Well, I decided to go with ReiserFS. Ext3fs just sorta seems like a hack to ext2 to get journaling. I also heard that ext3 is pretty slow compared to reiser, and they are both very reliable. However, XFS looks really slick. It says it uses ACL's. Are these somewhat like NT style ACL'L, where you can choose individual user permissions, or is it like the old -rwxrwxrwx type of permission system
On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 15:14, Kevin Krieser wrote: > A lot of it depends on how adventuresome you are, and what you are running > on it. > > For my purposes, ReiserFS has run well. The only times I've had problems > were with underlying IDE problems, or when an immature, buggy, driver > overwrote freed memory. But there have been some reports of problems in > some kernel releases. It does have advantages with more efficient use of > disk space and small files. > > ext3 has the advantage that low level tools for ext2 can work on it. > > There are also XFS (SGI) and JFS (IBM), which I don't know enough to comment > on. JFS is the only one I've used, but that was when I had IDE driver > problems, which made JFS look bad. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Taylor Spears > Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 5:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Best Filesystem > > > What would you say is the best filesystem to use for linux in terms of > reliability, stability, and performance? > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
