Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote:
So after looking at the thread I started (the one about why RH90 is slower than
Win98) I came to conlusion that I will move people to Linux in stages. First I
want to change common use workstations to linux.
My question is, which WM will do best job
Hello,
you could use xfce. It is _realy_ fast and looks nice and modern.
I downloaded it yesterday, compiled it and installed it. Rather simple.
I am using kde 3.1 and it was realy a difference, how the windows popped
up and moved.
Right from the personal fealing it seams, that rograms start
Well I guess, I have to take a look at wm then...
Cornelius
T. Ribbrock wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:40:22AM +0200, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
you could use xfce. It is _realy_ fast and looks nice and modern.
Modern? If it still looks like CDE (which it did when I tried it a
couple of
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
and a couple of icons but I'll go with IceWM or XFCE since they're easy
to configure.
XFCE is nice when it's running, but getting it installed is a pain. Even
with the RPM's, there are *way* too many of them to consider it a newbie
installation.
Same here...
Having been influenced by what has been said in this thread, I decided to give a
try to WindowMaker / BlackBox / XCFE. As far as xfce is concerned, I only found
one RPM in SourceForge (and I don't think anything is missing).
I don't like too much, though - BlackBox seems to be my
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 07:13, Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote:
So after looking at the thread I started (the one about why RH90 is slower than
Win98) I came to conlusion that I will move people to Linux in stages. First I
want to change common use workstations to linux.
My question is,
Hi Apollo,
Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote:
So after looking at the thread I started (the one about why RH90 is slower than
Win98) I came to conlusion that I will move people to Linux in stages. First I
want to change common use workstations to linux.
Moving people to Linux in batches is -
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote:
Which window manager I should go with?
Personally, I'm using ROX with TWM, and it flies. Note that if you use
such a setup, you'll need to configure ROX's compatibility options to:
1. Overrride TWM's control of rox panels
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
Todd A. Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote:
Which window manager I should go with?
Personally, I'm using ROX with TWM, and it flies. Note that if you use
such a setup, you'll need to
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 10:25, Michael Scottaline wrote:
Give ratpoison a try. No eye-candy or decorations, but fully functional,
small footprint and fast as lightining!
Best,
Mike
Actually, wouldn't that be a great migration from WinXP? PINE/MUTT for
email,
10 matches
Mail list logo
