Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-27 Thread Jim
Al Wolfe wrote: Eric, Thanks for your quick response. It's true that most of the ham grade portables have far too much tone deviation as delivered. The issue here is only with VX6's so far. Of the VX6's actually measured one was only 200 Hz deviation and all seemed low, that is, none

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-27 Thread Nate Duehr
Jim wrote: Al Wolfe wrote: Eric, Thanks for your quick response. It's true that most of the ham grade portables have far too much tone deviation as delivered. The issue here is only with VX6's so far. Of the VX6's actually measured one was only 200 Hz deviation and all seemed low, that

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-26 Thread Milt
PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 9:09 AM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL Eric, Thanks for your quick response. It's true that most of the ham grade portables have far too much tone deviation as delivered. The issue here is only

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-26 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Drop in a Com Spec Board in the repeater and solve your problem. Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: Al Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 9:09 AM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL Eric, Thanks

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-26 Thread Nate Duehr
On Sep 26, 2007, at 7:09 AM, Al Wolfe wrote: So the questions remain: Is the Quantar PL sensitivity adjustable? Is it a good thing to make it more sensitive? How do I convince some users that there may be a problem with their radio? Not trying to sound sarcastic here at all, just

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-26 Thread MCH
I doubt you would get far with Motorola since the problem is that Yaesu is not using good engineering practice by not filtering the TX audio to remove CTCSS components. I would start with Yaesu asking them why not. Joe M. Nate Duehr wrote: On Sep 26, 2007, at 7:09 AM, Al Wolfe wrote:

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-26 Thread Eric Lemmon
] On Behalf Of MCH Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 11:26 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL I doubt you would get far with Motorola since the problem is that Yaesu is not using good engineering practice by not filtering the TX audio to remove CTCSS

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL

2007-09-26 Thread Nate Duehr
Tony L. wrote: I own a VX6 and regularly use a local Quantar repeater without any problems. To the best of my knowledge, the Quantar is stock. I also know of at least two people using VX-6's through a digital-capable (set in dual-mode analog and P25, they're of course using analog!)