- Original Message -
From: Kaushal Shriyan (kaushalshri...@gmail.com)
Date: 13-09-23 02:31
To: r...@ronno.nl, General Red Hat Linux discussion list
(redhat-list@redhat.com)
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Apply security updates offline on Red Hat Enterprise Linux
release 8.7 (Ootpa) in Production environment
H
H
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 7:19 AM Kaushal Shriyan
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:32 AM R. de Kuijer wrote:
>
>> The Spacewalk project (Satellite version 5) indeed stopped last year.
>> Only Oracle stil uses it for their OL distribution for updates.
>>
>> Follow-up is the Katello/Foreman
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:32 AM R. de Kuijer wrote:
> The Spacewalk project (Satellite version 5) indeed stopped last year.
> Only Oracle stil uses it for their OL distribution for updates.
>
> Follow-up is the Katello/Foreman project you can use freely, or Satellite6
> for the licensed.
>
> The
17:16
To: Mike Burger (mbur...@bubbanfriends.org)
Cc: General Red Hat Linux discussion list (redhat-list@redhat.com)
Subject: Re: Apply security updates offline on Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
8.7 (Ootpa) in Production environment
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 7:12 PM Mike Burger
wrote:
>
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 7:12 PM Mike Burger
wrote:
> Have you considered setting up a Spacewalk (free) or Satellite
> (licensed) server, in your envinronment?
>
> This way, you could use it as an internet connected, central repository
> to pull in all of the patches, and then your internal system
repository instead of
reaching out, directly, to Red Hat's servers over the internet.
On 2023-09-11 06:04, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi,
Further to the earlier email, is there a way to list security related
vulnerabilities for production environment offline systems which are
not
connected t
Hi,
Further to the earlier email, is there a way to list security related
vulnerabilities for production environment offline systems which are not
connected to the Internet?
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 8:09 AM Kaushal Shriyan
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 12:58 AM Matty Sar
at, Sep 9, 2023, 12:49 PM Kaushal Shriyan
> wrote:
>
>
Hi Matty,
Thanks for your response. I have run the below command. What I have
observed is that it is updating all the packages.
#yum update --downloadonly --downloaddir=/root/rhel8securityupdates
Output of above command -> https
the packages to the target system in a given directory.
Then to install navigate to the directory and run "yum local install *.rpm"
and it'll update.
-Matty
On Sat, Sep 9, 2023, 12:49 PM Kaushal Shriyan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to apply the security updates offli
Hi,
Is there a way to apply the security updates offline on Red Hat Enterprise
Linux release 8.7 (Ootpa) as it is a production environment?
yum list-security --security
yum -y update --security
Please guide me. Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards,
Kaushal
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 09:30, Rik Thomas wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 15:36, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
> > >
> > > But friends will let friends use the number 5 "Most Critical Internet
> > > Security Threat" (http://www.sans.org/top20/top10.php)?
> >
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 15:44, Mike Klein wrote:
> Using kfind (file and content searching util in kde) I decided to
> check/scan some key directories for my root password and the password of
> my user account (what I use when I'm not root). I was
> embarassed by what I found.
Much of what you'v
Using kfind (file and content searching util in kde) I decided to
check/scan some key directories for my root password and the password of
my user account (what I use when I'm not root). I was
embarassed by what I found.
I found my root password in cleartext in the following files:
/etc/lilo.
Consensus
(8 October 2003)
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its counterparts in the
UK and Canada have joined the SANS Institute in releasing a list of the
top 20 security vulnerabilities most frequently exploited in Windows,
Unix and Linux. This list is notable for its "multinat
ebmin and save
yourself a lot of time.
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: "Winanjaya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 12:40:22 +0700
Subject: Re: Sendmail, Security
> I think you have to check your mail/access file for
I think you have to check your mail/access file for deny RELAY
Good luck
Winan
- Original Message -
From: "Redhat Man" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:45 AM
Subject: Sendmail, Security
> Dear All,
>
> I
Dear All,
I am using MTA " sendmail 8.12.6" in my mail server. I got headache that
getting unnecessary Outgoing mail transferring...
So, I don't want to give allow SMTP server to other users, which is
from different ISP..
How can I do this Any bodies know please ??
And also how can I make limit
what you need).
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Wade Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Telnet Server to integrate into Windows 2000/2003
security.running on Linux.
I should add that I wanted the Telnet serv
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Wade Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Telnet Server to integrate into Windows 2000/2003
> security.running on Linux.
>
>
> I should add that I
security.
Hello,
I am looking for a telnet server which can be configured to use a
windows 2000/2003 network security to login/authenticate. Does anyone
know of one out there, or does anyone know if it is possible to some how
get RH to do this itself? Please advise.
