> > user-space tools are thos of 2004.08.09-internal.testing?
> >
> ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4progs
Do they include the libaal.patch and the reiser4progs-1.0.0-tree_scan.patch?
Hello
Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 06:23:45PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hello
hi
Namesys has issued new reiser4 snapshot
(http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.13.04).
It is against 2.6.8-rc4-mm1.
user-space tools are thos of 2004.08.09-internal.testing
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 06:23:45PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
> Hello
hi
> Namesys has issued new reiser4 snapshot
> (http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.13.04).
> It is against 2.6.8-rc4-mm1.
user-space tools are thos of 2004.08.09-internal.testing?
-[ Domenico A
Hello
Namesys has issued new reiser4 snapshot
(http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.13.04).
It is against 2.6.8-rc4-mm1.
Most of changes address warnings Andrew Morton made about patches for kernel reiser4
depends on.
Look at http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.13.04/READ.ME for install
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 10:28:14PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
>
>Namesys has issued new reiser4 snapshot
HOORAY!
This is the best news in a while :)
When will we see a directory listing by Apache2?-)
And the somewhat gloomy question:
What's the status on Faye's a
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 12:28, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
> Hello
>
> Namesys has issued new reiser4 snapshot
> (http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.04).
> It is against 2.6.8-rc2-mm2.
> It is mostly bug fixes.
> Look at http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.0
Hello
Namesys has issued new reiser4 snapshot
(http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.04).
It is against 2.6.8-rc2-mm2.
It is mostly bug fixes.
Look at http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.08.04/READ.ME for install instructions
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 05:22:29PM -0500, David Dabbs wrote:
>
>Con Kolivas is the cko maintainer:
I'll speak for Mr. Neuman here, he is the -cko maintainer, as
Con is the -ck maintainer.
--
mjt
My apologies, Con Kolivass page is at:
http://members.optusnet.com.au/ckolivas/kernel/
David
Con Kolivas is the cko maintainer:
http://kem.p.lodz.pl/~peter/cko/
David
Piotr Neuman wrote:
Hi, I took reiser4-2004.06.16-19.36-linux-2.6.7-rc3-mm1.diff.gz from
http://namesys.com/auto-snapshots/ and it appeared to apply pretty well on
vanilla 2.6.7 kernel. So I made patches for vanilla and -cko available in:
http://kem.p.lodz.pl/~peter/cko/reiser4/
Hope those patch
Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
Le Fri, Mar 26, 2004, Ã 09:11:00AM -0800, Hans Reiser a écrit:
Nikita, would you confirm that the default fibration is to sort all
files with '.' as the penultimate character by their last character
first and then by the rest of the name in the usual lexicographic or
Jonathan Briggs wrote:
This command:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=4k count=256k
seems to take longer than it did before. The difference seems to be all
system time.
I will have to reboot to an old version later, to get accurate numbers.
I don't have debugging turned on, so that's not it. Ha
This command:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=4k count=256k
seems to take longer than it did before. The difference seems to be all
system time.
I will have to reboot to an old version later, to get accurate numbers.
I don't have debugging turned on, so that's not it. Has something
changed tha
Nikita, would you confirm that the default fibration is to sort all
files with '.' as the penultimate character by their last character
first and then by the rest of the name in the usual lexicographic order?
(If that is not the default, then please make it the default.)
Also, please note that
Jonathan Briggs writes:
> On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 09:45, Nikita Danilov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > new reiser4 snapshot against 2.6.5-rc2 is available at
> >
> > http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.03.26/
> >
> > It is mainly bug-fixing r
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 09:45, Nikita Danilov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> new reiser4 snapshot against 2.6.5-rc2 is available at
>
> http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.03.26/
>
> It is mainly bug-fixing release. See READ.ME for the list of fixes and
> caveats.
A defin
Hello,
new reiser4 snapshot against 2.6.5-rc2 is available at
http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.03.26/
It is mainly bug-fixing release. See READ.ME for the list of fixes and
caveats.
