Mark Hutchinson wrote:
They changed to policy on this yesterday. The 2 major number versions now comes
from Advanced server numbering. As this is much slower, your RHCE will last
alot longer.
Which is even better news for those of us who were certed in the 6.2-7.2
days:
From the email I rec
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 15:39, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 10:30, Joe Polk wrote:
> > We are a sensitive lot, no? :)
> >
> > <>
> >
>
> I'm sensitive mostly because this stuff affects my business - which
puts
> bread and butter on my table and takes care of my kids. This means
th
Ya did see this right?
http://www.redhat.com/training/rhce/rhce_faq.html
For how long will my RHCE certification be considered current?
The validity period for all RHCEs and RHCTs is now officially pegged to
the release of the Enterprise product commercially available at the time
certification wa
They changed to policy on this yesterday. The 2 major number versions now comes
from Advanced server numbering. As this is much slower, your RHCE will last
alot longer.
Mark
Quoting Joe Polk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The whole idea of outdating RHCE's at this time is stupid. There is not
> signif
The whole idea of outdating RHCE's at this time is stupid. There is not
significant differences between most RH versions since 6.0 to warrant
it. Yes, I realize iptables came along, new kernels, and the abandonment
of inetd but is that a reason for EOFing RHCE's? Maybe I'm missing
something but I d
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 15:39, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 10:30, Joe Polk wrote:
> > We are a sensitive lot, no? :)
> >
> > <>
> >
>
> I'm sensitive mostly because this stuff affects my business - which puts
> bread and butter on my table and takes care of my kids. This means th
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 15:44, Nate Golnik wrote:
> The nameing scheme did not have anything to do with trying to expire your
> certifications early. This a quote from Pete Childers VP of
> Global Learning Services (used with permission):
>
> "RHCEs should not worry that the new number scheme wil
Oh I understand completely.
<>
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 18:39, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 10:30, Joe Polk wrote:
> > We are a sensitive lot, no? :)
> >
> > <>
> >
>
> I'm sensitive mostly because this stuff affects my business - which puts
> bread and butter on my table and tak
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 17:36, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
>
> Joe Polk wrote:
> > We are a sensitive lot, no? :)
>
> You might be too if you spent $2500 less than a year ago for
> certification and coursework that had the potential of lasting less than
> 1.5 years.
>
> -Rick
Better than spending
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 10:30, Joe Polk wrote:
> We are a sensitive lot, no? :)
>
> <>
>
I'm sensitive mostly because this stuff affects my business - which puts
bread and butter on my table and takes care of my kids. This means that
I have to ditch the past seven months of mucking around with R
Joe Polk wrote:
We are a sensitive lot, no? :)
You might be too if you spent $2500 less than a year ago for
certification and coursework that had the potential of lasting less than
1.5 years.
-Rick
--
Rick Johnson, RHCE #807302311706007 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux/Network Administrator - Medat
We are a sensitive lot, no? :)
<>
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 18:24, Rick Johnson wrote:
> Nate Golnik wrote:
> > The naming scheme did not have anything to do with trying to expire your
> > certifications early. This a quote from Pete Childers VP of
> > Global Learning Services (used with permiss
Nate Golnik wrote:
The naming scheme did not have anything to do with trying to expire your
certifications early. This a quote from Pete Childers VP of
Global Learning Services (used with permission):
"RHCEs should not worry that the new number scheme will mean their
certifications age out earl
The nameing scheme did not have anything to do with trying to expire your
certifications early. This a quote from Pete Childers VP of
Global Learning Services (used with permission):
"RHCEs should not worry that the new number scheme will mean their
certifications age out earlier. It won't. Mo
14 matches
Mail list logo
