RE: Telnet hesitation

1998-04-07 Thread Fred Lenk
13:59:27 -0500 > From: tjordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To:Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Telnet hesitation > Any idea how to keep it from doing this? Most of our machines (win95) are > configured with IP only and don't have fq

Re: Telnet hesitation

1998-04-07 Thread GBNSCHBACH
In a message dated 98-04-06 14:21:43 EDT, you write: << Subj: Re: Telnet hesitation Date: 98-04-06 14:21:43 EDT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Price) Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes, I understand that this has to do with the Target machine f

Re: Telnet hesitation

1998-04-07 Thread L. M. Marchese
I think that it is the tcpd wrapper that does reverselookup, and not the telnet or other utilities. Try removing the tcpd from /etc/inetd.conf, ofcourse you will be loosing some security features. tjordan wrote: > Any idea how to keep it from doing this? Most of our machines (win95) > are > co

RE: Telnet hesitation

1998-04-06 Thread Dave Price
I know of none - i think this is coded into the logging feature of the telnetd daemon - if you looked at the sources 800+ IP addresses should be documented somehow/somewhere - perhaps a perl script could create a hosts file - barring that, i would write a perl script ot generate a fake host

RE: Telnet hesitation

1998-04-06 Thread tjordan
I tried this with one workstation and it cleared up the problem from that workstation right away. That seems to be the problem in a nutshell. I'm still wondering, though, if there's some other way to discourage the box from doing a reverse lookup for each IP. I really don't want to have to ente

RE: Telnet hesitation

1998-04-06 Thread Gerney, Eric
April 06, 1998 2:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Telnet hesitation > > I don't have an answer for you, but I have had (and am currently having) > the > same problem. > > The same situation occurs for HTTP and FTP connections as well. Oddly > enou

RE: Telnet hesitation

1998-04-06 Thread Dave Price
I think if you add the the client hostnames/ip addresses to /etc/hosts on the target box it will help as long as target box /etc/resolv.conf allows for hosts before bind dave On Mon, 6 Apr 1998, tjordan wrote: > Any idea how to keep it from doing this? Most of our machines (win95) are > c

Re: Telnet hesitation

1998-04-06 Thread Pat Hennessy
On Mon, 6 Apr 1998, Dave Price wrote: > Yes, > > I understand that this has to do with the Target machine failing to > reverse resolve the ip address that you are telnetting from ... it > eventually times out and lets you in anyway - look at /var/log/messages on > the target - you will see tha

RE: Telnet hesitation

1998-04-06 Thread tjordan
Any idea how to keep it from doing this? Most of our machines (win95) are configured with IP only and don't have fqdn's associated with them through DNS. Is there a way that you know of to avoid the name lookups? >= Original Message From Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = >Yes, > >I under

Re: Telnet hesitation

1998-04-06 Thread kgibson
I get that several times when I telnet to certain accounts at college. If you have an external modem, you would notice that your computer keeps sending packets for a response and there is no response for a long time. I don't know the true explanation for this hang up, I'm not a network expert but

Re: Telnet hesitation

1998-04-06 Thread Dave Price
Yes, I understand that this has to do with the Target machine failing to reverse resolve the ip address that you are telnetting from ... it eventually times out and lets you in anyway - look at /var/log/messages on the target - you will see that the log usually shows names (fqdn) for telnet sessi

RE: Telnet hesitation

1998-04-06 Thread tjordan
I don't have an answer for you, but I have had (and am currently having) the same problem. The same situation occurs for HTTP and FTP connections as well. Oddly enough, ping response is just fine ( < 4ms over 10BaseT link) If you find a resolution, please post it to the list. Thanks, Tom >=