At 10:52 10/9/2003, you wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:59:30AM -0400, Michael Gargiullo wrote:
> >
> To add fuel to Christians fire. When Melissa came out, everything on a
> samba share got hosed as well.
Samba is a bastard protocol only necessary on mixed networks and only
due to MS's dominanc
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:43:00AM -0400, Christian Campbell wrote:
> > > I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
> > > MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
> > > software to "eliminate" the virus
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 03:29:16PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
>
> My argument wasn't the method of propagation or the difference between a
> virus and a worm. My response was to his assertion that you didn't need
> "virus" protection on a linux machine.
You
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:11:27PM -0700, Richard Crawford wrote:
>
> I've missed most of this thread, but it seemed to me that the point is
> that viruses don't spread on Linux via e-mail/attachments, the way that,
> say, Klez or Blaster do. The mechanism of Slapper's spread (and the very
> few
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 03:03:41PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > it?).
>
> Wow, Hal, guess've just slept the last year or so. Ever heard of Slapper?
> At one point it had infected at least 13,000 distinct machines:
>
> http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-27.html
$ dog http://www.cert.o
promise!"). :)
>
> Having said that, it's a good idea to have at least *some* degree of virus
> protection on your *nix system. Most infections have to be cleaned out by
> hand, but if you run a mail server (or even a little mailhost in your
> house like I do), it can be
unless it's supported by a heavy dose
of social engineering ("I promise, when you save this attachment and
change its permissions to executable and log in a root and run this
program, it'll be really really cool! I promise!"). :)
Having said that, it's a good idea to have
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:57:47AM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> >
> > Notice the word "Unix" above...
>
> ... find me someone -- anyone -- who has had a system infected
> via email+attached virus on a *nix system. A live person please, and
> not theories or reports from vendors with vested
> via email+attached virus on a *nix system. A live person please, and
> not theories or reports from vendors with vested interests protecting
> an entire industry built around really shoddily designed software.
> Over and above that, I don't beleive the inherent MS design flaw of
> auto-executing
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:59:30AM -0400, Michael Gargiullo wrote:
> >
> To add fuel to Christians fire. When Melissa came out, everything on a
> samba share got hosed as well.
Samba is a bastard protocol only necessary on mixed networks and only
due to MS's dominance, and anyone who can, is bet
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:57:47AM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
>
> Notice the word "Unix" above...
... find me someone -- anyone -- who has had a system infected
via email+attached virus on a *nix system. A live person please, and
not theories or reports from vendors with vested interests pr
On Thursday 09 October 2003 11:27, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:55:53AM -0400, rbragg wrote:
> > I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
> > MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
> > software
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 11:43, Christian Campbell wrote:
> > > I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
> > > MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
> > > software to "eliminate" the viruses. Anybody kn
- Original Message -
From: "rbragg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 7:55 AM
Subject: Virus protection
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
> MailScanner-4.23-1
> > I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
> > MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
> > software to "eliminate" the viruses. Anybody know of others?
>
> Linux does not need virus protection,
> > I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
> > MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
> > software to "eliminate" the viruses. Anybody know of others?
>
> Linux does not need virus protection,
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:55:53AM -0400, rbragg wrote:
>
> I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
> MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
> software to "eliminate" the viruses. Anybody know of others?
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, rbragg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
> MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
> software to "eliminate" the viruses. Anybody know of oth
rbragg wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
software to "eliminate" the viruses. Anybody know of others?
Thanks
rick
There is quite a bit about this in the a
Just plug-in clamav
-Original Message-
From: rbragg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Virus protection
Hi,
I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams th
Hi,
I'm looking around for open source virus protection software, I saw
MailScanner-4.23-11 but it seams that it needs additional 3rd party
software to "eliminate" the viruses. Anybody know of others?
Thanks
rick
--
Rick Bragg
Green Mountain Network
http://www.gmnet.net
--
redh
t;I know that there are products out there that I can use to protect the
>server and one or two email accounts but I am using my mail server to
>serve 2000 customers. I need virus protection that will protect all of
>them incoming and outgoing.
>
>Any good suggestions.??
>
From: "Francisco Neira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I use the same combo with >400 accounts on a small server and works like a
breeze.
me too, Postfix + Amavisd, but with Mc Affee's uvscan as antivirus
and at my prevoius job the mail server run the same with > 1500 accounts
regards,
juan
--
r
ramakrishna wrote:
> hi,
>
> * Scott Skrogstad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>>I know that there are products out there that I can use to protect the
>>server and one or two email accounts but I am using my mail server to
>>serve 2000 customers. I need virus pr
hi,
* Scott Skrogstad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I know that there are products out there that I can use to protect the
> server and one or two email accounts but I am using my mail server to
> serve 2000 customers. I need virus protection that will protect all of
> them
From: "Scott Skrogstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I know that there are products out there that I can use to protect the
> server and one or two email accounts but I am using my mail server to
> serve 2000 customers. I need virus protection that will protect all of
>
I know that there are products out there that I can use to protect the
server and one or two email accounts but I am using my mail server to
serve 2000 customers. I need virus protection that will protect all of
them incoming and outgoing.
Any good suggestions.??
--
Scott Skrogstad
Scott Skrogstad wrote:
>I run a small ISP and of course my customers have asked me to put up some
>virus protection on my server. I was just trying to get some info from
>the list what everyone is using. I am not a linux guru so something RPM
>would be nice and that has reg
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:18:07AM -0500, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
> I should be a little clearer on what I am trying to protect. I am really
> trying to protect the incoming and out going email of my users. Not so
> much the Linux box it self.
MailScanner has worked well for me. I've also con
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Scott Skrogstad wrote:
> I should be a little clearer on what I am trying to protect. I am really
> trying to protect the incoming and out going email of my users. Not so
> much the Linux box it self.
I've used InoculateIT in the past, works well. But it depends on the
; So, OMHO,
> bbsc,
> ism
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Scott Skrogstad
> Envoye : jeudi 16 mai 2002 14:40
> A : Red Hat Mailing list
> Objet : What are you doing for virus protection
>
>
> I run
ine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Scott Skrogstad
Envoye : jeudi 16 mai 2002 14:40
A : Red Hat Mailing list
Objet : What are you doing for virus protection
I run a small ISP and of course my customers have asked me to put up some
virus protection on my server.
I run a small ISP and of course my customers have asked me to put up some
virus protection on my server. I was just trying to get some info from
the list what everyone is using. I am not a linux guru so something RPM
would be nice and that has regular updates.
--
Scott Skrogstad
Computer
and far
between though, so I run both Mcafee and the HBEDV offering.
Regards
Enrico
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Graves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Redhat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 5:16 PM
Subject: Server Virus Protection
&g
http://www.hbedv.com/
eric
- Original Message -
Hey list,
I was wondering if there is any software (preferably free) that you can run
on a linux server (our mail server actually) that can detect and remove
Windows-based virii before a user checks their mail? I have to believe that
some
Hey list,
I was wondering if there is any software (preferably free) that you can run
on a linux server (our mail server actually) that can detect and remove
Windows-based virii before a user checks their mail? I have to believe that
some company has something like that by now. Thanks,
J
36 matches
Mail list logo
