Thanks for the info!
Haley
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Haley Crowe wrote:
Hello. I'm looking at upgrading to one of the newer versions of Redhat
from 7.x. Can anyone tell me how much binary-compatibility there is
from 7.x to 8 or 9?
In the old days Red Hat maintained binary compatiblity between version
that shared a major number. Now
Hello. I'm looking at upgrading to one of the newer versions of Redhat
from 7.x. Can anyone tell me how much binary-compatibility there is
from 7.x to 8 or 9?
Thanks.
Haley
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 11:12:54PM -0500, Greenberg, Michael wrote:
> We have customers requesting our products on RH Linux 7.2, RH Linux 8.0, and RH Linux
> Advanced Server. I am trying to determine if there is any binary
> compatibility statement between RH Linux 7.2/8.0 and RH Linux
Hello,
We have customers
requesting our products on RH Linux 7.2, RH Linux 8.0, and RH
Linux
Advanced Server. I
am trying to determine if there is any binary compatibility statement
between
RH Linux 7.2/8.0 and
RH Linux Advanced Server.
Is it expected that
applications built on either
> From: Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 14:51 18 Feb 2002, Dave Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | I'm just trying to understand something here. . . I skimmed the
> | release notes for the 1.3.14 development version of glib/gtk and it
> | contained:
> |
> | The API is frozen at thi
On 14:51 18 Feb 2002, Dave Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I'm just trying to understand something here. . . I skimmed the
| release notes for the 1.3.14 development version of glib/gtk and it
| contained:
|
| The API is frozen at this point. No additional API changes are
| anticipated befo
I'm just trying to understand something here. . . I skimmed the
release notes for the 1.3.14 development version of glib/gtk and it
contained:
The API is frozen at this point. No additional API changes are
anticipated before GTK+-2.0 is released.
Binary interfaces for these libraries ar
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: binary compatibility problems
> Andrew Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm having problems getting Entropic ESPS binaries to work under RH
7.2 --
> > they report "
Andrew Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having problems getting Entropic ESPS binaries to work under RH 7.2 --
> they report "command not found" when you try to run them. It's not a
> trivial path/permissions problem though.
>
> These are fairly old programs now -- originally r
Hi,
I'm having problems getting Entropic ESPS binaries to work under RH 7.2 --
they report "command not found" when you try to run them. It's not a
trivial path/permissions problem though.
These are fairly old programs now -- originally released for RH 5.1 -- but
ran OK under 6.2. Unfortunate
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 01:15:39PM -0200, José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> Do the bianries for XFree86-3.3.6 from the RH 6.2beta or from rawhide
> are compatible with the libraries from RH 6.1? Can I just download
> and install them to run them?
If you install XFree86-libs along with the X ser
12 matches
Mail list logo
