On Sunday, 02 June 2002, Peter Bowen wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 20:03, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Hello, list.
> > Is there any possibility of seeing gcc3-3.1 packages in 7.3?
> > 7.2 had gcc3, why 7.3 doesn't? For now, 7.3 users are stuck
> > with gcc3-
Hello, list.
Is there any possibility of seeing gcc3-3.1 packages in 7.3?
7.2 had gcc3, why 7.3 doesn't? For now, 7.3 users are stuck
with gcc3-3.0.4 from 7.2 updates...
Or am I dreaming too much and all this is not worth filing
a RFE in bugzilla?
--
"The Universe doesn't give you any points for
On Friday, 22 March 2002, Oliver Schulze L. wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't this should be a common topic,
> but I could't find info in redhat.com about
> where to upload contrib .rpm files?
>
> I think in the past was: ftp://incoming.redhat.com/
>
> Anyone know?
For now, you could use Bero's unofficial
On Tuesday, 19 March 2002, John Summerfield wrote:
> > Hello list.
> > I made a package of an anti-virus program but I can't decide where
> > to place its virus definitions database files. It doesn't have its own
> > directory structure, so I have to place all files manually.
> > The virus db file
Hello list.
I made a package of an anti-virus program but I can't decide where
to place its virus definitions database files. It doesn't have its own
directory structure, so I have to place all files manually.
The virus db files are 'shareable', so according to FHS they should be in
/usr/share/. B
On Wednesday, 06 March 2002, jian yang wrote:
[snip]
> One difference I know of is the version of j2sdk, the
> one on RedHat6.1 is j2sdk-1.2.2, the one on
> windows machine is j2sdk-1.3.
> Could the j2sdk version difference cause the
> application to run slower ? or any other ideas ?
Yes.
On Sunday, 03 March 2002, Kevin Ford wrote:
> Dmoinik;
>
> Here is the URL for wu-ftpd
>
> ftp://ftp.wu-ftpd.org/pub/wu-ftpd/wu-ftpd-2.6.2.tar.gz
I know this one. That's not what's in the current RawHide RPM.
> URL in spec file should be:
>
> ftp://ftp.wu-ftpd.org/pub/wu-ftpd/%{name}-%{versio
Hello, list.
I'm wondering where you (RedHat developers) get the source tarball
for this package, because there's no URL in the specfile.
Also I noticed that the tarball in wu-ftpd-2.6.2-3.src.rpm contains
two .src.rpms in wu-ftpd/src directory! Hence its size.
I made a patch to correct many compi
On Monday, 05 November 2001, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Monday 05 Nov 2001 10:18 am, bero wrote:
> [michel@aurora michel]$ rpm -q postfix
> postfix-20011008-1pcreSASL
> This version is missing all the documentations.
>
> Thanks for maintaining Postfix - and all those daily builds at linux
czwartek, 25 październik 2001, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer napisał(a):
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote:
>
> > Here it is:
> > http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/faq.html#5.1
>
> I knew that one - I didn't know what really caused their problems.
Yes, I
czwartek, 25 październik 2001, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer napisał(a):
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Alex Kanavin wrote:
>
> > By the way, it was me who fixed that mmx bug in mplayer, the only known
> > ACTUAL problem with 2.96 (oh, and gcc 3.0 also has it, but that does not
> > fit their "2.96 is buggy" the
czwartek, 25 październik 2001, Alex Kanavin napisał(a):
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote:
>
> > Confirmed, I've had no problems with any mplayer version starting
> > from 0.18pre3 to current CVS version, compiled with optimizations
> > either for At
On Thursday, 11 October 2001, Matt Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:16:03AM +0200, Martin Ma?ok wrote:
> > =
> >
> > http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/
> > ...
> > Appendix D - Known bugs
> > ...
> > * No image (black image) in RGB 15/16bpp (x11,dga,fbdev,svga) playing MPEG or
> > Open
Dhanashri P wrote:
> Hi ,
> I am using RHL 7.0 and g++ 2.96 . When using cout
> within child threads , the program hangs at cout .
Works for me. gcc-2.96-81 (from seawolf).
--
"You're the type of guy who doesn't like to give up control."
-- Wade to Garibaldi in Babylon 5:"The Exercise
Cristian Paslaru wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Is DivX;) really at all usable yet?
>
> Yes, you can try:
> ftp://crys.dntis.ro/pub/linux/redhat/6.X/RPMS/i386/avifile-0.6.3-1.6x.i386.rpm
>
> Its a snapshot from CVS on 2001-04-19, not a release version.
> Work very w
John Summerfield wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > What version of kernel headers is current rawhide glibc-2.2.2-7 built
> > with?
>
> Ask it:
> [listreader@dugite listreader]$ rpm -q glibc-devel --requires
> /sbin/install-info
> kernel-headers
> kernel-headers >= 2.2.1
> /bin/sh
I did ju
Hello list,
there is a thread on guinness-list going on now regarding this issue,
but I feel it is more on topic here, so I'll ask my question here:
What version of kernel headers is current rawhide glibc-2.2.2-7 built
with? On ftp.task.gda.pl rawhide mirror there is no kernel-headers
package:
nc
Trond Eivind Glomsrřd wrote:
> Dominik Mierzejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> > Specifically, I have built many packages for myself based on RH spec
> > files but using new versions of software, for example:
> >
> > postfix-20010222
> > tin-1.
Hello list
How do I submit such things to RedHat developers?
Specifically, I have built many packages for myself based on RH spec
files but using new versions of software, for example:
postfix-20010222
tin-1.5.8
I know there is contrib.redhat.com, but only non-distribution packages
should go th
John Summerfield wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > all i'm saying is that it would be easier for me to find and report
> > bugs if there was a changelog for it (like ftp://
> > ftp.conectiva.com.br/pub/conectiva/beta/misc/ChangeLog).
>
> Rawhide's not a beta and it's not a release.
Of c
Akos Szabo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just probe to compile openmotif-2.1.30-6 from powertools 7.0, but I got
> some error messages like this:
> In file included from main.c:44:
> def.h:150: conflicting types for `getline'
> /usr/include/bits/stdio.h:102: previous declaration of `getline'
> make[3]: ***
21 matches
Mail list logo