Should no significant problems be found in this snapshot, we shall start
sending patches to -mm next week
Hello
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 04:18, Henning Westerholt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i tried the latest snapshot one more time with some debug options activated.
> Now the compiling of eg. xfree produces no errors on the filesystem. But
> after the compiling, i unmounted the fs, and got a error message in
Am Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2004 00:40 schrieben Sie:
> Have you tried re-compiling a kernel yet? That usually flushes out disk
> problems caused by marginal or poorly seating memory modules.
>
> jim burnes
> security engineer
> great-west, denver
My system runs normally very stable, last weekend
Hello,
i tried the latest snapshot one more time with some debug options activated.
Now the compiling of eg. xfree produces no errors on the filesystem. But
after the compiling, i unmounted the fs, and got a error message in the
syslog:
kernel: reiser4[umount(8437)]: reiser4_kill_super (fs/rei
Hello,
new reiser4 snapshot against 2.6.3 kernel is available at
http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.02.25
It contains bug fixes and stability improvements. On-disk format is
compatible with the previous snapshot. Also,
* raid0 preliminary support, and
* improved loop back support
were
Nikita Danilov wrote (ao):
> Sander writes:
> > Btw, can you please make a snapshot against the -mm tree? I think
> > that would help to get it included in that tree.
>
> Well, making two snapshots is kind of "double trouble", because both
> has to be tested and bug reports for them have to be h
Sander writes:
> Hi Nikita,
>
> Nikita Danilov wrote (ao):
> > new snapshot has been released. It is mainly bug-fixing release.
> >
> > Take a look at the READ.ME for the list of known problems.
>
> There are two LATEST_IS files in the snapshots dir.
Thanks, fixed.
>
> Btw, can you
Hi Nikita,
Nikita Danilov wrote (ao):
> new snapshot has been released. It is mainly bug-fixing release.
>
> Take a look at the READ.ME for the list of known problems.
There are two LATEST_IS files in the snapshots dir.
Btw, can you please make a snapshot against the -mm tree? I think that
woul
Hello,
new snapshot has been released. It is mainly bug-fixing release.
Take a look at the READ.ME for the list of known problems.
Nikita.
Viktors Rotanovs writes:
> Nikita Danilov wrote:
>
> > > Also, does lack of sendfile in the current snapshot mean that Apache
> > > will lose in performance when serving from Reiser4 partition?
> >
> > Hmm, what Apache uses sendfile for?
>
>
> It uses it to send static content to clien
Nikita Danilov wrote:
> Also, does lack of sendfile in the current snapshot mean that Apache
> will lose in performance when serving from Reiser4 partition?
Hmm, what Apache uses sendfile for?
It uses it to send static content to client. Quote from Apache 2 docs:
"In situations where Apache 2
Viktors Rotanovs writes:
> Nikita Danilov wrote:
>
> >new reiser4 snapshot (for 2.6.0) is available at the
> >http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.12.23/
> >See READ.ME file there for more instructions.
> >
> >
> What areas are still not ready f
Nikita Danilov wrote:
new reiser4 snapshot (for 2.6.0) is available at the
http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.12.23/
See READ.ME file there for more instructions.
What areas are still not ready for production?
How risky it would be to put, say, 2 e-mail users (cyrus imap and
nothing
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger writes:
> Nikita Danilov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > new reiser4 snapshot (for 2.6.0) is available at the
> >
> > http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.12.23/
> > [...]
> > broken-out core.diff split into
Nikita Danilov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> new reiser4 snapshot (for 2.6.0) is available at the
>
> http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.12.23/
> [...]
> broken-out core.diff split into separate patches
403 Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /snaps
Hello,
new reiser4 snapshot (for 2.6.0) is available at the
http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.12.23/
See READ.ME file there for more instructions.
WARNING: WARNING: WARNING: WARNING: WARNING: WARNING: WARNING
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:27:29PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
> > I made a cleanup for reiser4 patches (by removing UML-specific changes),
> > you can see result here:
> >
> > http://namesys.com/snapshots/2003.11.17/cleaned-up/
>
> That directory doesn't exis
Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
> I made a cleanup for reiser4 patches (by removing UML-specific changes),
> you can see result here:
>
> http://namesys.com/snapshots/2003.11.17/cleaned-up/
That directory doesn't exist.
