mch wrote:
>I think much of the problem is in the tuning caps on both the exciter and PA.
>
>Joe M.
>
>ac0y5 wrote:
>
>
>>It seems a lot of the complaints are from oscillator drift and tuning drift.
>>I have a few questions Does anyone know if the main problem resides in the
>>exciter, or the
I think its a combination of inferior components and poor design. The
receiver is quite sensitive,but not very selective and overloads easily. You
would be better off dropping some GE or /\/\ boards in it.
73,Lee
- Original Message -
From: "ac0y5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday,
The rangers not going to like this one
Yogi.
tom n8ies
- Original Message -
From:
NØATH
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
; N9HG Weird
Harold
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:56
PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: Fw: If
guys designed Christmas wra
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Neil McKie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
"Could that be the same as the MIB used with the pagers? "
So far as I am aware the MIB = Mostar Interface Box [01-80355A26] was
used exclusively for prog
I think much of the problem is in the
tuning caps on both the exciter and PA.
Joe M.
ac0y5 wrote:
>
> It seems a lot of the complaints are from oscillator drift and
> tuning drift. I have a few questions Does anyone know if the main
> problem resides in the exciter, or the power amp? My plan wou
Sorry Guys - not the kind of thing I normally send
to the group - I guess I just messed up
Please accept my apology !! Dave //
NØATH
- Original Message -
From:
Mike Perryman
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:23
PM
Subjec
Cool paper though..
mike
At 10:22 PM 11/26/03 -0500, you wrote:
I
don't think was related to repeater-building!
-Original Message-
From: NØATH
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:56 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com; N9HG Weird Harold
Subject: [Repeate
It seems a lot of the complaints are from oscillator drift and
tuning drift. I have a few questions Does anyone know if the main
problem resides in the exciter, or the power amp? My plan would
eliminate all problems related to the oscillator because the Tx and
Rx will be generated from a pair o
I
don't think was related to repeater-building!
-Original Message-From: NØATH
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:56
PMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com; N9HG Weird
HaroldSubject: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: Fw: If guys designed
Christmas wrappin
How many cavities do you have for 500kc split? A transistor pa with 1
meg takes at least 4 to run 40 watts, this is a split site? Is your
antenna a shunt style?
John Clark wrote:
>
> Has anyone had any success or failure in using a 60 watt Mitrek for a
> repeater on a 500 kHz seperation?
> Shoul
I doubt if this can be used anymore as the spectrum is narrow band, if
this is 4 or 5 plus years old it may be moved to ham band?
> "Daniel V. Keane" wrote:
>
> I have recently acquired a Regency Repeater. I know nothing about it
> and am looking for any information or manuals. The crystals wil
Got it working Virden. Thanks for help. You confirmed it was single pair
audio, so it was simple matter tracing cable with standard telco signal tracer.
Best regards, Bob
>
> From: Virden Clark Beckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/11/26 Wed AM 07:32:18 EST
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogro
Could that be the same as the MIB used with the pagers?
Neil - WA6KLA
nj902 wrote:
>
> --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Bruce Forestal
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "... Does anyone have a MIB schematic..."
>
>
> Unfortunately, even w
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Bruce Forestal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"... Does anyone have a MIB schematic..."
Unfortunately, even when you bought a MIB new from Motorola, the
documentation that came with it did not contain a schematic.
MIBs are almost non-existant these days. Does anyone have a MIB
schematic they are willing to share?
Thanks in advance,
Bruce WB6ARE
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
I'm looking for a manual for a VHF Mostar, the display version is best
but the NVR version will work too. I can pay via PayPal, cashiers
check.
Thanks in advance,
Bruce WB6ARE
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Either you really like the under-dog, or you crave attention. This issue had
been going on for MANY years. There is NO WAY that Spectrum could NOT know of
their reputation. (Which ranks at about the same level as Genave FM gear & the
early Regency gear)
ac0y5 wrote:
> Would anyone posting to th
If you don't mind I'd appreciate it. I'll email you direct from my main email. Thank you so much.
D"Steve S. Bosshard (NU5D)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can scan and send jpgs if you like.ssb- Original Message - From: "uplink28" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003
I have recently acquired a Regency
Repeater. I know nothing about it and am looking for any information or
manuals. The crystals will need to be changed for GMRS use
(462.550).
It says: FCC DATA: Regency UHF
Repeater Micro Com UO1R
What is the difference between above and a
U1OR?
Has anyone had any success or failure in using a 60 watt Mitrek for a repeater
on a 500 kHz seperation?
Should I use two seperate Mitreks for TX / RX to prevent internal desence?
Should I reconsider my frequency pair and use a 1 MHz?
In my installation, the radio will be on a tower in a cabnet les
Tom Manning wrote:
> Adi
> The Syntor makes a very good vhf mobile radio but requires an extensive
> modification. Go to www.piexx.com/synDoc/syndoc.html.
> This makes a very good mobile radio.
> Tom Manning, af4ug
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
No, it doesn't-just program it and tune it up. No mods.
T
Regency Low band Worlds first scanning transmitter. Wasn't planned that
way but if vswr was over 1:1.01 it covered the spectrum...
Gene W7UVH
At 03:51 AM 11/26/03, you wrote:
>Funny you should mention Regency. My nickname for them has always been
>"re-junk-cy."
>
>And while we're bashing di
Based on his enthusiasm for what lies ahead, I am betting they hire him
if he can make it stable for a one month period. Then he can take calls
from all of us about "why does it drift away so far when the tempurature
only changes 15 degrees in that room?". And he can have a spinning wheel
like the
Not Edsel, that was a great car before it's time - like the dusenburg.
Spectrum is like a first time go cart, have motor will travel,
delivering newspapers in your hometown tomorrow and replacing the pony
express next week.
NØATH wrote:
>
> Edsel perhaps?
> - Original Message -
> From: "m
Use a butt set and ring out the lines - you should hear your audio going
in and out from the unit. Of course without manuals for each layer of
components you are going to be doing a lot of guessing what they really
are for, and troubleshooting will be very embarrasing.
Robert Purvis VE3INY wrote:
Funny you should mention Regency. My nickname for them has always been
"re-junk-cy."
And while we're bashing different manufacturers of repeater equipment,
there's at least one controller out there that is a real dog. Been several
revisions to it, but it stays a dog.
Need we go on about antennas.
Would Spectrum take you to court?
Neil
ac0y5 wrote:
>
> Would anyone posting to the SCR1000 stuff mind if I foward all of
> them to Spectrum and ask them to respond to them? They should know
> about their reputation maybe they would like to respond one way or
> another.
> 73 All
> AC0Y
>
Try http://www.piexx.com/synDoc/syndoc.html
Neil
Tom Manning wrote:
>
> Adi
> The Syntor makes a very good vhf mobile radio but requires an extensive
> modification. Go to www.piexx.com/synDoc/syndoc.html.
> This makes a very good mobile radio.
> Tom Manning, af4ug
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Gee, they could have had a Genave...
Back in the late 70's both Gatesville, N5DDR/R, and Lampasas, W5GFR/R
bought Spectrum 2M repeaters. Gatesville had a phone patch, and
Lampasas was stand alone. Both used single antenna, and WP641
duplexers. Lampasas is dead. Gatesville is still running with
29 matches
Mail list logo
