[REBOL] Re: footer on Joel's email

2002-03-19 Thread Charles
Since the REBOL interpreter is supposed to ignore everything above the header I didn't actually need the semicolon. I left it there as a hint, since I *do* need comment-escaped code later on. An experienced REBOL programmer would know that it wasn't needed, so that

[REBOL] Re: footer on Joel's email

2002-03-19 Thread Charles
snipsnip In Joel's program, an empty issue identifier is simply passed on without action or assignment. Clear as mud? --Scott Jones Once I thought about it, it occurred to me what was going on. REBOL would just output the last evaluation anyways. Such as: a: 5 hi == hi or hi == hi

[REBOL] Re: footer on Joel's email

2002-03-19 Thread Joel Neely
Hi, Charles, Charles wrote: There is, of course, the point that if one were to copy paste the sig into the console (which is what I did), then the comment /is/ required, and the REBOL [] does nothing special. And a good point it is, too! octothorp? I've never heard that term

[REBOL] Re: footer on Joel's email

2002-03-19 Thread Charles
From _The_Elements_of_Typographic_Style_ by Robert Bringhurst, a standard refererence in the field of typography... I thought typography was the study of errors during typing. Hmm... ;) octothorp Otherwise known a the numeral sign. It has also been used as a symbol

[REBOL] Re: footer on Joel's email

2002-03-18 Thread Charles
Hi, Adrian, Copy-and-paste it into your REBOL console (if you're willing to trust me! ;-) or into a file that you can DO from the REBOL console. Alternately, you can run that same file in Perl. Oh. The mystery commented portion is Perl... that makes sense, now. Hmm... Little

[REBOL] Re: footer on Joel's email

2002-03-18 Thread Hallvard Ystad
Dixit Charles (07.33 18.03.2002): Oh. The mystery commented portion is Perl... that makes sense, now. Hmm... Little question, though. WTF does # do, precisely? It appears to be a comment character for Perl (yes?), but when I try to help or source it, I get told it's an issue. But I can do

[REBOL] Re: footer on Joel's email

2002-03-18 Thread G. Scott Jones
From: Charles To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:33 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: footer on Joel's email ... Oh. The mystery commented portion is Perl... that makes sense, now. Hmm... Little question, though. WTF does # do, precisely? It appears to be a comment character

[REBOL] Re: footer on Joel's email

2002-03-18 Thread Joel Neely
Hi, Charles, OK, here are my deep dark secrets... Charles wrote: Oh. The mystery commented portion is Perl... that makes sense, now. Hmm... The point of the sig is to allow someone to discover my email address without placing it in clear text, thus making it just a little harder for

[REBOL] Re: footer on Joel's email

2002-03-16 Thread Joel Neely
Hi, Adrian, Copy-and-paste it into your REBOL console (if you're willing to trust me! ;-) or into a file that you can DO from the REBOL console. Alternately, you can run that same file in Perl. The goofy looking string at the end is just an anti-spam encoding of my email address. The rest of

[REBOL] Re: footer on Joel's email

2002-03-16 Thread Ronald Gruss
Bonjour Adrian, Saturday, March 16, 2002, 3:25:50 AM, vous avez écrit: A I can`t figure it out, can you explain? A ; sub REBOL {}; sub head ($) {@_[0]} A REBOL [] A # despam: func [e] [replace replace/all e : . # @] A ; sub despam {my ($e) = @_; $e =~ tr/:#/.@/; return \n$e} A print head