Hi Ian,
You have the Canadian UHF PA, which you can obviously see is a
lower powered unit. The docs for said are in the loose leaf binder
type Canadian Manual and the PA is "similar to" some of the lower
powered UHF Mitrek Mobiles.
Some of the Low Power UHF PA's I have here will do up to ab
Hi Tony
Based on your information and your callsign I would suspect
the MSR-2000 receiver and transmitter modules you have there
were probably removed from what I call "Line A and above"
radio services (which is a northern portion of the US and
Canada) Although we do have a number of Governme
Splatter hasn't been a problem yet... from someone doing narrow
band operation in more than one very large Metro Area.
cheers,
s.
> Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Adjacent channel rejection just isn't adequate for narrowband
> operation. It will hear splatter from adjacent channel users.
skipp025 wrote:
>> Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> They will already operate narrow band without any modification.
>>>
>> Not an MSR-2000! They stopped making those before the NB mandate
>> came into being.
>
> The mandate in place being the requirement for narrow
> band operation?
Rig
> Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > They will already operate narrow band without any modification.
> >
>
> Not an MSR-2000! They stopped making those before the NB mandate
> came into being.
The mandate in place being the requirement for narrow
band operation?
> You can turn the deviati
skipp025 wrote:
> The only issue might be getting the receiver up to the 440-450
> range and maybe reduced output from the high power 110w PAs.
> If you can get them cheap they are well worth using. You
> can also trade them with us here in the US for mid range
> receivers as we use the 420
Hi Jessie,
What I call the Canadian 40 watt PA is pretty much a Mitrek Mobile
50 watt board in the same 110 watt chassis. There is no easy way
to tell the difference from the outside unless you know the model
numbers.
The Canadian PA works mucho fine as built. Most will do at or above
45 to
The only issue might be getting the receiver up to the 440-450
range and maybe reduced output from the high power 110w PAs.
If you can get them cheap they are well worth using. You
can also trade them with us here in the US for mid range
receivers as we use the 420 band for linking.
They
Thanks,
Living in BC here, we see quite a few Low Band UHF repeaters. RCMP,
Forestry, Highways, to name a few, used low band UHF as link frequencies, so
when a hub repeater went up it was low band. These have come out of service
now, because of narrow banding, and its just a matter if figuring o
Hi Jesse,
Working from a memory polluted by a few bad choices back in the
late 70's... There should be three most common range of the UHF
MSR-2000. The low UHF Range was about 409 to 430 MHz, the formal
band edges escape me.
The mid UHF range operation is 450 to about 490 typical. The
T-B
Hi Brian,
Should be a plug and play drop in Module Change if you have
the single duplex ctcss module laying horizontal in the upper
left side of the Backplane slot(s).
cheers,
skipp
> Brian Alesio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Group,
>
> To change a MSR 2000 UHF repeater from PL to
.
73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jesse Lloyd
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 11:12 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MSR 2000 UHF Band
Splits
Maybe if I can get close to a UHF Manual on Monday... The simple
check is to remove the receiver and transmitter cover and read the
frequencies off the channel elements. Unless someone has removed
the channel elements...
skipp
>"Jesse Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking at a repe
I'm looking at a repeater with the model no of C7465B3106. Any Idea which
split that would be?
On 8/26/07, skipp025 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jesse,
>
> A quick sum of the UHF MSR-2000 band splits normally described
> as three choices. A low range 403-430 model, the 450-483 MHz
> mode
Hi Jesse,
A quick sum of the UHF MSR-2000 band splits normally described
as three choices. A low range 403-430 model, the 450-483 MHz
model and the "T-Band" high range 483-512 range. the 483 value
might be a plus or minus a bit but those two ranges work toward
those values.
You will not ge
Hi Ed,
Very tempting for me to simply offer to trade you
for a standard 450 MHz range receiver. It would
be neat to have something down in the sub band
range. I'll think about that...
The first option would be to trade for a standard
range receiver strip where possible.
The second opti
had problems with them.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: skipp025 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 12:33 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [SPAM] - [Repeater-Builder] re: MSR-2000 UHF PA in the Amateur
Band - Email found in subject
> "K
> "Kevin Bednar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Skipp. I believe the fella I'm getting
> them from has a manual available as well.
Great, the manuals are really a must have.
To cover the UHF MSR, you actually need all
three manuals (unless you have the microfiche).
The power supplies
Yes, it will.
skipp
www.radiowrench.com
> John Place <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would like to know if the UHF version will tune down like the vhf unit
> without mods?
>
> --
> Amateur Radio
> W4HNK EM92vx
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://gro
19 matches
Mail list logo