Thank You,
Wade Chandler
Hello,
I am looking for a telnet server which can be configured to use a
windows 2000/2003 network security to login/authenticate. Does anyone
know of one out there, or does anyone know if it is possible to some how
get RH to do this itself? Please advise.
Thank You,
Wade Chandler
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:55:25PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:44:59PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > Okay, thanks! Next question: I ran that find command from the root
> > directory, and found thirty executables with that suid bit set. Some I
> > can tell need it (s
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 08:16, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> On many of the INSTALL and README documents that come with source
> tarballs, they talk about compiling with 'make', then running 'make
> install' as root. I was scanning some security documents the other day
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:44:59PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> Okay, thanks! Next question: I ran that find command from the root
> directory, and found thirty executables with that suid bit set. Some I
> can tell need it (sudo, suexec), some I think I can just delete (rlogin,
> rsh, rcp),
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:16:30PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> uestion, but I got to thinking...
>
> On many of the INSTALL and README documents that come with source
> tarballs, they talk about compiling with 'make', then running 'make
> install' as
Okay, this may be a stupid question, but I got to thinking...
On many of the INSTALL and README documents that come with source
tarballs, they talk about compiling with 'make', then running 'make
install' as root. I was scanning some security documents the other day,
and s
be built into the rpm being verified.
rpm -qa --queryformat "echo \'-\' ; echo \'Verifying
%{GROUP}/%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}.rpm --noscripts\' ; rpm -Vv --noscripts
%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} ; sleep 1 ; if \[ -f core \]; then exit 1 ; fi\n&qu
put them. And I su to root before I do so, because my
normal
> > account doesn't have access to that folder. Which means that I'm
> > compiling my sources as root, then installing them.
> >
> > Is this a bad security hole? Do I need to somehow set up a
'com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 28 July 2003 19:47, Haley Crowe wrote:
> I'm getting the same message this morning.
>
> HCC
>
This is spam. Someone plays a joke.
- --
Tb. Rifza Adriansyah
Public Key is available on request.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 12:57, Ed Wilts wrote:
> Refused connections have nothing to do with being a spammer. They have
> a poorly configured mail system (currently), but by the looks of their
> home page, they're a legitimate commercial company.
While you are correct, connecting in this manner w
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Aly Dharshi
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a
messagecontainin g prohibited content
Hello,
I think that its called SpamAssassin, Exim + Exiscan + Sophos or
some
fav
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message
> containin g prohibited content
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 10:03:42AM -0400, D
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message
containin g prohibited content
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 10:03:42AM -0400, David Hart wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 09:54, MKli
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 10:03:42AM -0400, David Hart wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 09:54, MKlinke wrote:
> > On Monday 28 July 2003 07:40, Cowles, Steve wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > containing prohibited content (SYM:23953231121286250666)
> > > >
> > > >
> Sturman is apparently a
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Symantec Mail Security
> detected that you sent a message containing prohibited content
> (SYM:33731228931617092356)]
>
> Maybe SturmanIndustries.com has taken SCO's FUD to heart and is blocking
> anything Red Hat and/o
Cowles, Steve wrote:
> detecte d that you sent a message containing prohibited content
>
>
> Rizzuto, Alan wrote:
>> (SYM:33731228931617092356)]
>>
>>
>> My apologies - our new EXCHANGE email server had a new version of
>> Symantec loaded that was blocking all redhat-list messages as spam -
>>
Rizzuto, Alan wrote:
> (SYM:33731228931617092356)]
>
>
> My apologies - our new EXCHANGE email server had a new version of
> Symantec loaded that was blocking all redhat-list messages as spam -
> we have it resolved now - sorry for the unrequested responses. Alan
> Rizzuto
>
Thank you for your
Of Mike Pelley
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Symantec Mail Security
detected that you sent a message containing prohibited content
(SYM:33731228931617092356)]
Maybe SturmanIndustries.com has taken SCO's FUD to heart and is blo
user ;)
>
> - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
>
> X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thread-index: AcNVA2GiMYS4W180QyeKT0pJUKw/8g==
> Thread-Topic: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message
> containing prohibi
Kw/8g==
Thread-Topic: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containing
prohibited content(SYM:33731228931617092356)
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message cont
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 09:54, MKlinke wrote:
> On Monday 28 July 2003 07:40, Cowles, Steve wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > containing prohibited content (SYM:23953231121286250666)
> > >
> > >
Sturman is apparently a SPAMMER. I have a bunch of connections that we
refused.
