John Aldrich wrote:
On Thursday 17 July 2003 06:00 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote:
And if you're afraid of the actual installation of an X11 server (not a
client) on the Windows terminals, you may be able to just run putty on
the PC, and use the c3270 client on the Linux server.
Why not VNC/TightVNC/XVn
On Thursday 17 July 2003 04:11 pm, Timothy Stone wrote:
>
> VNC is an option, but would be frowned upon by the same coworkers
> (though they have "just discovered" VNC)--like it was brand new, and
> "it's free! can you believe it?! To bad it's not on Linux." (seriously,
> I had to bring them down s
On Thursday 17 July 2003 05:24 pm, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > VNC is an option, but would be frowned upon by the same coworkers
> > (though they have "just discovered" VNC)--like it was brand new, and
> > "it's free! can you believe it?! To bad it's not on Linux."
>
> (seriously,
>
> > I had to b
On Thursday 17 July 2003 06:00 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Frank Bax wrote:
> > At 02:57 PM 7/17/03, Timothy Stone wrote:
> >> Situation:
> >> I have 600+ clients on Windows desktops. Each connects to a mainframe
> >> data application via IBM Personal Communications 3270 Terminal
> >> Emulation ove
Frank Bax wrote:
At 02:57 PM 7/17/03, Timothy Stone wrote:
Situation:
I have 600+ clients on Windows desktops. Each connects to a mainframe
data application via IBM Personal Communications 3270 Terminal
Emulation over telnet (ugh!).
It sounds like you want something like PuTTY, but that allows
> VNC is an option, but would be frowned upon by the same coworkers
> (though they have "just discovered" VNC)--like it was brand new, and
> "it's free! can you believe it?! To bad it's not on Linux."
(seriously,
> I had to bring them down slowly). Installing VNC would be considered a
> security is
Frank Bax wrote:
At 02:57 PM
7/17/03, Timothy Stone wrote:
Situation:
I have 600+ clients on Windows desktops. Each connects to a mainframe data
application via IBM Personal Communications 3270 Terminal Emulation over
telnet (ugh!).
It sounds like you want something like PuTTY, but tha
At 04:11 PM 7/17/03, Timothy Stone wrote:
Eric Chevalier wrote:
If you're going to install Cygwin and XFree86 on the Windows systems,
what about the possibility of installing x3270 on those same boxes, as
well? The New Features/Change List for x3270:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks
At 02:57 PM 7/17/03, Timothy Stone wrote:
Situation:
I have 600+ clients on Windows desktops. Each connects to a mainframe data
application via IBM Personal Communications 3270 Terminal Emulation over
telnet (ugh!).
What I know:
x3270 works on a RHL 8 server that I use as a testbed. I know that
Eric Chevalier wrote:
If you're going to install Cygwin and XFree86 on the Windows systems,
what about the possibility of installing x3270 on those same boxes, as
well? The New Features/Change List for x3270:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/7814/man/New.html
has a comment about "C
Timothy Stone wrote:
Situation:
I have 600+ clients on Windows desktops. Each connects to a mainframe
data application via IBM Personal Communications 3270 Terminal
Emulation over telnet (ugh!).
What I know:
x3270 works on a RHL 8 server that I use as a testbed. I know that I
can use x3270 on
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 13:57, Timothy Stone wrote:
> I have an opportunity to promote the rapid adoption of opensource
> backend solution using Linux. I need to have a 30,000 ft view, or
> better, of making this work:
>
> Situation:
> I have 600+ clients on Windows desktops. Each connects to a ma
I have an opportunity to promote the rapid adoption of opensource
backend solution using Linux. I need to have a 30,000 ft view, or
better, of making this work:
Situation:
I have 600+ clients on Windows desktops. Each connects to a mainframe
data application via IBM Personal Communications 3270
13 matches
Mail list logo
