Re: RH 70 and $9.95

2000-09-27 Thread Michael R. Jinks
FWIW: some on this list might be interested in looking at KRUD, "Kevin's Redhat UberDistribution", info available at www.tummy.com. I subscribed last spring, and I love it: once a month they send you a CD with the latest updates published by Red Hat. Sounds to me like RH's new service will bear

RE: RH 70 and $9.95

2000-09-27 Thread John MacLean
ired more of their time," said Young. -Original Message- From: Wayne Dyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 5:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RH 70 and $9.95 Rick Forrister wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > In the articl

Re: RH 70 and $9.95

2000-09-27 Thread Gavin
ICQ: 20277424 http://durman.xu.edu -- >From: Rick Forrister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: RH 70 and $9.95 >Date: Wed, Sep 27, 2000, 11:05 AM > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I beg to differ on RH not making money on the software. Af

Re: RH 70 and $9.95

2000-09-27 Thread Rick Forrister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I beg to differ on RH not making money on the software. After being > annoyed at how quickly 6.2 followed 6.1, I waited until about 3 weeks > ago to buy 6.2. I have 6.1 pro for which I paid roughly $80. I wanted > to continue to using SWS, but now to do that it was going

re: RH 70 and $9.95

2000-09-26 Thread Uncle Meat
On 27-Sep-2000 Alan Lehman spoke something to the effect: > I beg to differ on RH not making money on the software. After being > annoyed at how quickly 6.2 followed 6.1, I waited until about 3 weeks > ago to buy 6.2. I have 6.1 pro for which I paid roughly $80. I wanted to > continue to using SW

re: RH 70 and $9.95

2000-09-26 Thread Alan Lehman
I beg to differ on RH not making money on the software. After being annoyed at how quickly 6.2 followed 6.1, I waited until about 3 weeks ago to buy 6.2. I have 6.1 pro for which I paid roughly $80. I wanted to continue to using SWS, but now to do that it was going to cost me $179. I finally bit t

Re: RH 70 and $9.95

2000-09-26 Thread Wayne Dyer
Rick Forrister wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > In the article at cnet (http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2841538.ht > > ml?tag=st.ne.1430735..ni) they say that upgrades and bug fixes get > > sent to the $9.95 customers. Does it mean they won't be freely > > downloadable any more? If so,

Re: RH 70 and $9.95

2000-09-26 Thread Rick Forrister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > In the article at cnet (http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2841538.ht > ml?tag=st.ne.1430735..ni) they say that upgrades and bug fixes get > sent to the $9.95 customers. Does it mean they won't be freely > downloadable any more? If so, then it's not what I would call g

Re: RH 70 and $9.95

2000-09-26 Thread Jeff Hogg
-Original Message- From: Martin Sieben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 10:08 AM Subject: RH 70 and $9.95 > >In the article at cnet >(http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2841538.html?tag=st.ne.1430735..ni) >they say that

Re: RH 70 and $9.95

2000-09-26 Thread John Aldrich
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Martin Sieben wrote: > In the article at cnet > (http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2841538.html?tag=st.ne.1430735..ni) > they say that upgrades and bug fixes get sent to the $9.95 customers. Does > it mean they won't be freely downloadable any more? If so, then it's not > w