Jul 28 08:27:53 m
On Monday 28 July 2003 07:40, Cowles, Steve wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > containing prohibited content (SYM:23953231121286250666)
> >
> >
> > Subject of the message: RE: getting dns ip automatically
> > Recipient of the message: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> You've got
I'm getting the same message this morning.
HCC
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/28/03 07:40AM >>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> containing prohibited content (SYM:23953231121286250666)
>
>
> Subject of the message: RE: getting dns ip automatically
> Recipient of the message: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
> <[EMAI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> containing prohibited content (SYM:23953231121286250666)
>
>
> Subject of the message: RE: getting dns ip automatically
> Recipient of the message: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You've got to be kidding!!! I have received the above notice for each post I
I'll have to have a look at the source
for grins. :)
> and has it been scrutinized for security/privacy holes?
>
> Probably but we don't know to what detail by people outside of Red Hat.
> By the same token, you don't know what level of scrutiny has been
> performed on t
ams
$ rpm -qi up2date
This will tell you that up2date is licensed under the GPL. Feel free to
request the source. I expect it to be on your sources CD or you can use
up2date to pull the src rpm down.
>and has it been scrutinized for security/privacy holes?
Probably but we don't kn
e available for these tools, and has it been
scrutinized for any privacy or security issues? Or is this something
proprietary to RH?
If it's an issue, I will start recommending some other avenue to clients
who are worried about it. If not, I'd like to be able to assure them
that it
grams and has it been scrutinized for security/privacy holes? A lot
> of clients and friends are worried about M$'s ability to spy on them
> and/or the government's ability to force M$ to use their spy technology
> to snoop on people's personal or corporate computers. Is thi
event Microsoft-like domination of the Linux desktop? For
example (I haven't yet perused any of the source code since obtaining
RH), is the source included for the alert notification and up2date
programs and has it been scrutinized for security/privacy holes? A lot
of clients and friends are wor
"Benjamin J. Weiss" a écrit :
>
> > I need to open the 8901, 4446 and ports for my installation. I
> > cannot find anything about this on the Red Hat documentation pages
>
> You need to adjust the rules for your iptables. There's a gui way (the
> command for which I can't remember, since
> I need to open the 8901, 4446 and ports for my installation. I
> cannot find anything about this on the Red Hat documentation pages
You need to adjust the rules for your iptables. There's a gui way (the
command for which I can't remember, since I never use it) and a text
way. You can, as
With lots and lots of ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIC help from Webct Support, I
have finally succeeded in installing Webct on a Test server using Linux 9.0.
Now I find that Linux 9.0's Security configuration is set for high and
only for SSH and HTTP. The interface allows me to select certain
func
From: Brent Herring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Changing the security level configuration to allow port 53
(DNS)
Ok. It's kinda big. You're right. It's not listening which seems to be
my problem. named is not
me the full netstat
-an
-Original Message-
From: Brent Herring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Changing the security level configuration to allow port
53
(DNS)
I forgot to mention that I'm using TinyDNS. All appears to
I still didn't see it listening on any port. Show me the full netstat -an
-Original Message-
From: Brent Herring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Changing the security level configuration to allow port 53
(DNS
rver configured to be a zone slave?
-Original Message-
From: Brent Herring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Changing the security level configuration to allow port 53
(DNS)
I need assistance in allowing my Redhat 9.0 se
the security
level configuration to allow port 53 (DNS)
I need assistance in allowing my Redhat 9.0 server to allow DNS traffic on
port 53.
I have RedHat 9.0 installed and everything is fine except I can't seem to
change the security level configuration to allow traffic on port 53.
I need assistance in allowing my Redhat 9.0 server to allow DNS traffic on
port 53.
I have RedHat 9.0 installed and everything is fine except I can't seem to
change the security level configuration to allow traffic on port 53. Other
services (httpd(80), ssh(22), etc.,) are worki
Lorenzo Prince wrote:
> I am running Postfix on RH9 and may be having a couple of
> problems. I am basically using the out-of-the-box config
> file, except I modified the inet_interfaces option to include
> $myhostname so I can receive messages at my domain and
> localhost so I can send messages u
On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 22:22, Lorenzo Prince wrote:
> Then I ran across another problem just a few days ago. Seems I sent a message that
> I really didn't
> send to an email address that I had never heard of. I received an email messge
> warning me that the message I sent
> (which I didn't act
I am running Postfix on RH9 and may be having a couple of problems. I am basically
using the out-of-the-box config
file, except I modified the inet_interfaces option to include $myhostname so I can
receive messages at my domain and
localhost so I can send messages using my favorite mailers. O
If you screwed up the shell, specify it manually:
su -l -s /bin/bash
should force a bash shell.