Carl-Daniel
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:20:28PM +0300, Alex Zarochentcev wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 12:04:25PM +0100, Gianni Tedesco wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 10:42, Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
> > > > fetch it
> > > > http://namesys.com/snapshots/2003.11.12/linux-2.6.0-test9-reiser4.diff.gz
> >
> >
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 12:04:25PM +0100, Gianni Tedesco wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 10:42, Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
> > > fetch it
> > > http://namesys.com/snapshots/2003.11.12/linux-2.6.0-test9-reiser4.diff.gz
>
> Seems to be combined with the UML patch...
>
> zcat linux-2.6.0-test9-reiser4.
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 10:42, Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
> > fetch it
> > http://namesys.com/snapshots/2003.11.12/linux-2.6.0-test9-reiser4.diff.gz
Seems to be combined with the UML patch...
zcat linux-2.6.0-test9-reiser4.diff.gz | diffstat
Makefile
[resend to LKML]
> Hi All,
>
> New snapshot arrived
>
> fetch it
> http://namesys.com/snapshots/2003.11.12/linux-2.6.0-test9-reiser4.diff.gz
>
> for description look at http://namesys.com/snapshots/2003.11.12/READ.ME
>
> reiser4progs and libaal packages should be taken from the previous snapsh
Hi All,
New snapshot arrived
fetch it
http://namesys.com/snapshots/2003.11.12/linux-2.6.0-test9-reiser4.diff.gz
for description look at http://namesys.com/snapshots/2003.11.12/READ.ME
reiser4progs and libaal packages should be taken from the previous snapshot
dir http://namesys.com/snapshot/200
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:44:22PM +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote:
> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger writes:
> > I thought CONFIG_REISER4_LARGE_KEY was force-enabled by now?
>
> No. But:
>
> 1. one has to use -o key=key_short option for mkfs.reiser4 to create
> file system with small keys.
>
> 2. lately we
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 07:59:51AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> p.s. FYI, the clinical definition of insanity is "the fixation that
> doing the same thing repeatedly will somehow produce different results."
Heh, there are many things where doing the same thing repeatedly will
produce differen
Hi,
I hope this patch for configure.in will solve the problem.
Try it please and tell us about your results.
On Saturday 13 September 2003 23:21, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 06:05:58PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> > >>my system definitely has readline installed, and i
Hello!
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 10:41:47AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > did you adjust our headers to be redhat compatible? If not, please do.
> i didn't see anything in the READ.ME about adjusting headers, but would
> this also explain why, if i build reiser 4 support directly into the
> k
Hello!
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 06:05:58PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> >>my system definitely has readline installed, and i get the same error.
> >On the other hand, you need not only readline itself, but also its header
> >files.
> >Lots of distributions (e.g. redhat-alike) form another package c
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Hans Reiser wrote:
> did you adjust our headers to be redhat compatible? If not, please do.
i didn't see anything in the READ.ME about adjusting headers, but would
this also explain why, if i build reiser 4 support directly into the
kernel, my "make modules_install" works f
Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 04:38:01AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
It is because of paranoid -Werror flag.
./configure --disable-werror will help you.
However, if your system will have readline (as on systems which are used by
reiser4progs developers :-) headers tha
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 13:59, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > If my memory serves me well, that's the only patch needed to make it
> > compile.
