On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:59:27AM -0700, Ian L wrote:
> I dont suppose there is a free utility that will let me copy a 10gig hd
> onto a new 120gb hard drive?
>
> There is only a single partition on the 10gb drive. I would either like to
> copy that into 10gb partition on th
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:59:27AM -0700, Ian L wrote:
>> I dont suppose there is a free utility that will let me copy a 10gig
>> hd onto a new 120gb hard drive?
>>
>> There is only a single partition on the 10gb drive. I would either
>> like to copy that int
only a single partition on the 10gb drive. I would either
> >>> like to copy that into 10gb partition on the new drive, or just make
> >>> a 120gb partition on the new drive and copy that over.
> >>
> >> I haven't tried it (yet), but I've heard l
Use parted. Should work fine.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Ian L
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: copy old drive to new drive
>
> I dont suppose there is a free
I dont suppose there is a free utility that will let me copy a 10gig hd
onto a new 120gb hard drive?
There is only a single partition on the 10gb drive. I would either like to
copy that into 10gb partition on the new drive, or just make a 120gb
partition on the new drive and copy that over
; like to copy that into 10gb partition on the new drive, or just make
>>> a 120gb partition on the new drive and copy that over.
>>
>> I haven't tried it (yet), but I've heard lots of good things about
>> Mondo Rescue - visit http://www.mondorescue.org.
>&g
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:59:27AM -0700, Ian L wrote:
> I dont suppose there is a free utility that will let me copy a 10gig hd
> onto a new 120gb hard drive?
>
> There is only a single partition on the 10gb drive. I would either like to
> copy that into 10gb partition on th
I dont suppose there is a free utility that will let me copy a 10gig hd
onto a new 120gb hard drive?
There is only a single partition on the 10gb drive. I would either like to
copy that into 10gb partition on the new drive, or just make a 120gb
partition on the new drive and copy that over
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 19:39, Marc Dobler wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> thanks for reply.
> i understand your precedure. i did the same also.
> i am still confused. my RH doesn't recognize the fat32 partition ...
>
> Marc
>
marc-
post the output of
fdisk -l /dev/hda
you will need to be root o
Hi Patrick,
thanks for reply.
i understand your precedure. i did the same also.
i am still confused. my RH doesn't recognize the fat32 partition ...
Marc
Le mer 05/03/2003 à 04:29, Patrick Nelson a écrit :
>
> had a 80gb hd and with windows me partitioned it to 40gb in the first
> partition
Marc Dobler wrote:
-
Oh Really ??!!
i wonder how you did it ...
... any trick ?
please tell me how you've proceeded ...
-
No hacks
had a 80gb hd and with windows me partitioned it to 40gb in the first
partition. in Linux then used fdisk to partition
Oh Really ??!!
i wonder how you did it ...
... any trick ?
please tell me how you've proceeded ...
cheers,
Marc
Le mar 04/03/2003 à 14:49, Patrick Nelson a écrit :
> -
> I've had success up to 40GB on a number of drives. Added a slew of 80GB
> drives recently and h
marc dobler wrote:
-
i did the same some age ago (HD 120Go on dual RH+XP).
RH8 recognizes FAT32 partitions BELOW 20 Go.
i tested different configurations, but no way.
so, you should make 6 or 7 partitions of max 20 Go,
using Partition Magic or Swisknife (freeware) on Win.
day, March 03, 2003 5:54 PM
Subject: RE: new drive
> Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> ->>>>
> What is the output of "fdisk -l /dev/hdb"?
> Does using "auto" instead of "vfat" solve the problem?
> Does the directory /dosd exist?
> -
type is not so secure for Win.
WARNING : for each part, the size in Mo must be without digits.
this is also a source of problems for the size recognition of RH8.
hope this helps,
Marc
Le mar 04/03/2003 à 03:19, Patrick Nelson a écrit :
> RH80
>
> Added a new drive WD120GB to system
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
-
What is the output of "fdisk -l /dev/hdb"?
Does using "auto" instead of "vfat" solve the problem?
Does the directory /dosd exist?
