On the other hand (from a University on a tight budget) I don't fancy forking out for large numbers of RHEL licenses and I'm not sure about running vital services on Fedora.
Could mean a move to debian or freebsd for servers.
Why? Personally, I see Fedora as being functionally equivalent to RHL 10, and for small servers I would have run 10 without question. No reason on Earth for me not to use Fedora for those, since I expect to see RH put as much into Fedora as they did into RHL... so no loss in functionality or reliability or trustworthiness.
What do you see differently?
-- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
