Le 27/06/2003 01:13, « Stephen Kuhn » [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 02:15, Nilesh Sahita wrote:
I tried using XFCE 4. Yet to determine whether it is faster than
GNOME/KDE.
However, the issue I have with XFCE 4 is that I can't find any menus
entries / launchers that I
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:14:23AM +0200, Zoki wrote:
*** The whole logic of changing a WM is not to have the same stufff as your
previous one.
[...]
I'd say that's true for everything except the menus... One might still
want to be able to access all programs installed... ;-)
Cheerio,
Thomas
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 19:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:14:23AM +0200, Zoki wrote:
*** The whole logic of changing a WM is not to have the same stufff as your
previous one.
[...]
I'd say that's true for everything except the menus... One might still
want to be
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:20:02PM +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:40:22AM +0200, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
you could use xfce. It is _realy_ fast and looks nice and modern.
Modern? If it still looks like CDE (which it did when I tried it a
couple of weeks ago), it looks
I use Window Maker, for my is the best one, it is so
fast, what about RAM...? for wm RAM is not a
problem...;-)
Regards
--- Cornelius_Kölbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió: Hello,
you could use xfce. It is _realy_ fast and looks
nice and modern.
I downloaded it yesterday, compiled it and
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:13:42PM -0500, Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote:
My question is, which WM will do best job (and will be fastest) to do this:
Desktop would just be with a graphic background (company name in the
background), there would be only several icons on the desktop to
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:12:41PM +0200, Manuel Aróstegui Ramirez wrote:
I use Window Maker, for my is the best one, it is so
fast, what about RAM...? for wm RAM is not a
problem...;-)
Right. Also, Window Maker is extremely easy to configure and there are
tons of themes available for it...
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:40:22AM +0200, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
you could use xfce. It is _realy_ fast and looks nice and modern.
Modern? If it still looks like CDE (which it did when I tried it a
couple of weeks ago), it looks rather outdated in my eyes... ;-)
But that's a matter of personal
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:20:02PM +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
Modern? If it still looks like CDE (which it did when I tried it a
couple of weeks ago), it looks rather outdated in my eyes... ;-)
Intrestingly enough, I feel it looks like Mac OS X, the most modern
operating system out there right
I tried using XFCE 4. Yet to determine whether it is faster than
GNOME/KDE.
However, the issue I have with XFCE 4 is that I can't find any menus
entries / launchers that I have in KDE or GNOME. Is there anyway to
import KDE / GNOME menus into XFCE desktop?
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 08:50, Brian
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 12:55, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
and a couple of icons but I'll go with IceWM or XFCE since they're easy
to configure.
XFCE is nice when it's running, but getting it installed is a pain. Even
with the RPM's, there are *way*
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:59:15AM +1000, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
emacs for a word processor...
Hmm... I think you mean emacs for a text editor and LaTeX for a word
processor... Now THAT almost scares even me... ;-)
Cheers,
--
Javier Gostling D.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 02:15, Nilesh Sahita wrote:
I tried using XFCE 4. Yet to determine whether it is faster than
GNOME/KDE.
However, the issue I have with XFCE 4 is that I can't find any menus
entries / launchers that I have in KDE or GNOME. Is there anyway to
import KDE / GNOME menus
Well, I am the guy who started this thread. XFCE is EXACTLY what I wanted. What
I did was I re-installed RH9.0 with KDE and Gnome programs I like and after that
did all 11 XFCE rpms! XFCE has almost everything I need, other stuff is taken
from KDE and XFCE launches it for me. I can tell you that I
So after looking at the thread I started (the one about why RH90 is slower than
Win98) I came to conlusion that I will move people to Linux in stages. First I
want to change common use workstations to linux.
My question is, which WM will do best job (and will be fastest) to do this:
Desktop would
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:13:42PM -0500, Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote:
[...]
My question is, which WM will do best job (and will be fastest) to do this:
Desktop would just be with a graphic background (company name in the
background), there would be only several icons on the desktop to
Apollo (Carmel Entertainment),
On Wednesday June 25, 2003 05:13, Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote:
So after looking at the thread I started (the one about why RH90 is slower
than Win98) I came to conlusion that I will move people to Linux in stages.
First I want to change common use
17 matches
Mail list logo
