Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-14 Thread Rob Hardowa
I wouldn't (again) blame it on redhat. If the link is missing you should create it...or just force a reinstall of the source and header packages and it should do it for you. I've installed kernels from tarballs on my own and recreated the link, and I just installed one on monday from rpms and

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-14 Thread Vidiot
I wouldn't (again) blame it on redhat. If the link is missing you should create it...or just force a reinstall of the source and header packages and it should do it for you. I've installed kernels from tarballs on my own and recreated the link, and I just installed one on monday from rpms and

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-14 Thread Statux
What the Hell is this crap? /usr/include/linux/errno.h definately does not exist on this system. make sure you have /usr/include/linux soft linked to /usr/src/linux/include/linux like this: lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 28 Apr 21 01:07 /usr/include/linux -

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-14 Thread Bob Taylor
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vidiot writes: I wouldn't (again) blame it on redhat. If the link is missing you should create it...or just force a reinstall of the source and header packages and it should do it for you. I've installed kernels from tarballs on my own and recreated the link,

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-14 Thread Vidiot
What the Hell is this crap? /usr/include/linux/errno.h definately does not exist on this system. make sure you have /usr/include/linux soft linked to /usr/src/linux/include/linux like this: lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 28 Apr 21 01:07 /usr/include/linux -

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-14 Thread Uncle Meat
On 14-Sep-2000 Vidiot spoke something to the effect: On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Vidiot wrote: What the Hell is this crap? /usr/include/linux/errno.h definately does not exist on this system. Personally I'd say redhat broke this. So, how do I fix it ASAP? /usr/include/linux/errno.h *crap* is

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-14 Thread Statux
It all comes down to the soft links being missing. It really is only minor when you consider the small amount of time it takes to put them back. The kernel and kernel related items, in my opinion, should not be handled by RPMs... the kernel and RPMs are a messy messy combo. Statux :)

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-14 Thread Jeff Hogg
-Original Message- From: Ray Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, September 14, 2000 12:44 AM Subject: Re: Who broke GCC compiling ... "v" == Vidiot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: v In file included from /usr/include/err

GCC confusion - was Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-14 Thread Vidiot
Definitely not a redhat problem seeing as how redhat does not distribute gnu gcc as tarballs in the first place...if you are unhappy with your compiler for some reason (gcc is included in the rpm), then go to an update mirror and download the latest version of egcs...which should be 1.1.2-30 and

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-14 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Vidiot wrote: Wrong. No compiler building should require that kernel sources be installed. Many things can be compiled that do not require the kernel sources. All of the necessary include files for getting ANYTHING to compile should be distributed as part of the system.

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-14 Thread Vidiot
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Vidiot wrote: Wrong. No compiler building should require that kernel sources be installed. Many things can be compiled that do not require the kernel sources. All of the necessary include files for getting ANYTHING to compile should be distributed as part of the system.

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-14 Thread Rob Hardowa
Just a quick note... It's been a long time since I studied compilers, and a brief time at that, so I'm not really qualified to give you any information other than an opinionso I offer this... A standard user space program that only uses regular C library functions should not require the

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-14 Thread Steve Borho
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:54:50PM -0400, Rob Hardowa wrote: Just a quick note... It's been a long time since I studied compilers, and a brief time at that, so I'm not really qualified to give you any information other than an opinionso I offer this... A standard user space program

Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-13 Thread Vidiot
... Red Hat or GNU? System: RH 6.2 Installed the following GCC tarballs: gcc-core-2.95.2.tar.gz gcc-java-2.95.2.tar.gz gcc-2.95.2.tar.gz gcc-g++-2.95.2.tar.gz Did a ./configure and then a make using the gcc that comes with RH6.2 and got: make[1]: Entering directory

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-13 Thread Hossein S. Zadeh
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Vidiot wrote: What the Hell is this crap? /usr/include/linux/errno.h definately does not exist on this system. Personally I'd say redhat broke this. So, how do I fix it ASAP? /usr/include/linux/errno.h *crap* is part of linux kernel. And personally I'd think you

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-13 Thread Ray Curtis
"v" == Vidiot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: v In file included from /usr/include/errno.h:36, v from fnmatch.c:46: v /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or directory v make[1]: *** [fnmatch.o] Error 1 v make[1]: Leaving directory

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-13 Thread Vidiot
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, you wrote: /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [fnmatch.o] Error 1 Sounds to me like you are missing the kernel headers. Install the kernel source and make sure that /usr/include/linux is a symlink to

Re: Who broke GCC compiling ...

2000-09-13 Thread Vidiot
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, you wrote: /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [fnmatch.o] Error 1 Sounds to me like you are missing the kernel headers. Install the kernel source and make sure that /usr/include/linux is a symlink to