Thanks for the help. I have the changes made in the sendmail.mc file, and
ran a make -c /etc/mail. Unfortunately, it's still not working. Here is a
snip from my maillog:
Aug 7 12:01:26 atlas sendmail[25486]: h77G1Nsg025486: ruleset=check_rcpt,
arg1=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=194.sub-166-180-2
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Christian Campbell wrote:
> Thanks for the help. I have the changes made in the sendmail.mc file, and
> ran a make -c /etc/mail. Unfortunately, it's still not working. Here is a
> snip from my maillog:
>
> Aug 7 12:01:26 atlas sendmail[25486]: h77G1Nsg025486: ruleset=chec
> Recently I turned on SMTP AUTH, and everything was working well. Sendmail
> would relay mail for authenticated users using SASL. A few days ago,
> users
> were unable to send mail anymore using SASL. Outlook Express (and other
> various mail clients) would not authenticate.
>
> If I telnet to
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 17:04, Richard Humphrey wrote:
> Sorry for the long post but I am really trying to understand why this
> isnt working. I have verified with 2 techs at my ISP that they are not
> blocking any ports. (wanted to clear that up right away)
>
> I have a machine set up at home (RedH
[snip]
try...
define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A')dnl
I beleive the "p" (in your example) disables plain text authentication.
Steve Cowles
[snip]
Thanks for the tip. I tried this and still get the same error. I dont
think the request is even getting to my mail server somehow.
--
redhat-list mail
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 4:04 PM
> To: RedHat
> Subject: SMTP Auth
>
>
>
> define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS',
> `authwarnings,novrfy,noexpn,restrictqrun')dnl
> define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A p y')dnl
> TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`
> some questions on this (thanks for doing this, by the way).
>
> first of all, I'm running Red Hat Linux 7.3, pretty much out of the box
> (plus eratta).
>
> On 29-Jan-02 Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
snip.
> note that the AUTH line is not there.
>
> any hints ?
You did restart the sendmail daem
some questions on this (thanks for doing this, by the way).
first of all, I'm running Red Hat Linux 7.3, pretty much out of the box (plus
eratta).
On 29-Jan-02 Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> All:
>
> The following are basic instructions on enabling SMTP AUTH on a late-model
> server. These instructi
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 06:47:07PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A')dnl
> > TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN')dnl
> > define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS', `DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN')dnl
> >
> > This works just fine and authenticates a user against a
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 06:35, Bradley Glonka wrote:
> define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A')dnl
> TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN')dnl
> define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS', `DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN')dnl
>
> This works just fine and authenticates a user against a system account.
>
> Ca
At 4/10/2002 01:59 PM -0700, you wrote:
>Yes, history will show that when Rodolfo is way off topic, he at least
>has the decency to announce it with a bold subject line:
>
>http://www.prairienet.org/library/redhat/redhat-list/2001/06/msg00682.php
Gee thanks, David; use my past sins against me!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>Also, let's keep this thread to SMTP AUTH for the moment, shall we? Raise
>this issue as a separate thread so we can all keep our head in order. It's
>easier that way... just write a new message with a different subject like
At 4/10/2002 07:43 PM +0100, you wrote:
>why does redhat not install qmail as default...this is much better than
>sendmail?
Try not to state "A is much better than B" unless you are a certified
global expert on the subject; you'll find that 99% of the time the reason
things are done is simply t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ross Cooney wrote:
Short answers (preemptive flame?) ...
>why does redhat install sendmail by default?
>Should you not install a mta as an optional extra?
Having an MTA present and running is probably not necessary, but it is
helpful, and gives th
I have a few questions of my own...
why does redhat install sendmail by default?
Should you not install a mta as an optional extra?
why does redhat not install qmail as default...this is much better than
sendmail?
ross (waiting for flames) cooney
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PRO
Go to http://www.qmail.org to find out lots of qmail documentation
including a link that will point you to the mailing list. I recommend
"Life with qmail" by Dave Sill.
As far as your problems sending mail, qmail doesnt relay by default
(which is a good thing).
If youre running the tcpserver
16 matches
Mail list logo
