Re: The comment in latest Kernel Traffic

2001-01-05 Thread John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: True. We should all switch to Windows... ;-) Responses like the above are so weird and surprising. What can you be thinking when you make statements like that? Or are you just reacting, without thinking? It's fairly clear that a good number of people are in fact

Re: The comment in latest Kernel Traffic

2001-01-04 Thread Lars Nordin
On Thursday 04 January 2001 11:40, you wrote: The only public developer mailing list suitable for actual Red Hat development, for example, tends to stay fairly low traffic and off-topic. I could be a little off here or just tired but I've always thought of this list for those

Re: The comment in latest Kernel Traffic

2001-01-04 Thread John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Ok, most of the people who read Kernel Traffic, have already seen this, but I think this comment of Zack Brown in Issue #100 is worth repeating here: So Zack Brown's an expert on how Red Hat should do its business? Seems to me that RH has got one or two things

Re: The comment in latest Kernel Traffic

2001-01-04 Thread Mario Torre
On Thursday 04 January 2001 19:18, John Summerfield wrote: So Zack Brown's an expert on how Red Hat should do its business? I don't think the question could be answered only in this way... The fact that RedHat it's colser that Debian or the other distros is true. That's not necessarily bad.

Re: The comment in latest Kernel Traffic

2001-01-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
Mario Torre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: But RedHat doesn't want from anyone to contribute to its distro. We don't? That's the first I've heard of it. Bill ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: The comment in latest Kernel Traffic

2001-01-04 Thread Thornton Prime
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Bill Nottingham wrote: Mario Torre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: But RedHat doesn't want from anyone to contribute to its distro. We don't? That's the first I've heard of it. What is the current status of the contrib program. I haven't heard anything from the mailing

Re: The comment in latest Kernel Traffic

2001-01-04 Thread Matt Wilson
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 12:48:36PM -0800, Thornton Prime wrote: I'm not disputing your claim though Bill. I think RedHat is very proactive about getting developer import by making rawhide available and having a public bugzilla. I would like to see the contrib program resurrected and made

Re: The comment in latest Kernel Traffic

2001-01-04 Thread zbrown
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:18:39AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Ok, most of the people who read Kernel Traffic, have already seen this, but I think this comment of Zack Brown in Issue #100 is worth repeating here: So Zack Brown's an expert on how Red Hat

Re: The comment in latest Kernel Traffic

2001-01-04 Thread zbrown
I posted my last message before seeing this one... On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:55:36PM -0500, Matt Wilson wrote: What I'd like to encourage is for people to come to redhat-devel-list to make comments, suggestions, complaints, and even patches to the core Red Hat Linux distribution. If you

Re: The comment in latest Kernel Traffic

2001-01-04 Thread Christopher Abbey
Yesterday, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:55:36PM -0500, Matt Wilson wrote: What I'd like to encourage is for people to come to redhat-devel-list to make comments, suggestions, complaints, and even patches to the core Red Hat Linux distribution. If you have a pet