Actually...reiserfs was not originally designed as a journaling file
system. It was a file system (without journaling) that sped up access
to small files.
So, both filesystems have had journaling added after they were
initially written.
-Sam
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:40:52PM -0700, Gordon Mes
On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 16:33, Taylor Spears wrote:
> Well, I decided to go with ReiserFS. Ext3fs just sorta seems like a hack
> to ext2 to get journaling.
You could, I suppose, look at it one of two ways:
* ext3 is a hack on an old system
* ext2 was designed as an extensible, modular file system i
look bad.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Taylor Spears
> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 5:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Best Filesystem
>
>
> What would you say is the best filesystem to use for
used, but that was when I had IDE driver
problems, which made JFS look bad.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Taylor Spears
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 5:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Best Filesystem
What would you say is the bes
d recommed it.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Taylor Spears [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 12:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Best Filesystem
What would you say is the best filesystem to use for linux in terms of
reliability, stability, and performance?
What would you say is the best filesystem to use for linux in terms of
reliability, stability, and performance?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
