On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:23:40 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I want to enable two users from our windows domain to access particular
share from my samba server. I am new to linux ... please help me out.
I'd setup public share and configured samba long time before. It works fine.
Subject: Re: samba question
On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 06:15, linux power wrote:
Open the ports 137-139 on your lan card.
Ah... not sure what you meant by open the ports 137-139 on my lan card
but your comment did point me in the right direction. I forgot that
RH
8.0 configures a firewall. I
Open the ports 137-139 on your lan card.
--- Russell Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
I'm having trouble getting SAMBA 2.2.5 (RH 8.0)
speaking with my XP and
98 boxes. Actually, I can do a smbclient from the
linux box and connect
to a share on the MS boxes... just can't browse
shares
linux power wrote:
Open the ports 137-139 on your lan card.
--- Russell Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
I'm having trouble getting SAMBA 2.2.5 (RH 8.0)
speaking with my XP and
98 boxes. Actually, I can do a smbclient from the
linux box and connect
to a share on the MS boxes... just
On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 06:15, linux power wrote:
Open the ports 137-139 on your lan card.
Ah... not sure what you meant by open the ports 137-139 on my lan card
but your comment did point me in the right direction. I forgot that RH
8.0 configures a firewall. I needed to change the INPUT rules
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Question
if i{m not wrong, in Windows you must use backslashes instead of slashes..
Daniel BI
On the Windows client, open my computer, select Tools-Map network drive
and
type:
//sambaservername/sharename
where 'sambaservername' is your 'samba
http://freshmeat.net/projects/linneighborhood/
It is a network neighborhood for linux X-windows that will
allow to mount network drives.
or you can use the mount command
mount -t msdos //windowsmachines/sharename
/desired/location
- Original Message -
From:
Jay Paulson
On the Windows client, open my computer, select Tools-Map network drive and
type:
//sambaservername/sharename
where 'sambaservername' is your 'samba 2.2.2' machine, and sharename is the
samba share you wish to attach too. Another way is to go to my network
places (pre W2K) and browse for it.
In
erm ya
I interpeted it backwards.
- Original Message -
From: Binyon Steve Contr Det 4 AFC2TIG/ASRCC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: Samba Question
On the Windows client, open my computer, select Tools-Map network drive
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.2-Manual/custom-guide/samba.html
shows you how to setup the Red Hat Linux side.
Sincerely,
Tammy
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 10:26:50AM -0600, Jay Paulson wrote:
Can anyone either tell me or point me to a good place to figure out how to map a
drive
I've gone through the suggestions.. i've even gone
to BN and got a couple of books on samba... but the redhat machine isn't
even showing up on our local network.. although i can bring it up in IE by
pluging in 192.168.0.137 and i can ssh into it etc.. but i just can't see it on
the local
This might sound stupid, but are you using Iptables/Ipchains at all? Did
you make sure to leave the Windows networking ports open? I know you
might not be firewalling at all, but often in troubleshooting people
miss these sort of things.
Jared
On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 13:12, Jay Paulson wrote:
]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:12
PM
Subject: Re: Samba Question
I've gone through the suggestions.. i've even
gone to BN and got a couple of books on samba... but the redhat machine
isn't even showing up on our local network.. although i can bring it up in IE
by pluging
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Jay Paulson wrote:
I've gone through the suggestions.. i've even gone to BN and got a couple of books
on samba... but the redhat machine isn't even showing up on our local network..
although i can bring it up in IE by pluging in 192.168.0.137 and i can ssh into it
etc..
: Samba Question
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Jay Paulson wrote:
I've gone through the suggestions.. i've even gone to BN and got a
couple of books on samba... but the redhat machine isn't even showing up on
our local network.. although i can bring it up in IE by pluging in
192.168.0.137 and i can ssh
: Re: Samba Question
nmbd is running and it is broadcasting on 192.168.0.255 i run the
nmblookup
and get the following:
querying nameofserver on 192.168.0.255
name_query failed to find name nameofserver
in my smb.conf file i have the following.
interfaces = 192.168.0.137
reomte announce
Hi,
Does your workgroup match whatever it shows under
network neighborhood properties?
Have you removed the IPX/SPX and NetBEUI protocols
from your windows pc?
Linda
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
if i{m not wrong, in Windows you must use backslashes instead of slashes..
Daniel BI
On the Windows client, open my computer, select Tools-Map network drive and
type:
//sambaservername/sharename
where 'sambaservername' is your 'samba 2.2.2' machine, and sharename is the
samba share you
i found out that we aren't running a workgroup here but a domain. so
i gotthe network admin to add my samba server to the PDC so now it is
showing upin network neighborhood. however, when i run the smbpass to
try and jointhe domain i get the error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED we are using
a NT4
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:12:05PM -0600, Jay Paulson wrote:
I've gone through the suggestions.. i've even gone to BN and got a couple of books
on samba... but the redhat machine isn't even showing up on our local network..
although i can bring it up in IE by pluging in 192.168.0.137 and i can
On 1 Aug 00, at 21:46, Steven Pierce wrote:
Is Samba, the only way to get from an NT box to a Linux box? I
worked in an office that I was able to get to the SUN boxes, but did
not use Samba. Does anyone know why??
Mmmm, could it be... NFS?!?! church-lady impression
That'd be my guess,
On 02 Aug 2000 06:46 Steven Pierce wrote:
Is Samba, the only way to get from an NT box to a Linux box? I worked in
an office that I was able
to get to the SUN boxes, but did not use Samba. Does anyone know why??
