> >Could mean a move to debian or freebsd for servers.
>
> Why? Personally, I see Fedora as being functionally equivalent to RHL 10,
> and for small servers I would have run 10 without question. No reason on
> Earth for me not to use Fedora for those, since I expect to see RH put as
> much int
Sounds like SuSE will be used more in the future.
:-( Bob
Gerry Doris wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 17:37 9/22/2003, you wrote:
On the other hand (from a University on a tight budget) I don't fancy forking
out for large numbers of RHEL licenses and I'm not sure about r
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 00:22:05 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote
> At 17:37 9/22/2003, you wrote:
> >On the other hand (from a University on a tight budget) I don't fancy forking
> >out for large numbers of RHEL licenses and I'm not sure about running vital
> >services on Fedora.
> >
> >Could mean a move
At 00:50 9/23/2003, you wrote:
I don't believe that Redhat will be putting any testing and quality
control into this new Fedora version.
I don't expect them to do that, since this would alienate a huge part of
their community which in some way does generate "leads" for later RHEL
sales. I don't t
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 17:37 9/22/2003, you wrote:
> >On the other hand (from a University on a tight budget) I don't fancy forking
> >out for large numbers of RHEL licenses and I'm not sure about running vital
> >services on Fedora.
> >
> >Could mean a move to debian or
Does this mean Red Hat is no longer putting ot their own OS?
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 02:22 am, you wrote:
> At 17:37 9/22/2003, you wrote:
> >On the other hand (from a University on a tight budget) I don't fancy
> > forking out for large numbers of RHEL licenses and I'm not sure about
> > ru
At 17:37 9/22/2003, you wrote:
On the other hand (from a University on a tight budget) I don't fancy forking
out for large numbers of RHEL licenses and I'm not sure about running vital
services on Fedora.
Could mean a move to debian or freebsd for servers.
Why? Personally, I see Fedora as being fun
> Thanks for digging that up. I'm not sure whether to consider it good
> news or bad- with all their changes, I've lost track. :-P
I consider it both good and bad.
Currently it's a lot of work building rpms for all the stuff we need that's
not bundled with RedHat (or is out of date). Fedo
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 19:09, Ian Mortimer wrote:
> > I wish I knew. RH was very prompt about explaining to current RHCE's
> > how the original numbering changes would affect our certification
> > period. I haven't heard anything from RH since they've issued the press
> > release that signalled th
> I wish I knew. RH was very prompt about explaining to current RHCE's
> how the original numbering changes would affect our certification
> period. I haven't heard anything from RH since they've issued the press
> release that signalled the end of the "retail" version.
>
> Previously, my certi
10 matches
Mail list logo