--
Sen. Orrin Hatch thinks destroying private property to ensure bigger
campaign contributions from media cartels is "good politics." Let your
senators know that supporting corporate vigilant
o to that it'll work appropriately and then modify the root
security access. Thank for your support.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Thomas E. Dukes
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: HELP! - I&
9:28
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: HELP! - I've
screwed up on security and now can't access root
I consider myself an intermediate user on Linux. I can
do things very well,others not well at all. At my workplace, I've
converted a former PIII NTmachine into
e SSH enabled to
transfer and store critical files. Although it was my first time doing so, I
was able to impliment SSH, and then started looking for addtional security.
So I downloaded the RH Linux Security Guide from RH's site.
I was walking through the guide, and started working on root access
Hello List,
I am maintaing a mailing list using smartlist. The
list is running on linux 9.0 using sendmail and
procmail. Recently the mailing list is getting spam
and the headers of the mails show:
Received: from
(localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
(8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
h5MFH5cP00895
Hi,
I have found some useful files in /etc/security. I have changed them
to suit my needs. But I am sure that they are not working. Do i need to
change anything else to make all the limits works and do you know any
where that will give some detail explaination to them
The server is redhat 7.3
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 23:42, tirumal b wrote:
> hello
>
>I have installed redhat linux 8.0(Psyche).During
> the installation i set no firewall but when i see it
> in the security level after installation the level is
> high by default. I change my option to medium and
&g
hello
I have installed redhat linux 8.0(Psyche).During
the installation i set no firewall but when i see it
in the security level after installation the level is
high by default. I change my option to medium and
selected customize option and selected some of the
services to be allowed.I
Hi,
I recently setup a new machine with RH 8 and I've been experiencing
weird problems with an application we are currently developing since
I've installed a security patch to the glibc package.
For your information, RH 8 ships we glibc-2.2.93-5. upgrading glibc to
package 2.3.2 wil
t; I guess this is asked a lot. If so, could anyone
point me to any
relevant
> resources?
>
> Thanks
> Ben
Ben -
Security is a big topic, and here are a few websites
that I try to hit on a daily basis to learn more:
http://linuxsecurity.com/
http://packetstorm.linuxsecurit
First of all, disable all the start-up services that you don't need by using setup
command. Install chkrootkit and tripwire program to detect if your machine has been
compromised or not?
Nabin Limbu
On 30 May 2003 at 18:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a bit of a linux newbie. Out
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 12:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a bit of a linux newbie. Out of the box, what should be the first things I
> do/learn/disable to secure my box? Is there anything I could run or look out
> for to indicate a hack of any kind?
>
> I guess this is asked a lot.
What purpose would your Linux box serve? With the later versions, RH
provides some decent security with the firewall and ssh being the only
service turned on by default.
One thing I always add is some protection against people getting root
locally by rebooting to single-user mode. If you use
Hi Ben,
The most important thing is to not hook your box up to the internet (except through a
well-configured firewall) until you are confident with the security! Use a disk or CD
to transfer RPMs to the box.
I find the default configuration for RH9 is pretty good, but definitely needs some
Hi,
I'm a bit of a linux newbie. Out of the box, what should be the first things I
do/learn/disable to secure my box? Is there anything I could run or look out
for to indicate a hack of any kind?
I guess this is asked a lot. If so, could anyone point me to any relevant
resources?
Thanks
B
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> Clients don't change the server config...
I was pretty sure this was the case.
> Perhaps you had not restarted
> the sshd after making the config changes? Try to reproduce the problem
> and report it if you can. If not, then you probably didn'
Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
I'm running openssh-3.1p1-6 on RedHat 7.2. I have the following
options in my sshd_config:
...
# To disable tunneled clear text passwords, change to no here!
PasswordAuthentication no
PermitEmptyPasswords no
So, as configured, I should only be allowed to login in if I have
a p
I'm running openssh-3.1p1-6 on RedHat 7.2. I have the following
options in my sshd_config:
RhostsAuthentication no
#
# For this to work you will also need host keys in /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts
RhostsRSAAuthentication no
# similar for protocol version 2
HostbasedAuthentication no
#
RSAAuthenticati
Something else to look at...what is in /etc/hosts.allow and
/etc/hosts.deny . I had to add sendmail:ALL in my /etc/hosts.allow file
for mail to work.
Mark
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Deleo Paulo Ribeiro Junior wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am using firewall with the option "high" selected. Despite of especif
ntcap name = /etc/printcap
max log size = 0
hosts allow = 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 127.0.0.1
writable = yes
obey pam restrictions = yes
passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n
*passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
Deleo Paulo Ribeiro Junior wrote:
Hello!
