacks features that would
allow REBOL to run, like a reliable network stack and multitasking.
Shake the dust off the PC and run linux on it, it should be fine. I
ran linux for years on a 486 w/ 16MB and a 250 MB hd.
Hey, but what about this old Kaypr
rick falls wrote:
> Hey why not a DOS version of REBOL. With the small footprint of REBOl core I
> could dust off and make use of my old 486PC. And REBOl is way easier than
> Qbasic.
I know that DOS is easier to use than Linux, but well, it is 16bit. And ... I
can hardly imagine RT would put t
rick falls wrote:
>
>
> Hey why not a DOS version of REBOL. With the small footprint of REBOl
> core I could dust off and make use of my old 486PC. And REBOl is way
> easier than Qbasic.
Why not use a cut down linux distro and use one of the linux versions of REBOL?
Chris
--
.--{ htt
