it is
part of the brand of the city.
Eric
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Brownstein, Alan
[aebrownst...@ucdavis.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 5:06 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law A
December 21, 2010 5:06 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
I agree with Michael for the most part and certainly with his statement that
expressions of religious faith are not analogous to
aw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Masinter
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 1:47 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Alan's examples of uniform language expressing racia
s.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Masinter
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 11:12 AM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
As always, Eugene asks good questions.
Religious discrimination claims can take several forms -- dispa
sinter
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 11:12 AM
> To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
> religioussymbols
>
> As always, Eugene asks good questions.
>
> Religious discrimination claims can take seve
onlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-
> > boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Masinter
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 11:12 AM
> > To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> > Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
> > religi
2010 11:12 AM
> To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
> religioussymbols
>
> As always, Eugene asks good questions.
>
> Religious discrimination claims can take several forms -- disparate
> treatment, failure to accomm
The list could go on.
Eugene
-Original Message-
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-
boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Masinter
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 10:01 AM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank
ionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-
> boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Masinter
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 10:01 AM
> To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
> religioussymbols
>
> I do
5:09 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Alan --
Does your analysis below apply equally to religious organizations
and non-religious organizations?
One example I think would be interesting i
On Behalf Of Brownstein, Alan
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 8:54 AM
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
> religioussymbols
>
> I always assumed, although I admit without much reflection, that the
--
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Rassbach
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 5:09 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Alan --
D
onlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu]
On Behalf Of Brownstein, Alan [aebrownst...@ucdavis.edu]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 2:26 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
I think Doug is correct that there
er 17, 2010 4:36 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take
down religioussymbols
Do you think there is a discrimination issue as well as an
accommodation issue in cases like this, Eugene. Suppose a bank in
a southern st
ionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas Laycock
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 9:52 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics; Eric Rassbach
Subject: Re: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
It doesn't make sense to call religious truth cl
laims are a feature, not a bug, of religious life, so it
>>> doesn't make sense to call one group's truth claims or the symbols
>>> representing those truth claims "offensive" or discriminatory per se.
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
.ucla.edu]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 10:33 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Alan: Can you flesh out the discrimination theory
more? I take it that the claim is
@lists.ucla.edu
>[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Brownstein, Alan
>Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 4:36 PM
>To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
>Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
>religioussymbols
>
>Do you th
& Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Alan: Can you flesh out the discrimination theory more? I take
it that the claim is that requiring everyone to display something would
constit
ject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Alan: Can you flesh out the discrimination theory more? I take
it that the claim is that requiring everyone to display something would
constitute discrimination (not just failure to accommo
onlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Brownstein, Alan
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 4:36 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Do you think there is a
cs
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
It's possible that the question has not arisen, and that if a
non-Christian employee objected to having an item displayed on his workstation,
the bank would accommodate him.
It's not clear t
, December 17, 2010 3:37 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Very interesting, thanks! But I'm a bit confused by the Kansas
City Fed chairman's statement,
http://www
ademics
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
Very interesting, thanks! But I'm a bit confused by the Kansas
City Fed chairman's statement,
http://www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/newsroom/2010pdf/press.release.12.17.pdf
. It
ember 17, 2010 3:31 PM
To: 'Law & Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
This story from the Oklahoma City newspaper indicates that the Federal Reserve
has changed its position about the bank and the i
_
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 3:09 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Federal regulators apparently force bank to take down
religioussymbols
26 matches
Mail list logo
