On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 16:48, Edward Dekkers wrote:
[Once again, reposting - I wonder if this is due to GPG sig
attachement?]
I don't know what it is with your mails Cliff, but they nearly always show
up on my screen as attachments instead of plain vanilla e-mail, like
everybody else's.
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 22:57, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote:
Nice message numnuts. It's blank. Tease me w/ a subject, then give me
the blank screen. dick.
I'd like to apologise to everyone on the list. My friend is paralyzed
from the neck up and doesn't realize he replied to the list instead of
Folks,
Ok, here is where I'm at and it does not look to good..
On the Memory front
I ran DocMemory over night (15+ hours) and it has passed 13 iterations
of the test sequence. I had also run memtest86 and it did show some
problems. I had called Cruial and they had recommended
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 09:59, Cliff Wells wrote:
This is a known problem with Outlook. It doesn't properly parse S/MIME
messages.
Usually when I post to public forums I do it without GPG signing as a
courtesy to the Outlook users, but since this is a Linux forum I hadn't
followed that rule.
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 11:44, Kent Perrier wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 09:59, Cliff Wells wrote:
This is a known problem with Outlook. It doesn't properly parse S/MIME
messages.
Usually when I post to public forums I do it without GPG signing as a
courtesy to the Outlook users, but
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 09:18, John B. Moore wrote:
[snip]
Using mem=512 still sometimes causes a kernal panic during the INIT. I
[snip]
entering mem=512 and pressing enter I get
Error 28: Selected item can not fit into memory
[snip]
I then removed half of the memory and tested with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Jan 2003 07:59:06 -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 16:48, Edward Dekkers wrote:
[Once again, reposting - I wonder if this is due to GPG sig
attachement?]
I don't know what it is with your mails Cliff, but they nearly
Correct... mem=512M ... (fingers getting behind brain...)
Cliff Wells wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 09:18, John B. Moore wrote:
[snip]
Using mem=512 still sometimes causes a kernal panic during the INIT. I
[snip]
entering mem=512 and pressing enter I get
Error 28: Selected
John B. Moore said:
Correct... mem=512M ... (fingers getting behind brain...)
some system setups have a tendancy to eat up to 1MB of extra memory,
on such systems the solution is to use mem=XXXM where XXX is 1MB less
then what you have, so in your case mem=511M . I have encountered this
with
Nate,
Thanks, that makes sense.. trouble is the Manual I have does not
indicate the voltage for either the DIMM or the SIMMs.. I'll check the
FIC website and see if there is more info on this..
I'll try the 511 suggestion tomorrow.. (got to earn some money
first..G)
John..
nate
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 14:05, John B. Moore wrote:
Thanks, that makes sense.. trouble is the Manual I have does not
indicate the voltage for either the DIMM or the SIMMs.. I'll check the
FIC website and see if there is more info on this..
That's what I love about manuals that come with
I agree, so far I have found nothing about the voltage requirements for
the SIMMs on the FIC website. I posted a tech support question about
this yesterday, no reply, also posted a queston on their forums so
far, no reply..
Maybe I need to go motherboard shopping...sigh
John...
Cliff
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 17:00, John B. Moore wrote:
I agree, so far I have found nothing about the voltage requirements for
the SIMMs on the FIC website. I posted a tech support question about
this yesterday, no reply, also posted a queston on their forums so
far, no reply..
Maybe I
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 08:03, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 22:57, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote:
Nice message numnuts. It's blank. Tease me w/ a subject, then give me
the blank screen. dick.
I'd like to apologise to everyone on the list. My friend is paralyzed
from the neck up
Oh, I did very briefly... not much was available...
Cliff Wells wrote:
You might just try googling for it, you might find other people who have
run into the same problem with that model of mobo. I'd do it for you
but I'm off to a Python SIG =)
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe
Greetings,
I need to run this by you folks and see if there are any
alternatives/issues that might get this to work. (using the very latest
kernal)
I have a VA-502 revA1 motherboard that has both DIMM slots and SIMM slots.
It is currently runing on the DIMM with two 64k DIMMS. Everything
Have you tried appending MEM=512M to the boot loader?
-Original Message-
From: John B. Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Memory - 512 SIMMS
Greetings,
I need to run this by you folks and see if there are any
13, 2003 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Memory - 512 SIMMS
Greetings,
I need to run this by you folks and see if there are any
alternatives/issues that might get this to work. (using the very latest
kernal)
I have a VA-502 revA1 motherboard that has both DIMM slots and SIMM slots
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 10:27, John B. Moore wrote:
Greetings,
I need to run this by you folks and see if there are any
alternatives/issues that might get this to work. (using the very latest
kernal)
I have a VA-502 revA1 motherboard that has both DIMM slots and SIMM slots
--
Cliff Wells wrote:
I take it you mean 64MB DIMMS wink.
Of course, my bad...
Why not use 2 256MB DIMMS? Cheaper, faster and easier to find.
According to my motherboard doc, 64 is the largest DIMM allowed.
I've had a couple of mobos that supported both SIMMS and DIMMS. The
DIMMS always
append ro root=LABEL=/ MEM=512M
I think that's correct ?
Shane
-Original Message-
From: John B. Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Memory - 512 SIMMS
Shane,
No.. Frankly I'm not that familiar with how to do
Put a space before MEM=512M
-Original Message-
From: John B. Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 2:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Memory - 512 SIMMS
Shane,
Thanks,,
Unfortunately I must be doing something wrong
I'm using GRUB I
, January 13, 2003 2:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Memory - 512 SIMMS
Shane,
Thanks,,
Unfortunately I must be doing something wrong
I'm using GRUB I believe and what I got in response during the boot was
mkrootdev: label: /MEM=512M not found
...and then a kernal panic
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:27:15AM -0800, John B. Moore wrote:
Greetings,
I need to run this by you folks and see if there are any
alternatives/issues that might get this to work. (using the very latest
kernal)
I have a VA-502 revA1 motherboard that has both DIMM slots and SIMM
Kevin,
Thanks for that info..
I'll followup on this ideas as soon as I finish the memory tests...
John...
Kevin MacNeil wrote:
What chipset does this mainboard have? My wife has a VA-503+ (also with
dimm and simm slots) with 1mb onboard cache and an mvp3 chipset, and it
can't cache
[Once again, reposting - I wonder if this is due to GPG sig
attachement?]
I don't know what it is with your mails Cliff, but they nearly always show
up on my screen as attachments instead of plain vanilla e-mail, like
everybody else's.
Mind you, I'm using LookOut here at work so the problem
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:14:15PM -0800, John B. Moore wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
I take it you mean 64MB DIMMS wink.
Of course, my bad...
Why not use 2 256MB DIMMS? Cheaper, faster and easier to find.
According to my motherboard doc, 64 is the largest DIMM allowed.
I've had a couple of
Fred,
Thanks for the thoughts... I'll investigate..
I have run memtest and MemoryDoc (or is it DocMemory??) the
memtest86 did appear to report a problem in the test #6, I then called
Crucial and they ask me to run the DocMemory tester.. The quick test
passed, I'm running the BurnIn all
Nice message numnuts. It's blank. Tease me w/ a subject, then give me
the blank screen. dick.
--
VB programmers ask why no one takes them seriously,
it's somewhat akin to a McDonalds manager asking employees
why they don't take their 'career' seriously.
signature.asc
Description: This is
29 matches
Mail list logo
