Unless you are using a laptop system, you do not need kernel-pcmcia-cs
installed.
Michael
--
Michael Viron
Core Systems Group
Simple End User Linux
>Use "rpm -qa | grep kernel" to see what kernels are installed. On my
>system this shows:
>
> kernel-pcmcia-cs-3.1.31-13
> kernel-source-
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Schwendt
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 5:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: /Boot is full - advice please
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:56:11 -0500, Otto Haliburton wrote:
>
> &
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:56:11 -0500, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> Does anybody on this list read How to install a linux kernel? I don't
> think so because if you did, it explicitly tells how to remove a kernel
> manually. It doesn't even suggest to remov
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Schwendt
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 1:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: /Boot is full - advice please
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:00:19 -0400, Kent Borg wrote:
> What Redhat recommends when undating your kernel is to use "-F" which
> will remove the old kernel, and /boot will not grow with each new
> kernel release.
Red Hat does _not_ recommend that. Actu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22 Aug 2003 11:46:17 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 10:11, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> > Not everyone installs their kernels as rpm so this won't work if he
> > installed his own kernel and may need to be done manually.
>
> Your so
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 12:45:45PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > How so? Up2date doesn't let kernels collect in /boot.
>
> Um...I beg to differ. I'm not an expert (yet! *grin*) but I can do
> an 'ls' with the best of them. *smile*
Oops. I was WRONG. up2date does, indeed, keep old kernel
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kent Borg
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 12:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: /Boot is full - advice please
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 01:03:56PM
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert C. Paulsen Jr.
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: /Boot is full - advice please
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 a
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:40:25AM -0500, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> > There were previous posting. His question was /boot is full. The
> > original response was to go to /boot and delete old kernels. That
> > is where RH places them and never deletes them.
>
> How so? Up2date doesn't let kerne
Glad I made.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Dixon
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:53 AM
> To: Red Hat Mailing List
> Subject: RE: /Boot is full - advice please
>
> On Fri, 2003-08-22 a
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 01:03:56PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> Kent, please don't yell at me, because I completely support what
> you've stated. I just wanted to suggest that the "-F" flag *not* be
> used for upgrading a kernel, regardless of what Red Hat suggests.
> IMO, it's much safer to instal
Around Fri,Aug 22 2003, at 01:03, Jason Dixon, wrote:
>On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 13:00, Kent Borg wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:40:25AM -0500, Otto Haliburton wrote:
>> > There were previous posting. His question was /boot is full. The
>stated. I just wanted to suggest that the "-F" flag *n
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 13:00, Kent Borg wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:40:25AM -0500, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> > There were previous posting. His question was /boot is full. The
> > original response was to go to /boot and delete old kernels. That
> > is where RH places them and never delete
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:40:25AM -0500, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> There were previous posting. His question was /boot is full. The
> original response was to go to /boot and delete old kernels. That
> is where RH places them and never deletes them.
How so? Up2date doesn't let kernels collect
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 12:40, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> There were previous posting. His question was /boot is full. The
> original response was to go to /boot and delete old kernels. That is
> where RH places them and never deletes them. It distinguishes them with
> labels. It was suggested tha
redhat-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Dixon
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 11:22 AM
> To: Red Hat Mailing List
> Subject: RE: /Boot is full - advice please
>
> On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 11:54, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> > You need to get a grip. All of the i
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:54:29AM -0500, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> You need to get a grip. All of the information is there and the kernels
> are lableled and the source in /usr/src is not installed. If you know
> how a kernel is booted then you will be able to observe how it is
> removed manually
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 11:54, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> You need to get a grip. All of the information is there and the kernels
> are lableled and the source in /usr/src is not installed. If you know
> how a kernel is booted then you will be able to observe how it is
> removed manually. I will say
Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Dixon
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 10:46 AM
> To: Red Hat Mailing List
> Subject: RE: /Boot is full - advice please
>
> On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 10:11, Otto Haliburton wro
t; [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Passey
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 10:45 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: /Boot is full - advice please
>
> I use RHN so I am installing via RPM.
>
> Thanks for the heads up.
>
> Kevin
> -Original Me
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 10:11, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> Not everyone installs their kernels as rpm so this won't work if he
> installed his own kernel and may need to be done manually.
Your solution was just as short-sighted as Robert's, yet not as
complete. Let's assume the user *did* build their
I use RHN so I am installing via RPM.
Thanks for the heads up.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Otto Haliburton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 August 2003 15:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: /Boot is full - advice please
Not everyone installs their kernels as rpm so this won
22, 2003 8:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: /Boot is full - advice please
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:11:59PM +0100, Kevin Passey wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As a new Linux user I need some help on this.
> >
> > I have been updating my server us
Thanks for the help guys.
Kevin Passey
-Original Message-
From: Robert C. Paulsen Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 August 2003 14:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: /Boot is full - advice please
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:11:59PM +0100, Kevin Passey wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:11:59PM +0100, Kevin Passey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a new Linux user I need some help on this.
>
> I have been updating my server using RHN no - problem there - but now my
> /boot is full - can I delete anything from there.
>
> It seems to keep all the kernel packages.
Yes, you can delete all old kernels from
/boot and /usr/src.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kevin Passey
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 8:12
AM
To: Red Hat (E-mail)
Subject: /Boot is full - advice
please
Hi
On 08/22/03 14:11 +0100, Kevin Passey wrote:
> I have been updating my server using RHN no - problem there - but now my /boot
> is full - can I delete anything from there.
>
> It seems to keep all the kernel packages.
You have to either erase old, unused kernels, via rpm -e or increase
the si
Hi,
As a new Linux user
I need some help on this.
I have been updating
my server using RHN no - problem there - but now my /boot is full - can I delete
anything from there.
It seems to keep all
the kernel packages.
Thanks in
advance
Kevin
29 matches
Mail list logo