On Sat, 2003-07-05 at 19:42, Julian Gomez wrote:
> >up2date is your friend. You should not try to download the errata
> >yourself unless there's a good reason you can't use up2date.
>
> I know, but is a problem.
Try then apt or yum instead?
http://freshrpms.net/
http://www.linux.duke.edu
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 06:37:19AM -0500, Ed Wilts spoke thusly:
>On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 09:47:19PM +0800, Julian Gomez wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:05:04AM -0400, Edwin Robertson spoke thusly:
>> >You didn't do -Fvh with the kernel did you? If so, that would cause any
>> >version of Red
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 09:47:19PM +0800, Julian Gomez wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:05:04AM -0400, Edwin Robertson spoke thusly:
> >> I've had a machine which I planned to put into production (Samba) -- and
> >> just now tried to run the full 'rpm -Fvh' against all the latest errata.
> >> Un
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:59:04AM -0400, Edwin Robertson spoke thusly:
>Using rpm to upgrade your running kernel is a really bad idea no matter
>what version of Red Hat, especially if you are using scsi. Basically what
Yes, SCSI. That's the only difference between my current desktops and the
se
Using rpm to upgrade your running kernel is a really bad idea no matter what
version of Red Hat, especially if you are using scsi. Basically what it
does is rip the modules for the running kernel right out and install the new
kernel modules. In the case of scsi, you can write the initrd because y
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:05:04AM -0400, Edwin Robertson spoke thusly:
>> I've had a machine which I planned to put into production (Samba) -- and
>> just now tried to run the full 'rpm -Fvh' against all the latest errata.
>> Unfortunately for me, eventhough 'rpm --test -F *.rpm' worked without an
> I've had a machine which I planned to put into production (Samba) -- and
> just now tried to run the full 'rpm -Fvh' against all the latest errata.
> Unfortunately for me, eventhough 'rpm --test -F *.rpm' worked without any
> errors, doing 'rpm -Fvh *.rpm' returned ALOT of segfaulted package
upda
Hello,
I've had a machine which I planned to put into production (Samba) -- and
just now tried to run the full 'rpm -Fvh' against all the latest errata.
Unfortunately for me, eventhough 'rpm --test -F *.rpm' worked without any
errors, doing 'rpm -Fvh *.rpm' returned ALOT of segfaulted package upda
> I have an NFS directory that contains all of the RPM updates that you
> can download from any mirror. On a freshly installed system (same
> version as the RPMs), can I simply run 'rpm -Uvh NFS_DIR/*' and
> assume it'll update only those packages installed o
Werner Puschitz wrote:
> rpm -Uhv will install/upgrade all of the RPMs.
> You need to use rpm -Fvh which updates only those RPMs which are currently
> installed. Those RPMs which are not installed but included in the list
> will not be updated.
Thank you very much!
--
H | "Life is the art o
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>
> I have an NFS directory that contains all of the RPM updates that you can
>download from any mirror. On a freshly installed system (same version as the RPMs),
>can I simply run 'rpm -Uvh NFS_DIR/*' and assume i
I have an NFS directory that contains all of the RPM updates that you can download
from any mirror. On a freshly installed system (same version as the RPMs), can I
simply run 'rpm -Uvh NFS_DIR/*' and assume it'll update only those packages installed
on that new system, or
Hi,
> Just a side question. Did you (or anyone else) ever try to rebuild the
> instimage dir? Any good docs on this that you can recommend?
It seems I am in the wrong thread ;-).
Bye,
Leonard.
Hi Vincent,
> That means that I'm following the patches for every RH
> version very closely since we auto-modify the base distributions on the install
> servers in order to provide pre-patched installable distributions.. (except for
> RH6.2, of course, since the new rh6.2 packages
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 10:01:35PM +1000, Matthew Melvin wrote:
> P.S.
>
> I can definitly sympathise with the rpm4 problem with rh6.2 - at WC we
> rebuild all the recent redhat errata on a rpm3 system for folding back into
> our kickstart installs. Lather, Rinse, Repeat.
I'm curious - I have n
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 10:01:35PM +1000, Matthew Melvin wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2001 at 5:04am (-0500), Vincent Cojot wrote:
[...]
> I can't speak to the general issue except to say that the basic scheme being
> that 'bigger' is 'newer'. But in this particular case there was already a
> sendmail
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001 at 5:04am (-0500), Vincent Cojot wrote:
>
> Hello list, hello redhat packagers (if any are reading this list),
>
[...]
> Here is what I mean (from RHSA-2001:106-08):
>
> RH7.1 RH7.0 RH6.2
> Prev. sendmail verion:8.11.6-1.7
Hello list, hello redhat packagers (if any are reading this list),
I work for a european e-broker where we have over 200 production
and dev servers with RH 6.1, 6.2, 7.1 and soon 7.2.. (we bought quite a
few rh boxed sets but no support, unfortunately). In order to support this
massive
On 05-Jan-2001 Chuck Carson opined:
>
> I just had a very interesting time trying to install some updates. I
> have a
> cherry installed RH 6.2 box, installed with no GUI stuff what-so-ever.
> I
> applied all the updates from the update site except for any of the
> kernel
> updates. Several of t
I just had a very interesting time trying to install some updates. I have a
cherry installed RH 6.2 box, installed with no GUI stuff what-so-ever. I
applied all the updates from the update site except for any of the kernel
updates. Several of them bombed because they were dependent upon X librari
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 10:28:51AM +1100, Darryl Harvey wrote:
> Where do I go to get the definitive list of RPM updates (or security
> updates) since the release of RH6.1
For packages:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/updates/6.1/
ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/updates/6.1/ (mirror, gen
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Darryl Harvey wrote:
> Where do I go to get the definitive list of RPM updates (or security
> updates) since the release of RH6.1
--
Aaron Turner, Core Developer http://vodka.linuxkb.org/~aturner/
Linux Knowledg
Where do I go to get the definitive list of RPM updates (or security
updates) since the release of RH6.1
Thanks
Darryl
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
take a look at autorpm it will do this and more.
Bret
Steve wrote:
>
> Is there a way to update more than 1 rpm at a time via ftp. I just installed
> 6.1 on a fresh box and wanted to update the rpm's vi updates.redhat.com and it
> seems very tedious to do it 1 at a time.
>
> TIA
> Steve
>
> -
Is there a way to update more than 1 rpm at a time via ftp. I just installed
6.1 on a fresh box and wanted to update the rpm's vi updates.redhat.com and it
seems very tedious to do it 1 at a time.
TIA
Steve
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
25 matches
Mail list logo
