://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol91/index.php and
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/birth-control-linked-heart-attack-stroke/story?id=16559498,
for example.
CC: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
From: hamilto...@aol.com
Subject: Re: The nonprofit contraception services cases
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014
contraception services cases
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:06:25 -0500
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edumailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Because medical treatment and health coverage for it is determined by neutral
criteria like science and economics. Religion is not on the same footing--
indeed
Of Greg Lipper
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 3:21 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: The nonprofit contraception services cases
One further note, related to Marci's question, and detailed in our intervention
papers: Notre Dame has emphasized the secular nature of its benefits
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: The nonprofit contraception services cases
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:30:40 +
Stuart, is your position that all women should stop using oral contraception,
and/or (2) employers are better equipped to weigh the benefits/risks of
contraception than women
: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2014 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: The nonprofit contraception services cases
Courts can always test sincerity and the substantiality of the burden though in
these cases, several courts have treated substantial as functionally
: The nonprofit contraception services cases
Marty-- could you please elaborate on your response? I am not following this
exchange
Thanks--
Marci
Marci A. Hamilton
Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo Law School
Yeshiva University
@Marci_Hamilton
On Jan 3, 2014
: The nonprofit contraception services cases
This is strictly an informational question-- is Notre Dame allowed to
discriminate on the basis of religion in undergraduate admission?
Marci A. Hamilton
Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo Law School
Yeshiva University
@Marci_Hamilton
On Jan 6
Religion issues for Law Academics
*Cc:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* Re: The nonprofit contraception services cases
Marty-- could you please elaborate on your response? I am not following
this exchange
Thanks--
Marci
Marci A. Hamilton
Verkuil Chair in Public
-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Marci Hamilton
*Sent:* Friday, January 03, 2014 1:42 PM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Cc:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* Re: The nonprofit contraception services cases
Marty-- could you please elaborate on your response
Hamilton
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 3:08 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Cc: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: The nonprofit contraception services cases
This is strictly an informational question-- is Notre Dame allowed to
discriminate on the basis
contraception services cases
Marty-- could you please elaborate on your response? I am not following
this exchange
Thanks--
Marci
Marci A. Hamilton
Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo Law School
Yeshiva University
@Marci_Hamilton
On Jan 3
: The nonprofit contraception services cases
This is strictly an informational question-- is Notre Dame allowed to
discriminate on the basis of religion in undergraduate admission?
Marci A. Hamilton
Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo Law School
Yeshiva University
@Marci_Hamilton
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 3:08 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Cc: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: The nonprofit contraception services cases
This is strictly an informational question-- is Notre Dame allowed to
discriminate on the basis of religion
:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Marci Hamilton
*Sent:* Friday, January 03, 2014 1:42 PM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Cc:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* Re: The nonprofit contraception services cases
It seems to me that there is a much less nefarious explanation. In the context
of those Establishment Clause challenges, it was permissible for a religious
entity like Notre Dame to receive the government funds so long as they were not
used for items deemed to be inherently religious
Ok-- I am confused. Is Derek saying federal funds subsidiz Notre Dame's health
care system?
Marci A. Hamilton
Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo Law School
Yeshiva University
@Marci_Hamilton
On Jan 6, 2014, at 8:45 PM, Gaubatz, Derek dgaub...@imb.org wrote:
It seems to
The government's brief in *Little Sisters*:
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2014/01/government-bref-in-little-sisters.html
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Marty Lederman lederman.ma...@gmail.comwrote:
Another post, this one about the nonprofit cases that have now wound their
way to the Court . .
Why don't all these religious nonprofits choose Christian Brothers Services as
their health insurer? That way, certification or not, the employees will not
receive the services to which the employer objects? Something is missing from
this narrative.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 3, 2014, at
They will -- the government realizes that its plan is undermined and is
reassessing
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 3, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Ira Lupu icl...@law.gwu.edu wrote:
Why don't all these religious nonprofits choose Christian Brothers Services
as their health insurer? That way,
Marty-- could you please elaborate on your response? I am not following this
exchange
Thanks--
Marci
Marci A. Hamilton
Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo Law School
Yeshiva University
@Marci_Hamilton
On Jan 3, 2014, at 12:43 PM, Marty Lederman lederman.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
I meant that shorthand only to repeat what I wrote in my post:
The *Little Sisters* case reveals a lacuna in the government's secondary
accommodation regulation that the government itself presumably did not
anticipate--namely, that the regulation does not guarantee contraception
coverage for
: The nonprofit contraception services cases
Why don't all these religious nonprofits choose Christian Brothers Services as
their health insurer? That way, certification or not, the employees will not
receive the services to which the employer objects? Something is missing from
Another post, this one about the nonprofit cases that have now wound their
way to the Court . . .
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2014/01/not-quite-hobby-lobby-nonprofit-cases.html
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Marty Lederman lederman.ma...@gmail.comwrote:
Since no one else has mentioned it, I
23 matches
Mail list logo