I am using firewall with the option "high" selected. Despite of
especifying that ports 25 and 110 are allowed to be used (tcp and upd)
the sendmail servide does not work.
Anyone knows what is the problem?
[...]
can you post your ipchains or iptables
aa, sendmail defualts to only listen on the local (127.0.0.1) IP.
Check your sendmail.mc
> Deleo Paulo Ribeiro Junior wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I am using firewall with the option "high" selected. Despite of
> especifying that ports 25 and 110 are allowed to be used (tcp and upd)
> the sendmail
t is the problem?
>
> Thank you
IIRC, with lokkit (AKA redhat-config-securitylevel), if the setting is
"high" almost all ports are blocked, even if you attempt to customize.
If you want to open ports for anything, start by choosing security level
"medium", then choose &q
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003
1:40 PM
To: Lista RedHat
Subject: Security High
Hello!
I am using firewall with the option
"high" selected. Despite of especifying that ports 25 and 110 are
allowed to be used (tcp and upd) the sendmail servid
Do you have nmap? Get it and nmap your 127.0.0.1 address and then your
regular IP address. If 25 is only open on 127 then you need to setup
sendmail to listen on the external address. If won't by default. Check
your /etc/mail/sendmail.mc file and edit it. Then use m4 to gen a new cf
file.
<>
On F
On February 28, 2003 01:39 pm, Deleo Paulo Ribeiro Junior wrote:
> I am using firewall with the option "high" selected. Despite of especifying
> that ports 25 and 110 are allowed to be used (tcp and upd) the sendmail
> servide does not work.
first, you have to find out if the service is even runni
Hello!
I am using firewall with the option "high"
selected. Despite of especifying that ports 25 and 110 are allowed to be used
(tcp and upd) the sendmail servide does not work.
Anyone knows what is the problem?
Thank you
Eng. Deleo Paulo Ribeiro Junior55 48
231-163755 48 233-0081[EMA
everal
times, actually, since I'm on several security-related lists).
All the errata seem to be sent to redhat-watch and redhat-announce.
Which one did you miss?
Emmanuel
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
om/errata/rh8-errata-security.html. I just wondered
| > if there's a way to have security alerts delivered to my inbox where I'm
| > more likely to notice them quickly.
|
| Red Hat has a redhat-watch list for errata-only news.
| redhat-announce is also very low traffic (errata + release an
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:23:22AM -0500, Kevin Krumwiede wrote:
>
> If there's a remote vulnerability in some RedHat package, will it be
> posted to this list? I know about
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh8-errata-security.html. I just wondered
> if there's a wa
A good solution might be to have a look at various security-lists. I
get about 4 or 5 different security-lists (also including Debian-
security - since most bugs are general-linux). If your looking for
redhat-specific messages RHN is your first choice - but if your also
using packets / programs
If there's a remote vulnerability in some RedHat package, will it be
posted to this list? I know about
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh8-errata-security.html. I just wondered
if there's a way to have security alerts delivered to my inbox where I'm
more likely to notice them
rote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to change the security level from High to Medium. But,
> even though I'm logged in as root when I open up the tool to see if my
> changes are there it always shows the Level as High.
>
> Does anyone know how to allow changes to the securi
rote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to change the security level from High to Medium. But,
> even though I'm logged in as root when I open up the tool to see if my
> changes are there it always shows the Level as High.
>
> Does anyone know how to allow changes to the securi
that config tool can't read the settings u have made before. u need to
check /etc/sysconfig/iptables or ipchains to verify the settings.
Also, u can use:
iptables -L
ipchains -L
cheers.
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 06:39, Joel Lopez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to change
Joel Lopez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to change the security level from High to Medium. But,
> even though I'm logged in as root when I open up the tool to see if my
> changes are there it always shows the Level as High.
If your using ipchains or Linux 7
> I've been trying to change the security level from High to Medium. But,
> even though I'm logged in as root when I open up the tool to see if my
> changes are there it always shows the Level as High.
>
> Does anyone know how to allow changes to the security level?
>
Yes. This is normal. The security tool resets itself to high by default when
it initializes. It does not seem to read the existing state of the system.
It just goes there.
It is registering your changes and applying them.
It would probably in the long run serve you better to take over the fire
Hi,
I've been trying to change the security level from High to Medium. But,
even though I'm logged in as root when I open up the tool to see if my
changes are there it always shows the Level as High.
Does anyone know how to allow changes to the security level?
thanks,
Joel
--
r
1 - 100 of 600 matches
Mail list logo