>
> i'm confused. the "patch" i refer to is the kernel patch to build
> reiser 4 support into the kernel. the fact that this works on
> patching the kernel
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 13:27, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> >
> > > I've downloaded libaal and reiser4progs as noted above. I applied the
> > > whole reiser4.diff to 2.6.0-test5-bk3, but, when I run
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 13:27, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
>
> > I've downloaded libaal and reiser4progs as noted above. I applied the
> > whole reiser4.diff to 2.6.0-test5-bk3, but, when I run:
> >
> > # mkfs.reiser4 /dev/hda4
> > # mount -t reiser4 /
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> I've downloaded libaal and reiser4progs as noted above. I applied the
> whole reiser4.diff to 2.6.0-test5-bk3, but, when I run:
>
> # mkfs.reiser4 /dev/hda4
> # mount -t reiser4 /dev/hda4 /mnt
>
> I get the following oops:
(snip)
not to beat t
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 18:15, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Another reiser4 snapshot was released today. This time it is against
>2.6.0-test5.
>Please take note that DISK DORMAT IS CHANGED, so you need to recreate
>your reiser4 filesystems (if you have any). Thi
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 04:38:01AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > > It is because of paranoid -Werror flag.
> > > ./configure --disable-werror will help you.
> > > However, if your system will have readline (as on systems which are use
Hello!
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 04:38:01AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > It is because of paranoid -Werror flag.
> > ./configure --disable-werror will help you.
> > However, if your system will have readline (as on systems which are used by
> > reiser4progs developers :-) headers that warni
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 01:20:59PM -0700, Mike Benoit wrote:
> > Any ideas why I would get this error while trying to compile
> > reiser4progs-0.4.14? The previous version of reiser4progs seemed to
> > compile fine for me, as did compiling reiser4 in
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 01:20:59PM -0700, Mike Benoit wrote:
> Any ideas why I would get this error while trying to compile
> reiser4progs-0.4.14? The previous version of reiser4progs seemed to
> compile fine for me, as did compiling reiser4 in to the test5 kernel.
>
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/ipso/downloads/reiser4progs-0.4.14/libmisc'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ipso/downloads/reiser4progs-0.4.14'
make: *** [all] Error 2
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 09:15, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
&g
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 01:14:46PM -0600, Steven Cole wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 12:41, Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:41:45PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> > > Mr. Demidov, if you put code that does not compile into our tree you
> > > need to make the config option for
Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 08:03, Yury Umanets wrote:
Information: Reiser4 is going to be created on /dev/sda5.
(Yes/No): Yes
Creating reiser4 on /dev/sda5...
mkfs.reiser4(5676): unaligned access to 0x600242f2, ip=0x200f7661
mkfs.reiser4(5676): unaligned a
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 08:03, Yury Umanets wrote:
> >
> > Information: Reiser4 is going to be created on /dev/sda5.
> > (Yes/No): Yes
> > Creating reiser4 on /dev/sda5...
> > mkfs.reiser4(5676): unaligned access to 0x600242f2, ip=0x200f7661
> > mkfs.reiser4(5676): unaligned access
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 11:28:44PM +0200, Diego Calleja Garc?a wrote:
> btw, I suppose this feature will be removed if/when reiser4 is merged?:
> config REISER4_FS_SYSCALL
> bool "Enable reiser4 system call"
No. It will be fixed.
> dmesg errors:
> (fs/ext3/inode.c, 2728): ext3_wr
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 09:52, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 02:22:33PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> > Fixed some bugs. And finally reiser4 should compile on 64bit boxes
> > (hm. somebody try it, as I am unable to build any 2.6 kernel for
> > ia64).
>
> I built this with IA64 2.6.0-tes
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 02:22:33PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Fixed some bugs. And finally reiser4 should compile on 64bit boxes
> (hm. somebody try it, as I am unable to build any 2.6 kernel for
> ia64).
I built this with IA64 2.6.0-test4, it works but there were lots of
warnings (I can put up a
Okay I have had the Reiser4 snapshot managing my /home for a good few
hours and while the patch itself was... very experimental... I'm
completely blown away but the exellent speed Reiser4 provides me for
usertasks.
Here's my favorite show off so far:
patch your gtk+-2.2.2 with t
Hello!
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 06:16:35PM -0700, Tupshin Harper wrote:
> Are these patches available outside of bitkeeper, and if so, where are
> they located?
Yes, they are at http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.08.22 , as somebody
pointed out already.
I just forgot to mention the URL.
