RE: Phoebe - 8.0.93

2003-01-29 Thread Brian J. Smith-Sweeney
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:55, Gordon Messmer wrote: On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:45, Buck wrote: Nodeps is no dependants. That is why it is more likely to disrupt your system. I know what it is. Nodeps doesn't make dependencies go away, though. It just won't warn you before it installs a

RE: Phoebe - 8.0.93

2003-01-29 Thread Mike Vanecek
-- Original Message --- From: Brian J. Smith-Sweeney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 Jan 2003 10:16:30 -0800 Subject: RE: Phoebe - 8.0.93 On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:55, Gordon Messmer wrote: On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:45, Buck wrote: Nodeps is no dependants

Re: Phoebe - 8.0.93

2003-01-27 Thread Jose Celestino
Words by Gordon Messmer [Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 03:55:37PM -0800]: On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:45, Buck wrote: Nodeps is no dependants. That is why it is more likely to disrupt your system. I know what it is. Nodeps doesn't make dependencies go away, though. It just won't warn you before

Re: Phoebe - 8.0.93

2003-01-24 Thread Jose Celestino
Words by Gordon Messmer [Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 05:59:32PM -0800]: On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 10:30, Ed Wilts wrote: On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:37:34PM +, Jose Celestino wrote: Ok. That was it, all of this stuff was moved from the XFree86-libs package to the XFree86-libs-data. I did a rpm -F

Re: Phoebe - 8.0.93

2003-01-24 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 03:01, Jose Celestino wrote: Words by Gordon Messmer [Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 05:59:32PM -0800]: I agree, and I'll add: chastise whoever gives you the advise to use --nodeps unless they give you a very clear explanation of why it's appropriate emin that specific

RE: Phoebe - 8.0.93

2003-01-24 Thread Buck
Nodeps is no dependants. That is why it is more likely to disrupt your system. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gordon Messmer Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Phoebe - 8.0.93 On Fri, 2003

RE: Phoebe - 8.0.93

2003-01-24 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 15:45, Buck wrote: Nodeps is no dependants. That is why it is more likely to disrupt your system. I know what it is. Nodeps doesn't make dependencies go away, though. It just won't warn you before it installs a package that isn't going to work on your system. Using

Re: Phoebe - 8.0.93

2003-01-22 Thread Nathan G. Grennan
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 04:31, Jose Celestino wrote: Hi, how come XFree86-4.2.99.3-20030115 (which comes with phoebe 8.0.93) doesn't come with an rgb database, and worse, it doesn't bring any locale info whatesoever (which definitely fsck the paste on xterm, dzt, and so on)... Is there any

Re: Phoebe - 8.0.93

2003-01-22 Thread Jose Celestino
Words by Nathan G. Grennan [Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 05:47:55AM -0800]: On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 04:31, Jose Celestino wrote: Hi, how come XFree86-4.2.99.3-20030115 (which comes with phoebe 8.0.93) doesn't come with an rgb database, and worse, it doesn't bring any locale info whatesoever

Re: Phoebe - 8.0.93

2003-01-22 Thread Nathan G. Grennan
Ok. That was it, all of this stuff was moved from the XFree86-libs package to the XFree86-libs-data. I did a rpm -F --nodeps * so I failed to install this last one :/ Exactly what I suspected you had done. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Phoebe - 8.0.93

2003-01-22 Thread Ed Wilts
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:37:34PM +, Jose Celestino wrote: Ok. That was it, all of this stuff was moved from the XFree86-libs package to the XFree86-libs-data. I did a rpm -F --nodeps * so I failed to install this last one :/ And this is the primary reason why people should *never* use

Re: Phoebe - 8.0.93

2003-01-22 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 10:30, Ed Wilts wrote: On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:37:34PM +, Jose Celestino wrote: Ok. That was it, all of this stuff was moved from the XFree86-libs package to the XFree86-libs-data. I did a rpm -F --nodeps * so I failed to install this last one :/ And this