m, but
as soon as I see a "RH 2003" which is upgraded by "RH XP" I'm jumping
ship.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Seyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RHCE certifications and how current t
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:52:39PM -0600, Rigler, Steve wrote:
>
> MS's version numbering system is so screwed it doesn't even deserve
> mention (am I a version number, a year or a 2 letter buzz-phrase?).
To their credit, I think Microsoft had a good idea when they started
using the year instead o
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 13:52, Rigler, Steve wrote:
> MS's version numbering system is so screwed it doesn't even deserve
> mention (am I a version number, a year or a 2 letter buzz-phrase?).
>
> The US consumer market understands consistency. Just look at how
> many sysadmins still say "Solaris 2.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:48:00PM -0500, Ezra Nugroho wrote:
> I don't think that the integer only numbering is to confuse people.
> It's to eliminate the .0 versions that people dislike so much.
Yup - so, from now on, they'll *only* be releasing x.0 versions...
>;-)
Cheerio,
Thomas
--
==> RH
Ed Wilts wrote:
And I suppose the whole world is confused by Microsoft's integer
numbering too?
Almost the whole world are sheep for Microsoft, so that moot.
The US consumer market currently understands integer numbering. After
all, you grew up with integers long before you realized that there w
-
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RHCE certifications and how current they are - answer below
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:25:49PM -0600, Rigler, Steve wrote:
> "Starting with Red Hat Linux 9 the numbering
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:25:49PM -0600, Rigler, Steve wrote:
> "Starting with Red Hat Linux 9 the numbering system for
> the consumer release will be stated only as an integer."
>
> So RH is trying to confuse everybody the same way Sun did with the Solaris
> version numbers.
And I suppose the
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 11:25, Rigler, Steve wrote:
> Interesting:
>
> "Starting with Red Hat Linux 9 the numbering system for
> the consumer release will be stated only as an integer."
>
> So RH is trying to confuse everybody the same way Sun did with the Solaris
> version numbers.
Yes, I'm su
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RHCE certifications and how current they are - answer below
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 07:21:09AM -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
> >>Its not the version number that people care about...the RHCE cert is based
> &g
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 07:21:09AM -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
> >>Its not the version number that people care about...the RHCE cert is based
> >>on version numbers. So the big jump in version numbers makes the cert
> >>worthless a lot faster!
>
>
> Those people haven't taken the 6 hour exam (most
10 matches
Mail list logo