B
I'd like to second that, patches against -mm would be a very good option.
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 02:25:59 +0200, Vince wrote:
(...)
>
> Sidenote to reiserfs devels : if the merge in mainstream is still far
> away, is any integration of reiser4 into the -mm serie considered ? It
> would ease testing
Tupshin Harper wrote:
Are these patches available outside of bitkeeper, and if so, where are
they located?
http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/
:j
David Nielsen wrote:
The entire thing then fails with these messages - no notable compile
errors or warnings present.
fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9a8cd): In function `print_context':
: undefined reference to `info_atom'
fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9e392): In function `commit_current_atom':
: undefined refer
Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
I have just released new snapshot of reiser4.
Release notes follows.
Give it a try.
Reiser4 snapshot for 2003.08.22
WARNING!!! This code is experimental! WE ARE NOT KIDDING! DO NOT PUT
ANY VALUABLE DATA ON REISER4 YET!
Fixed builds for 64bit arches (there are
Could I ask you guys to stop CCing me, I'm on the list - filling my
inbox with dupes is cruel :)
- David
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 02:25, Vince wrote:
> I worked around this by adding an empty info_atom in reiser4/txnmgr.c :
>
> void
> info_atom(const char *prefix, txn_atom * atom)
> {
> re
I worked around this by adding an empty info_atom in reiser4/txnmgr.c :
void
info_atom(const char *prefix, txn_atom * atom)
{
return;
}
After that, reiser4 compiles and is running without problem here so
far (just tried a few minutes of fsx-linux and a few small compilations.
I'll launc
Am Sa, 2003-08-23 um 01.47 schrieb David Nielsen:
> The entire thing then fails with these messages - no notable compile
> errors or warnings present.
>
> fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9a8cd): In function `print_context':
> : undefined reference to `info_atom'
> fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9e392): In function
The entire thing then fails with these messages - no notable compile
errors or warnings present.
fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9a8cd): In function `print_context':
: undefined reference to `info_atom'
fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9e392): In function `commit_current_atom':
: undefined reference to `info_atom'
fs
David Nielsen writes:
> Not enough to just enable printing - and your code throws so many
> warnings it's close to being scary (truely alpha... I love it)
This is for really adventurous. :)
>
> I think the hack around would be to disable syscall support if I'm
> correct?
yes.
>
> fs/re
Not enough to just enable printing - and your code throws so many
warnings it's close to being scary (truely alpha... I love it)
I think the hack around would be to disable syscall support if I'm
correct?
fs/reiser4/sys_reiser4.c:54:32: parser/parser.code.c: No such file or
directory
fs/reiser4/s
David Nielsen writes:
> This needs to be fixed - it doesn't compile
Oops. As a work around, please, turn on REISER4_DEBUG_OUTPUT ("Printing"
in reiser4 debug option sub menu).
>
> GCC version is 3.3.1
>
Nikita.
> CC fs/reiser4/txnmgr.o
fined
make[2]: *** [fs/reiser4/txnmgr.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/reiser4] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 17:08, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
>I have just released new snapshot of reiser4.
>Release notes follows.
>Give it a try.
>
> Reiser4
Le Tue, Aug 12, 2003, à 12:25:58PM +0400, Yury Umanets a écrit:
> Everything is fixed and new snapshot is in
> http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.08.11/.
>
> See ./configure --help for new option --with-libaal.
That fixes it, thanks!
It can be debated whether --with-libaal=/foo/bar shoul
> Another little glitch is that the configure.in explicitly checks for 0.4.8
> while the provided libaal is 0.4.9. No biggie, just requires modifying the
> configure.in and re-running autoconf (you might want to add a check against
> that condition in your pre-upload QA scripts).
yes, thanks, I ha
Le Tue, Aug 12, 2003, à 01:54:28PM +0400, Yury Umanets a écrit:
> > It can be debated whether --with-libaal=/foo/bar should imply
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/foo/bar/lib or not (it doesn't seem it
> I guess, it is not the job for configure script, but rather for
> user/administrator. At
Hello!
