-- Original Message ---
From: "Brian J. Smith-Sweeney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 Jan 2003 10:16:30 -0800
Subject: RE: Phoebe - 8.0.93
> On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:55, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:45, Buck
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:55, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:45, Buck wrote:
> > Nodeps is no dependants. That is why it is more likely to disrupt your
> > system.
>
> I know what it is. Nodeps doesn't make dependencies go away, though.
> It just won't warn you before it insta
Words by Gordon Messmer [Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 03:55:37PM -0800]:
> On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:45, Buck wrote:
> > Nodeps is no dependants. That is why it is more likely to disrupt your
> > system.
>
> I know what it is. Nodeps doesn't make dependencies go away, though.
> It just won't warn you b
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:45, Buck wrote:
> Nodeps is no dependants. That is why it is more likely to disrupt your
> system.
I know what it is. Nodeps doesn't make dependencies go away, though.
It just won't warn you before it installs a package that isn't going to
work on your system.
Using -
Nodeps is no dependants. That is why it is more likely to disrupt your
system.
Buck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Gordon Messmer
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Phoebe - 8.0.93
On Fri, 2003
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 03:01, Jose Celestino wrote:
> Words by Gordon Messmer [Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 05:59:32PM -0800]:
> >
> > I agree, and I'll add: chastise whoever gives you the advise to use
> > --nodeps unless they give you a very clear explanation of why it's
> > appropriate in that specific
Words by Gordon Messmer [Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 05:59:32PM -0800]:
> On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 10:30, Ed Wilts wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:37:34PM +, Jose Celestino wrote:
> > > Ok. That was it, all of this stuff was moved from the XFree86-libs
> > > package to the XFree86-libs-data. I did
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 10:30, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:37:34PM +, Jose Celestino wrote:
> > Ok. That was it, all of this stuff was moved from the XFree86-libs
> > package to the XFree86-libs-data. I did a rpm -F --nodeps * so I failed
> > to install this last one :/
>
>
> A
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:37:34PM +, Jose Celestino wrote:
> Ok. That was it, all of this stuff was moved from the XFree86-libs
> package to the XFree86-libs-data. I did a rpm -F --nodeps * so I failed
> to install this last one :/
And this is the primary reason why people should *never* use
> Ok. That was it, all of this stuff was moved from the XFree86-libs
> package to the XFree86-libs-data. I did a rpm -F --nodeps * so I failed
> to install this last one :/
>
Exactly what I suspected you had done.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsub
Words by Nathan G. Grennan [Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 05:47:55AM -0800]:
> On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 04:31, Jose Celestino wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > how come XFree86-4.2.99.3-20030115 (which comes with phoebe 8.0.93)
> > doesn't come with an rgb database, and worse, it d
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 04:31, Jose Celestino wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how come XFree86-4.2.99.3-20030115 (which comes with phoebe 8.0.93)
> doesn't come with an rgb database, and worse, it doesn't bring any
> locale info whatesoever (which definitely fsck the paste on xterm, dzt
Hi,
how come XFree86-4.2.99.3-20030115 (which comes with phoebe 8.0.93)
doesn't come with an rgb database, and worse, it doesn't bring any
locale info whatesoever (which definitely fsck the paste on xterm, dzt,
and so on)...
Is there any XFree 4.2.1 rpms available?
TIA.
--
Jose
13 matches
Mail list logo