hi,
this error always come:
-
rpm -Uvh textutils-2.0.21-1.i386.rpm sh-utils-2.0.11-13.i386.rpm cups-1.1.14-11
i386.rpm gimp-print-cups-4.2.0-7.i386.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
1:cups ###
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Levente Farkas wrote:
>
> > rpm -Fvh kernel-2*.i686.rpm glibc-2*.i686.rpm \
> > `ls kernel-*.rpm glibc-*.rpm|egrep -v "kernel-2|glibc-2"`
> > rpm -Fvh *.rpm
> >
> > since it at least in th
hi,
it seems almost impossible to catch a snap of rawhide when it is consistent.
a very stupid but useful check would be useful for those who put these files
to the mirror site, just run the following two lines on stock rh 7.2 (this
means all rpm instqalled from rh 7.2 except those which are excl
Jag wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Levente Farkas wrote:
>
> > it'd be useful to create a new mailing list for rahide
>
> THere is one. And not only that, you sent that mailing list requesting
> its existance. From
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat
hi,
there are more problems with postfix in rawhide with the rpm scripts.
first of all if the postfix user already exists than the install or
upgrade failed. than if I delete the postfix user for /etc/passwd:
# rpm -Uvh postfix-1.1.2-3.i386.rpm
Preparing...
hi,
we buy a new ASUS CUR-DLS motherboard with LSI 1010-33 scsi chipset. we
try to
install red hat linux 7.2, 7.0 on it. but the install always fail. the
installer
(anaconda) recognize it and use the proper sym53c8xx kernel modul for this
disk, although during the install kernel boot there are
hi,
it'd be useful to add eclipse to the distro. it seems to me as one of the
best candidate for IDE on linux (except KDeveloper:-), since it's real
multiplatform and well designed (may be we have to wait for the C/C++
plug-in).
www.eclipse.org
--
Levente "Si vis
hi,
after upgrading to 7.2 the following probles occur:
--
# rpm -K /mnt/download/mirror/redhat/7.2/RedHat/RPMS/vnc-3.3.3r2-18.i386.rpm
/mnt/download/mirror/redhat/7.2/RedHat/RPMS/vnc-3.3.3r2-18.i386.rpm: md5 gpg OK
# rpm -Uvh /mnt/download/mirror/redhat/7.2/RedHat/RPMS/vn
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>
> > The rpm was built on a pre-7.2 snapshot because 7.2 wasn't released at the
> > time it was built, and I'll build a new package (built on real 7.2) today.
>
> Done.
:-)) so a simple question: is it possibl
Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 11:21:54AM +0100, Levente Farkas wrote:
> > libcrypt.so.1 <-
>
> The naming's can be confusing, but libcrypt is part of glibc.
hmm, so I point to the wrong line :-( but it&#x
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Levente Farkas wrote:
>
> > Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Levente Farkas wrote:
> > >
> > > > hi,
> > > > this&#
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Levente Farkas wrote:
>
> > hi,
> > this's a quote from http://www.redhat.com/software/linux/rhl_server.html :
> > --
> > Mail server Sendmail, Postfix, Exim, WU IMA
> > ---
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Levente Farkas wrote:
>
> > hi,
> > this's a quote from http://www.redhat.com/software/linux/rhl_server.html :
> > --
> > Mail server Sendmail, Postfix, Exim, WU IMA
> > ---
hi,
this's a quote from http://www.redhat.com/software/linux/rhl_server.html :
--
Mail server Sendmail, Postfix, Exim, WU IMA
--
so where can I find this postfix? since it's not included in the main distro,
there is no powertools available for 7.2 and rawhide's post
t it, but that's not really the bottleneck.
>
> -Mark Gordon
>
> On 19 Apr 2001 09:52:39 +0200, Levente Farkas wrote:
> > hi,
> > it'd be useful to release a new red-carpet which can recognize rh 7.1 too.
> > I'd be easy to upgrade since it can use the same rp
hi,
is it possible to upload something to the contrib as in the "old days" ?
