RE: Netware Support

2000-02-12 Thread Duncan Hill
On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Chad W. Skinner wrote: > This too would be a solution to my situation. If I have a web server > running linux and apache, could I not export via nfs the filesystem where > the website is located and mount these on the Netware box (just opposite > what you are doing). Would t

RE: Netware Support

2000-02-12 Thread Chad W. Skinner
This too would be a solution to my situation. If I have a web server running linux and apache, could I not export via nfs the filesystem where the website is located and mount these on the Netware box (just opposite what you are doing). Would this not make web access faster than mounting the fs f

Re: Netware Support

2000-02-11 Thread Duncan Hill
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, J. Scott Kasten wrote: > I would find it hard to beleive that Caldera would drop Netware support. > Caldera was an offshoot from Novel, and is the "Officially Netware > Compatible" distro. The only one that can claim that. It was dropped. Novell do provide NDS 8 for Linux,

Re: Netware Support

2000-02-11 Thread J. Scott Kasten
I would find it hard to beleive that Caldera would drop Netware support. Caldera was an offshoot from Novel, and is the "Officially Netware Compatible" distro. The only one that can claim that. On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 12:01:52PM -0500, Edward Marczak wrote: > on 10/2/2000 8:24 PM, Chad W. Skinne

Re: Netware Support

2000-02-11 Thread Edward Marczak
on 10/2/2000 8:24 PM, Chad W. Skinner shot down the bitstream: > After seeing a thread go across the list discussing methods of integrating > linux into a novell network I started looking around. It appears that > Caldera has stopped making Netware for linux. Can anyone confirm this. I bet Calde

Re: Netware support and Linux

1999-01-03 Thread Edward Marczak
on 4/11/99 10:02 PM, also sprach Edward Dekkers: >> 4) Are there any netware products for Linux other than mars_nwe that >> will look like a 5.0 server? Commercial or otherwise. > > No answer for you I'm afraid, but another question. (sorry about that). > > I was under the impression that mar

Re: Netware support and Linux

1999-01-03 Thread Sam Bayne
Edward Dekkers wrote: > Thank you gentlemen! > > Something else to play with! > > P.S. Speedwise compared to Samba/True Novell? (Just until I try it myself) I don't know about speed, but the flaky instability WRT windows95 clients takes it out of the running 'round here. It works great from dos

Re: Netware support and Linux

1999-01-02 Thread Edward Dekkers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, 5 November 1999 11:44 Subject: Re: Netware support and Linux > Yes, The fact is that mars-nwe is a novell 3.11(3.12) emulator. There is > really only one config file which is a little tricky to tweak but is doable. > &

Re: Netware support and Linux

1999-01-02 Thread johnsj20
Yes, The fact is that mars-nwe is a novell 3.11(3.12) emulator. There is really only one config file which is a little tricky to tweak but is doable. At 11:02 AM 11/5/99 +0800, you wrote: > > 4) Are there any netware products for Linux other than mars_nwe that > > will look like a 5.0 serve

Re: Netware support and Linux

1999-01-02 Thread Duncan Hill
On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, Edward Dekkers wrote: > I was under the impression that mars_nwe was to connect TO Netware x.xx > servers. Thats ncpfs/ncpmount. Mount your novell drives on a linux box. > Are you saying that it will allow my Linux to 'become' a Netware server? > (through emulation?). MARt

Re: Netware support and Linux

1999-01-02 Thread Edward Dekkers
> 4) Are there any netware products for Linux other than mars_nwe that > will look like a 5.0 server? Commercial or otherwise. No answer for you I'm afraid, but another question. (sorry about that). I was under the impression that mars_nwe was to connect TO Netware x.xx servers. Are you sayin