Hi Sean,
I have repeated the process and the problem still remained same.
My config file also consists CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y as you said.
Is my process of compiling kernel correct? Or is there any change in
RH9?
Nabin Limbu
On 25 Sep 2003 at 10:18, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
Hi Nabin,
Make
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 04:50, Nabin Limbu wrote:
Hi Sean,
I have repeated the process and the problem still remained same.
My config file also consists CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y as you said.
Is my process of compiling kernel correct? Or is there any change in
RH9?
Nabin Limbu
Use make
Hi all,
I have upgraded my kernel to 2.4.20-20.9 via up2date with no problem
in RH 9. In this new kernel, I wanted to enable a cyclades card in
kernel for which I complied this kernel as below:-
- make menuconfig
- enabled Cyclades card in the menu
- make dep; make clean
- make bzImage
- make
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 19:58:11 +0530
Nabin Limbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have upgraded my kernel to 2.4.20-20.9 via up2date with no problem
in RH 9. In this new kernel, I wanted to enable a cyclades card in
kernel for which I complied this kernel as below:-
- make menuconfig
-
Hi,
I have compiled the kernel 2.2.16 kernel using kgcc successfully. I am
using
software raid1 with scsi disks. I also compiled raid1 and scsi support and
aic7XXX driver for adaptec scsi card in a kernel (not as a module). Then I
made a initrd image and change the configuration in lilo.conf
Kapil Sharma wrote:
Hi,
I have compiled the kernel 2.2.16 kernel using kgcc successfully. I am
using
software raid1 with scsi disks. I also compiled raid1 and scsi support and
aic7XXX driver for adaptec scsi card in a kernel (not as a module). Then I
made a initrd image and change the
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Marco Presi wrote:
I upgraded to RH7 last week, and I'm not able to compile kernel.
Nor the 2.2.16-22 shipped with RH, nor the 2.2.17 from kernel.org
Some other person had my same problem.
Some one knows why?
Search archives. Archives say 'Redhat 7.0 shipped with a
Marco Presi said once upon a time (Tue, 5 Dec 2000):
Hello all
I upgraded to RH7 last week, and I'm not able to compile kernel.
Nor the 2.2.16-22 shipped with RH, nor the 2.2.17 from kernel.org
Some other person had my same problem.
Some one knows why?
Yes, you didn't read the
Hello all
I upgraded to RH7 last week, and I'm not able to compile kernel.
Nor the 2.2.16-22 shipped with RH, nor the 2.2.17 from kernel.org
Some other person had my same problem.
Some one knows why?
--
Ciao Ciao
Marco
Hi, I would like to know what would be the most
stressing compiling method? I recall going to the Tom's Hardware website
and he mention something about the test he performed such as compiling the Linux
Kernel to test the stability of the overclocked CPU. I wanted to test my
underclocked
just wondering if there is an "update/current" page anywhere on the
issue of kernel compiling...
I'm using redhat 6.2 ...
sometimes I have no luck.getting unresolved symbols and don't
remember what causes them
basically I just copied over new system.map and bz
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, lee johnson wrote:
just wondering if there is an "update/current" page anywhere on the
issue of kernel compiling...
I'm using redhat 6.2 ...
sometimes I have no luck.getting unresolved symbols and don't
remember what causes them
b
i'm NOT running lilo tired of it messing with my boot sector and not
being able to get into windows anymore ...geez
so i'm going through loadlin.
1) Not getting into Windows is a good thing.. why use it when you have
Linux?:)
2) lilo will start DOS (which will then load Windows)... I've
1) Not getting into Windows is a good thing.. why use it when you have
Linux?:)
roflol.yuppers..well i gotta have windows at least "at the
moment".
i have some games for friends over lan/enternet but mainly for apps like
access
AND mainly my scannercanonscan USB is NOT
basically I just copied over new system.map and bzImage file renaming to
my current set of modules..
isn't this right?
No, it isn't. When you compile a new kernel, you also need to compile a
new set of modules. IF you are compiling another copy of the same kernel
version,
Brian,
That nothing to worry about, you could even live with it, but since it's
not nice:
there is a file /etc/conf.modules, which is used by modprobe on startup to
look for modules that should be loaded give information to them ...
I'm not sure when it is generated, at some point definitly
On Fri, 29 May 1998, Claire Bradford wrote: -Ray Curtis wrote: - -
"r" == ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - - r
- r This message
was not delivered to - r [EMAIL PROTECTED] - r TFS Admin was
informed with a copy of this message - r Sender was
Hello all. I just recompiled my kernel, loaded it onto a floppy and
booted it. It works fine and does what it's supposed to (mostly). But it
doesn't make the new kernel image the permenent one. Unless I boot from
the floppy, it returns to the old kernel. I tried messing around with the
Hello all. I just recompiled my kernel, loaded it onto a floppy and
booted it. It works fine and does what it's supposed to (mostly). But it
doesn't make the new kernel image the permenent one. Unless I boot from
the floppy, it returns to the old kernel. I tried messing around with the
lilo,
snip
after I reboot I get a slew of unresolved symbols flying across the
screen, did I miss something?
Thanks In advance
These unresolved sybols are of the modules that you didn't compile in the
kernel. Just remove them.
Brian
Igmar
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the
Ray Curtis wrote:
"r" == ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
r
r This message was not delivered to
r [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r TFS Admin was informed with a copy of this message
r Sender was informed with a copy of this message
r
See our previous posts, under the subject "Problematic Postings"
or similar.
---
Matt Housh email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MicroComputer SpecialistUniversity of Tulsa
hi Claire, hi all,
Claire Bradford wrote:
Ray Curtis wrote:
"r" == ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
r
r This message was not delivered to
r [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r TFS Admin was informed with a copy of this message
r Sender was
I have been trying to recompile the kernel, using the source that comes with
RedHat 5 (i.e. 2.0.32). I have applied the fat32 patch which I obtained
from:
http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/people/chaffee/fat32.html
after doing:
make mrproper
make kernelconfig
make dep; make clean
make zImage
I get the
On Sat, 2 May 1998, Cam Vetter wrote:
I have been trying to recompile the kernel, using the source that comes with
RedHat 5 (i.e. 2.0.32). I have applied the fat32 patch which I obtained
from:
cut
Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong and what I need to do to fix it. I
know the fat32
On Sat, 02 May 1998, Cam Vetter wrote:
vfatfs_syms.c:69: redefinition of `vfat_fs_type'
vfatfs_syms.c:15: `vfat_fs_type' previously defined here
vfatfs_syms.c:78: redefinition of `vfat_syms'
vfatfs_syms.c:24: `vfat_syms' previously defined here
This looks suspiciously like if a stray #include
26 matches
Mail list logo