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 05:32:25PM -0700, Boris Tschirschwitz wrote:
> I thought I'd give it a try on 2.6.0-test3-mm1.
> Even with 'make mrproper' before compiling, I get the following error
> message:
> (Is there any interest in such error reports?)
Yes, there is.
> bobele linux # make
Am Dienstag, 12. August 2003 10:56 schrieb Nikita Danilov
> > [know issues]
> > 3)
> > I'm also unable to build reiser4 as module:
> > [...]
> > include/linux/irq.h:69: warning: size of `irq_desc' is 28672 bytes
> > LD [M] fs/reiser4/reiser4.o
> > LD fs/built-in.o
> > GEN .v
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 11:22, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Le Tue, Aug 12, 2003, à 10:05:42AM +0400, Oleg Drokin a écrit:
> > Hello!
> >
Hello,
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 05:32:25PM -0700, Boris Tschirschwitz wrote:
> >
> > > I thought I'd give it a try on 2.6.0-test3-mm1.
> > > Even with 'make mrpr
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 13:48, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Le Tue, Aug 12, 2003, à 12:25:58PM +0400, Yury Umanets a écrit:
>
> > Everything is fixed and new snapshot is in
> > http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.08.11/.
> >
> > See ./configure --help for new option --with-libaal.
>
> That fixes
Le Tue, Aug 12, 2003, à 11:31:57AM +0400, Yury Umanets a écrit:
> > I have a problem: reiserfs4progs doesn't seem to pay attention to the
> > --prefix when it comes to locating libaal.
>
> --prefix is not the prefix libraries are looked at. It is the prefix of
> where package libraries and inclu
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 12:02, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Le Tue, Aug 12, 2003, à 11:31:57AM +0400, Yury Umanets a écrit:
>
> > > I have a problem: reiserfs4progs doesn't seem to pay attention to the
> > > --prefix when it comes to locating libaal.
> >
> > --prefix is not the prefix libraries are lo
Nikita Danilov wrote (ao):
> new reiser4 snapshot is available at:
>
> http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.02.13/
Thanks a lot for this snapshot, and for reiserfs in general.
> Your feedback and testing efforts are most valuable to us.
>
Hello,
new reiser4 snapshot is available at:
http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.02.13/
Your feedback and testing efforts are most valuable to us.
>From README:
--
Reiser4 snapshot for 2003.02.13
WARNING!!! This code
Oleg Drokin wrote (ao):
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 01:09:20PM +0100, Ookhoi wrote:
> > > It is released as a patch against linux-2.5.58 kernel. It should also
> > > work with current (January 16th) bk snapshot at
> > > http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5
> > > This is mostly bug fixing release.
> > >
Hello!
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 01:09:20PM +0100, Ookhoi wrote:
> > It is released as a patch against linux-2.5.58 kernel. It should also
> > work with current (January 16th) bk snapshot at
> > http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5
> > This is mostly bug fixing release.
> > READ.ME file contains change
Ookhoi wrote (ao):
# Nikita Danilov wrote (ao):
# > new reiser4 snapshot is available at:
# >
# > http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.01.16/
#
# Thanks :-)
#
# > It is released as a patch against linux-2.5.58 kernel. It should also
# > work with current (January 16th) bk snaps
Nikita Danilov wrote (ao):
> new reiser4 snapshot is available at:
>
> http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.01.16/
Thanks :-)
> It is released as a patch against linux-2.5.58 kernel. It should also
> work with current (January 16th) bk snapshot at
> http://linux.bkbits.net/l
Hello,
new reiser4 snapshot is available at:
http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.01.16/
It is released as a patch against linux-2.5.58 kernel. It should also
work with current (January 16th) bk snapshot at
http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5
This is mostly bug fixing release.
READ.ME file
Nikita Danilov wrote (ao):
> new reiser4 snapshot is available at:
>
> http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2002.12.24/
>
> It is released as a patch against linux-2.5.53 kernel. It should also
> work with current (December 24th) bk snapshot at
> http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.
94 matches
Mail list logo
