On Nov 9, 2007, at 2:07 AM, MCH wrote:
> In fact, this is usually more helpful since it's the offending TX they
> are looking for. IF you have multiple IDs, how do you know which TX is
> causing the interference?
Send warning letters to all of them, and let God sort it out... to
paraphrase a f
In fact, this is usually more helpful since it's the offending TX they
are looking for. IF you have multiple IDs, how do you know which TX is
causing the interference?
If each TX ID is unique to that TX, you know which one it is. This is
also an issue with multiple repeaters TXing the same callsig
John, a couple of comments...
Duplex is the ability to talk and listen, send and receive, simultaneously,
nothing more.
In telephones, the technical challenge was to amplify baseband audio in both
directions over long circuits without creating feedback, which required keeping
the two audio pat
On Nov 8, 2007, at 7:39 PM, John Barrett wrote:
> besides the fact that a person using a repeater is still bound to
> the 10 minute ID rule, so some of the input must be mixed to the
> output or the user would never be heard to ID on the output while
> the patch was in operation.
Another
On Nov 8, 2007, at 8:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> To this day, I frequently run in-band full duplex. Just sort of an
>> old
>> habit :-)
>
> I assume your repeater doesn't have ADMs.
Or VoIP links with lossy/compressed CODEC's. :-)
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, 2007 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] "Full Duplex"
At 11/8/2007 18:13, you wrote:
>At 06:02 PM 11/8/2007, you wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>In practice, this would drive licensees and control ops nuts, because the
>>mobile station&#
and most autopatches have
timers limiting calls to less than 10 minutes.
73, Paul AE4KR
- Original Message -
From: John Barrett
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 6:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] "Full Duplex"
Ohh ther
At 11/8/2007 18:13, you wrote:
>At 06:02 PM 11/8/2007, you wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>In practice, this would drive licensees and control ops nuts, because the
>>mobile station's audio would not appear on the repeater output, and
>>anyone monitoring the repeater would only hear the landline party,
>>w
: Thursday, November 08, 2007 8:02 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] "Full Duplex"
Nate,
The telephone industry standard definition for the term "duplex" means able
to listen and talk simultaneously; the ability to have a channel in both
At 06:02 PM 11/8/2007, you wrote:
In practice, this would drive licensees and control ops nuts,
because the mobile station's audio would not appear on the repeater
output, and anyone monitoring the repeater would only hear the
landline party, without the mobile station's side of the call.
Nate,
The telephone industry standard definition for the term "duplex" means able to
listen and talk simultaneously; the ability to have a channel in both
directions at the same time, without the need for push-to-talk.
In essence, if you can interrupt the other party without waiting for him to
11 matches
Mail list logo