-- Leventehttp://petition.eurolinux.org/index_html
"The only thing worse than not knowing the truth is
ruining the bliss of ignorance."
___
Redha
John Summerfield wrote:
>
> I have a code fragment:
> struct group *grp = getgrnam(group.data());
you have to use group.c_str() since .data() doesn't have a \0 terminator.
-- Leventehttp://petition.eurolinux.org/index_html
"The only thing worse than not
Matt Wilson wrote:
>
> It is because we cannot ship a JDK without licensing problems.
> Shipping a JRE on powertools may be an option if there is some other
> part of powertools that needs a JRE.
there are some package in the powertools which are not needed by any other
packages:-) and even jre
hi,
on my rh 7.0 with latest rawhide kernel, I've got two problems.
on startup the kernel can't find ppp modul, of cource since there is no
ppp modul in 2.4, but there is a group of ppp modules so it'd be useful
if ppp install some new line into modules.conf. anyway I attached the
debian default
Alan Shutko wrote:
>
> Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Way too many use "everything" - anyway, it's a policy not to have such
> > > conflicts in the main. Everything can be installed at once, if you
> > > really want
> > when it is requested by many (ok what does it mean "many") people that
> > put it into (at least) preview.
>
> I don't think we'll disable it unless some really good reason shows
> up...
disable what ?
> > > They conflict, which isn't acceptable for the core components. Thus,
> > > postfix
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > but (as always) I prefer freedom and the chance for choice. that's what
> > I realy request from rh (and waiting for it). if there is more jurnaling fs
> > than give _me_
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> Dax Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Bernhard Rosenkraenzer said once upon a time (Tue, 16 Jan 2001):
> >
> > > It isn't - it's what we're doing (at least until at least one of the
> > > journalling FSes is really ready for prime time).
> >
> > I predict
Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> Dax Kelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > In the preview directory on the 2nd RH7 cdrom, there is a kernel 2.4
> > optimized RPM of glibc. Since the release of RH7.0, there have been a
> > couple errata updates of glibc. Can a kernel 2.4 optimized version of
> > glibc
John Summerfield wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > is "rpm -e linuxconf" here.
>
> You too?
like everybody, who rather edit an ascii file in /etc that destroy all
readable config files...
-- Leventehttp://petition.eurolinux.org/index_html
"The only thing worse th
Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > the followning simple code can prodcuce non-gnu both on red hat 6.2 and
> > 7.0 (with the default gcc) at the same time with the latest cvs gcc
> > it's print gnu. what is the
hi,
the followning simple code can prodcuce non-gnu both on red hat 6.2 and
7.0 (with the default gcc) at the same time with the latest cvs gcc
it's print gnu. what is the difference and how can I force gcc to
define _GNU_SOURCE (-D_GNU_SOURCE seems to be a solution but I don't
know whether is t
hi,
the pthread_mutexattr_setkind_np function declaration missing from pthread.h
although it's been included in /usr/lib/libpthread.{a,so} both on RH 6.2
(glibc-devel-2.1.3) and 7.0 (glibc-devel-2.1.94) what's more there is a
man page for this function (may be some other functions are also missin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > > hi,
> > > first of all I don't know the overall quality of 7.0 since I'm just come
> > > back from my vacation, but I read many mails and news about in which
> > > people are criticize red hat why they include gcc 2.96 in 7.0.
> >
> > gcc 2.96 is a development
hi,
first of all I don't know the overall quality of 7.0 since I'm just come
back from my vacation, but I read many mails and news about in which
people are criticize red hat why they include gcc 2.96 in 7.0.
it seems to me in the last few years that there are just a few people
who are using c++
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm currently using the gcc that comes with RH 6.1. It did not
> recognize the std::vector.at(int idx) call, had to use
> std::vector[int idx] instead. Has the .at function been
> implemented in a later edition of gcc?
with everything other stan
PLEASE! stop this thread!
yes, man is not the best, info is not the best, we need something better.
but we haven't and until somebody do that AND convert everything to that
we have to use our current tools.
amen.