Steven
You're _sure_ the Sun box wasn't running Samba? It's transparent to
At 13:18 01/08/00 -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
trouble is that NT and Windows 98 don't include the space availible
under the Software directory when veiwing in explorer. Even selecting
Samba always reports the amount of writable space (not necessarily the same
as the amount of free space, since it
Chris Watt wrote:
Samba always reports the amount of writable space (not necessarily the same
as the amount of free space, since it takes disk quotas into account) on
whatever filesystem the root directory of a particular share is on. This is
because neither Windows nor SMB are set up to
Is Samba, the only way to get from an NT box to a Linux box? I worked in an office
that I was able
to get to the SUN boxes, but did not use Samba. Does anyone know why??
Steven
BTW.. I am a newbie also...SORRY
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/1/2000 at 6:11 PM Chris Watt
At 02:02 PM 2/28/00 -0500, Steve wrote:
I have 2 subnets w/ a rh6.1 samba server/router in the middle ie:
subnet 192.168.0.0 -eth1/router/sambaserver/eth2--subnet 192.168.1.0
I can ping one subnet from the other etc. but can't get the winblows boxes on
one subnet to see the other in the
I did and it works!
Thank you!
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
At 02:02 PM 2/28/00 -0500, Steve wrote:
I have 2 subnets w/ a rh6.1 samba server/router in the middle ie:
subnet 192.168.0.0 -eth1/router/sambaserver/eth2--subnet 192.168.1.0
I can ping one subnet
Only one line, addresses seperated by commas.
docs:
hosts allow (S)
A synonym for this parameter is 'allow hosts'
This parameter is a comma, space, or tab delimited set of hosts which are
permitted to access a service.
If specified in the [global] section then it will apply to all
On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, Robert A. Hayden wrote:
I have a samba share I've set up that I restrict by IP address. It's
starting to get a little unwieldy since there are several listings in it.
I tried simply adding a new "hosts allow =" line in smb.conf but it only
accepted addresses listed in
Here's my smb.conf file:
# This is the main Samba configuration file.
# You should read the# smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options
listed
# here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too
# many!) most of which are not shown in this example
#
# Any line
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, David Powers wrote:
snip
-If the windows box is not showing up on itself and you can ping and ftp
-to the linux box, then we know your network is working. I would suggest
-that you might have a conflict problem with nic in the windows box
-but it sounds more to me
On Sat, 27 Nov 1999 08:13:36 +0100 (CET), hai scritto:
*** I started the Win box yesterday just to generate "fresh" logs. I did
find an error message in the log.nmb which I didn't see before concerning
the WINS server. Here follows the log.nmb:
You put a lot of global settings under a share
[1999/11/26 21:19:55, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(180)
process_name_refresh_request: unicast name registration request received
for name LINUXSERV00 from IP 198.0.1.2 on subnet
Zoki wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Edward Dekkers wrote:
snip
-Seems he's wrong. My 95/98 boxes log onto SAMBA as an NT server. Even run
-startup-scripts.
*** What's your secret!?
I calmed down a bit since Sunday but it did cost me a keyboard and the
piece of the screen housing to
P.S. Sorry to the list for the upcoming Microsoft (tm) references.
*** What's your secret!?
Well, I could send you all the Samba configurations, netlogon scripts etc.,
but I have a distinct feeling it will do zip with your configuration. If
your own computer doesn't show in NN, then it seems
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Edward Dekkers wrote:
P.S. Sorry to the list for the upcoming Microsoft (tm) references.
*** What's your secret!?
Well, I could send you all the Samba configurations, netlogon scripts etc.,
but I have a distinct feeling it will do zip with your configuration. If
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Edward Dekkers wrote:
snip
-Seems he's wrong. My 95/98 boxes log onto SAMBA as an NT server. Even run
-startup-scripts.
*** What's your secret!?
I calmed down a bit since Sunday but it did cost me a keyboard and the
piece of the screen housing to blow off steam.
My
If I'm not mistaken, entries for BOTH localhost and the actual machine
name are required.That's how I have mine set up, and it works the
way it's supposed to.
-Original Message-
From: Paul M. Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 11:11 PM
To: RedHat List
No, you can use it as an NT or 9x PDC; I'm doing it myself at home. The
problem I ran into was that regardless of how many How-tos I read, it
wouldn't work. It kept telling me either that it couldn't find a domain
controller or that the password was wrong. Then I went into Linuxconf
and
What does your smb.conf file look like?
--
From: Paul M. Foster[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 12:11 AM
To: RedHat List
Subject: Samba Question
Sambanese:
Two computer network. One Win95, the other Linux RH 6.1. Both can ping
Hang on, I thought the idea of Samba was that a Linux box could look just
like
an NT one to the rest of the network. (At least, that's what the blurb
always
says.) But this implies that Samba can't masquerade as an NT domain. Is
this
guy right, or is he just lazy with his config files? ;)
James,
You are wanting to mount the Win95/Win3.11 shares?
If so, look at smbclient and smbmount (samba and smbfs rpms)
smbclient -L machine_name will show you shares on the Wxx boxes.
(If it cannot resolve (DNS) put the machines in your /etc/hosts)
smbmount /machine_name/share /mnt/point -n -d
42 matches
Mail list logo
