Re: Religion-only accommodation question

2005-04-08 Thread Hamilton02
Labeling religions "majoritarian" and "minority" is both bootstrapping and inaccurate.  There is no majority religion in the United States.  For your purposes, I would think the better classification would be politically powerful and politically powerless.   Religions have been responsible fo

Re: Religion-only accommodation question

2005-04-08 Thread Steven Jamar
On Friday, April 8, 2005, at 11:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Labeling religions "majoritarian" and "minority" is both bootstrapping and inaccurate.  There is no majority religion in the United States.  I guess, then, that Christianity does not constitute a religion. I assume what was meant

Re: Religion-only accommodation question

2005-04-08 Thread Hamilton02
Thanks, Steve.  That is a helpful elaboration.  There is no single Christian religion, but rather hundreds, if not thousands, of denominations.  It is a category without meaning especially in the U.S., which was settled and founded by Christian denominations that held radically different bel

RE: Religion-only accommodation question

2005-04-08 Thread Lund, Christopher
    I don't know much about this and want to learn more.  Are religious institutions really able to use judicial or legislative exemptions to defend themselves against crimes of physical or sexual abuse?  It seemed to me that virtually any harm to others was enough to get your judi

Re: Religion-only accommodation question

2005-04-08 Thread RJLipkin
There's an important distinction between claiming that there is no single Christian religion, on the one hand, and that Christianity "is a category without meaning"  on the other. The distinction clearly arises, I think, by asking two questions. First, to whom is the category meaning

Auto Response from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-04-08 Thread samulond
I will be out of the office Friday, April 8 - Monday, April 11, and unable to access email regularly while I am away. If you need assistance prior to my return, please contact my colleague Jeff Zack at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or (212) 891-6742. Otherwise, I look forward to reading your email upon

Re: Religion-only accommodation question

2005-04-08 Thread Samuel V
So far as I know, there is no authority for a religion-based defense to a claim of "sexual abuse." The cases are split, however, as to whether there is a First Amendment defense to a claim of "negligent hiring," "negligent retention," or "negligent ordination," which claims seek to impose liabilty

Re: Religion-only accommodation question

2005-04-08 Thread Hamilton02
There are too many to name here, but faith-healing exemptions exist for both criminal and civil liability in many states.  An article published a few years ago documented over 200 preventable deaths of children due to faith-healing.   Churches facing clergy abuse lawsuits (the Rom

Re: Religion-only accommodation question

2005-04-08 Thread Steven Jamar
>From some perspectives, the only meaningful difference among Judaism, Christianity, and Islam is when they stopped accepting new prophets-- Christianity with Jesus, Islam with Mohammed, Judaism (not stopped yet). All look to Moses, all claim a belief in one god, all started in the same part of th

church liability for harm and the First Amendment

2005-04-08 Thread Hamilton02
  Some of the cases do indeed ask the question whether a church is liable for covering up pedophile behavior among its clergy (though that is only one part of the sex abuse and churches category).  Courts have rejected clergy malpractice claims on the ground that courts have no business deter

Re: Religion-only accommodation question

2005-04-08 Thread Hamilton02
  Bobby-- You are right.  That is what I meant, and while it is a criticism that can be levelled at any term, it is an important criticism in the current climate of the culture wars in the U.S.  A lot of freight has been riding on "Christian," as in this is a "Christian" country.  The term i

Re: church liability for harm and the First Amendment

2005-04-08 Thread Lupu
As a matter of self-promotion (rather than observation or judgment) that I hope may be helpful to others, I remind list members that Bob Tuttle and I have recently published an article entitled "Sexual Misconduct and Ecclesiastical Immunity," 2004 BYU L. Rev 1789 (part of a Symposium on Church

Re: Religion-only accommodation question

2005-04-08 Thread AAsch
I think the more interesting cases are not the ones involving physical and sexual abuse about which I would hope there's some reasonable consensus against religious exemption. The more interesting cases are the ones where the rights are more evenly matched because they ask harder questions about wh

Re: Religion-only accommodation question

2005-04-08 Thread Hamilton02
I wish that were true, among academics, among religious entities, and lawmakers.  But it is not.  The default position for accommodation and free exercise jurisprudence among most academics and religious entities is one that focuses solely on the needs of the religious entities -- which, in

RE: Religion-only accommodation question

2005-04-08 Thread Newsom Michael
1. Collectively evangelical Protestantism is the majority religion in the United States.  My justification for treating pan-Protestantism as a religion is set out in my Protestant Empire piece, and I will not rehearse it here.  The “power” test does not advance the analysis, in my