-- Levente http://petition.eurolinux.org/
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> >> >I think it would be a good idea that binary packages (built with rpm) to
> >> >automagically include the spec file (and to place it under
> >> >/usr/doc/package.../). This is helpfull in 2 situations:
> >> > - as an
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
> I think I see the problem more properly now. You want the .spec
> file from a particular .src.rpm package, and you don't want to
> have to download that entire package. That makes sense. Putting
> it in the binary RPMS for your installed programs is NOT the
> correct s
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Viorel Anghel wrote:
>
> >I think it would be a good idea that binary packages (built with rpm) to
> >automagically include the spec file (and to place it under
> >/usr/doc/package.../). This is helpfull in 2 situations:
> > - as an inspiration fo
hi,
what I really would like to see in rh 7.0 is a bit smarter updater.
I see that the updater are getting better and better so after an upgrade
almost everything working (just have to find rpmsave and rpmnew), but
one thing which always wrong is some daemon not suuported by rh. the main
problem e
hi,
after I spending many days try to build a gcc rpm (since I hate install
anything from tar ball (or make install)) which contains the
latest snapshot of gcc with stdc++-v3 (ie. the latest standard c++ library)
it seems I'll give up. so here is my summary.
what I find
http://www.codesourcery.c
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Levente Farkas wrote:
>
> > hi,
> > I'd welcome a binutils-2.10 under the rawhide directory:-)
>
> There is one (2.10.0.9 actually). ;)
hmm. I can't access to ftp.redhat.com (since it's always
hi,
I'd welcome a binutils-2.10 under the rawhide directory:-)
-- Levente
"The only thing worse than not knowing the truth is
ruining the bliss of ignorance."
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman
hi,
thank you for tha latest kernel updates which finally contain the
latest (1.07) epic100 ethernet diver (even the 2.2.14-12 contain one
from 98). and as I wrote it in the 6.0 days it's crash on 100Mb with
high network load while the new (from 2/10/98) 1.06 is not. so now
we don't have to rem
Quoting "Prasanth A. Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I don't know if anyone has ever tried Webmin but I can say it is much
> more user friendly and less intrusive than Linuxconf. I think Redhat
> should seriously look at replacing Linuxconf with Webmin. I guess the
> most serious limitation to W
hi,
it'd be nice to see in the updates directory since it was big problem
for many people.
http://www.freshmeat.net/news/2000/04/26/956756732.html
-- lfarkas
"The only thing worse than not knowing the truth is
ruining the bliss of ignorance."
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL P
hi,
have you see this :
http://pages.infinit.net/lotus1/opendocs/book.htm
(or
http://packetstorm.securify.com/papers/unix/Securing-Optimizing-RH-Linux-1_2.pdf)
it's amazing and worth to read for everybody. may be most of them are known
(but I'm sure it contains some new info), it's a real big wor
hi,
first of all the files:
/etc/iproute2/rt_dsfield
/etc/iproute2/rt_protos
/etc/iproute2/rt_realms
/etc/iproute2/rt_scopes
/etc/iproute2/rt_tables
missing from iproute and in this case ip don't know the names of
the tables (and other constants protocols...).
why contain the old egcs ??? and not
John Summerfield wrote:
>
> > actually, you can change the default behavior of dmesg to see all of the boot
> > messages if you so desire... man dmesg for more nfo.
> As others have observed, even if it did, logging in is hardly the epitome
> of convenience. If the messages stayed there, I could
Alan Cox wrote:
> > but id does have enough to brag about. As it's proven technology (comes
> > from AIX and is also used on OS/2) I expect the work to be done reasonably
> > quickly.
>
> Work maybe, but its not proven until it works for a while under load under
> Linux. That will take time. ext3
hi,
in apache (both 1.3.9-8 and 1.3.9-4) in httpd.conf the line
ServerRoot /etc/httpd
is AFTER the apache module sections and in this case apache try to
find the modules in /usr/modules/ even if there is a link in
/etc/httpd/modules -> ../../usr/lib/apache/
yours.
-- Levente
"The only thing wor
47 matches
Mail list logo