-
1. fdisk out:
Disk /dev/hdb: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 14593 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 5
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 10:19:10AM -0800, Patrick Nelson wrote:
>
> but when I try to mount the drive like:
> mount -t vfat /dev/hdb1 /dosd
> I get an error:
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdb1
>or too many mounted file systems
What is the output of "fdisk -l
RH80
Added a new drive WD120GB to system that dual boots (win98 and RH80). dmesg
displays that it there. fdisk shows its there with pretty much the same
criteria as the other (mountable) fat partition. Cant see anything wrong,
but when I try to mount the drive like:
mount -t vfat /dev/hdb1
On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 07:25:42PM -0700, Bill Hartwell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Saturday 24 November 2001 06:33 pm, Ian Truelsen wrote:
> > I am getting a new drive for my server. What is the best way to transfer my
> > system from
On Sat, 2001-11-24 at 20:25, Bill Hartwell wrote:
> On Saturday 24 November 2001 06:33 pm, Ian Truelsen wrote:
> > I am getting a new drive for my server. What is the best way to transfer my
> > system from one drive to another, so that I don't have to reinstall
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 24 November 2001 06:33 pm, Ian Truelsen wrote:
> I am getting a new drive for my server. What is the best way to transfer my
> system from one drive to another, so that I don't have to reinstall
> everything?
I'm
.
Fred
Eric Clover wrote:
>
> hello,
> i moved / (hda5) to a new drive (hdc1) and now for some reason some of
> my config files will/can not be read. i copied the old / to hdc1 with
> cp -ax * /newdrive , edited lilo.conf, edited fstab and all went well.
> but for some reason a
the new / (hdc1) had been installed and running already as /backup and
had been chown'd to clover:root and chmod'd to 700.
SO, . & .. on / were clover:root 700
Doh!!
hehehe
Eric Clover wrote:
>
> hello,
> i moved / (hda5) to a new drive (hdc1) and now for some rea
hello,
i moved / (hda5) to a new drive (hdc1) and now for some reason some of
my config files will/can not be read. i copied the old / to hdc1 with
cp -ax * /newdrive , edited lilo.conf, edited fstab and all went well.
but for some reason a few of my configs will not load or tell me that
they can
really old drive and NOT UDMA (and the new drive is UDMA) then put
the old drive as the primary on the secondary controller (and if you have a
IDE cdrom put it as slave on the secondary controller). Just an idea. Also
during the Redhat 6 install (clean install, I dont do unix upgrades, sure
someone el
round?
If what you want to do is to install RH 6.1 and windows in your new drive, you
can keep RH 4.2 in the drive you already have. Windows should be mounted before
Linux. I have installed win/linux drives, but never with a previous linux
install I want to keep. What I would try for doing this is
I'm a non-programmer who's been struggling happily with my linux box
for a couple of years now.
I need to get a bigger hard-drive. Also, I was hoping to upgrade from
redhat 4.2 to redhat 6.1 or whatever the latest release is. I also
need to install windows 98 on the new hard-drive--for work-relat
On Sun, 29 Mar 1998, Pork E. Pigg wrote:
> Heath Doane wrote:
> > Greetings All,
> >
> > I am getting a little cramped for space, and I was thinking of moving
> > my /usr to a new drive. What I had in mind was mounting the new drive
> > as a temp. d
On Mon, 30 Mar 1998, Dustin Tennill wrote:
> Heath Doane wrote:
>
> > Greetings All,
> >
> > I am getting a little cramped for space, and I was thinking of moving
> > my /usr to a new drive. What I had in mind was mounting the new drive
> > as a temp
Heath Doane wrote:
> Greetings All,
>
> I am getting a little cramped for space, and I was thinking of moving
> my /usr to a new drive. What I had in mind was mounting the new drive
> as a temp. directory on the root, copying the /usr structure over to the
> new drive,
Phil Risby wrote:
> Pork E. Pigg wrote:
>
> > I did just that (almost) moving /home. I simply copied everything to the
> > new drive, renamed /home to /home2 and named the new one /home. My
> > method required a reboot and a mount of the new drive. There may be a
>
pace, and I was thinking of moving
> > my /usr to a new drive. What I had in mind was mounting the new drive
> > as a temp. directory on the root, copying the /usr structure over to the
> > new drive, renaming the /usr to something (like /usr-old) just as a CYA
> > thing..
Heath Doane wrote:
>
> Thanks for using NetForward!
> http://www.netforward.com
> v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
>
> Greetings All,
>
> I am getting a little cramped for space, and I was thinking of moving
> my /usr to a new dri
Greetings All,
I am getting a little cramped for space, and I was thinking of moving
my /usr to a new drive. What I had in mind was mounting the new drive
as a temp. directory on the root, copying the /usr structure over to the
new drive, renaming the /usr to something (like /usr-old
34 matches
Mail list logo
