Russell Gold wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:04:17 +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I kinda disagree. Eclipse 'forces' you to enter the http of the
repository from which you can get a plugin, and AFAIK it has not
become (yet?) unwieldy.
Plugins are not the same
Tim O'Brien wrote:
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
This is something that is already present in the JJar[1] project.
Wouldn't it suffice to just tell the system in what
repository to look for to get a certain artifact?
Sure, you could do this, but then you ge
ermits project artifacts not to be put inside ibiblio, with the
security and access issues that it brings.
I'm fine with the proposed layout, or any other reasonable alternative,
as it does not interfere with the above, being still http and file based.
Great.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi
ile (think /etc/hosts
before the existence of DNS - hackish but it worked).
This is something that is already present in the JJar[1] project.
Wouldn't it suffice to just tell the system in what repository to look
for to get a certain artifact?
[1] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox
or any other reasonable alternative,
as it does not interfere with the above, being still http and file based.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
Brett Porter wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Ass Brett Porter has written, and I agree:
I hope the extra s was a slip up :)
Sorry :-/
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 16:39, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
The Depot project SVN
is still there, ready to be used if/when needed by the Maven project.
From the Magic project we have spun off what we call Transit, which provides a
simple, flexible and powerful solution to
MAIL PROTECTED] list and wikis should
support and point users to the Maven repository handling code.
Does this sound reasonable?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
No response, thus nudging again 8-)
Original Message
Subject: Artifact publishing system ( was Re: md5's)
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 01:39:29 +0200
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: 'Noel J. Bergman&#x
it would be fairly easy to
>> add hook and authz support, so that authorizing access to a file
>> system area would be the same as we use for SVN.
>> Also, we'd have hooks that could perform actions when changes are
>> made.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi
4 15:32:14 +0100
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>1 - people making releases have to log into the release server
>>2 - there is no notification of files bein
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
plugin...hibernate is already in the ibiblio repository.
Good, I just asked for extra precaution :-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
.pom.md5
wrote 295 bytes read 181387 bytes 854.97 bytes/sec
total size is 317178373 speedup is 1745.79
Isn't Hibernate LGPL, which the ASF does not want to distribute?
Is this plugin also LGPL?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta m
very happy with it. MAybe you can use that for
discussing in Opensource projects. Webmail is annoying to say the least
for this (I sis the same thing once, from Outlook to webmail, etc ;-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(
ating new accounts, lists, etc.
BTW, this is a reason IMHO that shows how a notifocation system can
increase the control loop over what we publish.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
, and I applaud
Mark's efforts to do so.
I do to.
Sorry, I have not helped much. Where do we stand now? What can I help to do?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 14:41, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
...
We should seriously consider establishing a "standards" community
to establish supporting efforts such as this.
This list is our "standards" community.
While trying t
publish the jars in a parallel structure that
is used for the maven repo.
WDYT?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
on this project and its model?
That it has nothing to show, only ideas and musings. We already have
working systems, and also a possible 2.0 spec that has come out of
discussions here.
We still have to finish to implement the 1.0 spec at Apache, and IMHO
this is what we should foc
Markus M. May wrote:
>
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
...
it more configurable, currently all md5 checksums generated using Maven
are broken because of this, I think others have recognized this and
generate them by hand on their own.
In Ruper we ha
ith the md5 format? :-)
I am seeing that you are struggling to set up the repository for Apache,
and it's unfortunate, as it's a great thing if done well.
Depot guys, shall we give him a hand, and stop profiting from his kind
work without giving back? :-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi
would need also non-asf
jars that we don't want to distribute -> virtual artifacts.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
lways write 'definitely' correctly :-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
jar, and thought that getting the whole
distribution would be ok.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
ED]
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 09:31, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/11/2003 10:00:07 PM:
...
I mean, if:
1- the program opens the browser on the product download page
2 - the user does the download steps as usual
3 - the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/11/2003 10:00:07 PM:
Tim Anderson wrote:
...
A tool can 'screen scrape' the redirected page, prompt the user
to accept the license and only download if the license is accepted,
If the tool is made to
the tool is made to work like a web browser, ie show the pages and
then download when the user clicks on the button, IMHO it would be
perfectly acceptable.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
ssion.
*sigh*
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
x27;s lead and draft a response to the request for goals
and requirements.
It's not that complicated and these discussions shouldn't go on and on
and on into a 2000 word discourse on the all singing, all dancing
repository.
Exactly. +1 all the way
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi
OTECTED] mailing list. Noel is the
initial moderator.
If/when there is an infrastructure.apache.org set up, I'll move the
list to there.
(currently it is [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
If there is significant dissent, or the list falls into disuse, I'll
simply delete the list.
- Sam Ruby
AFAIK
by including proper information in
the project descriptor, be it the Maven POM or the Gump descriptor, and
have a system that periodically aggegated them in a nice searchable view.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions
e what happens.
Over at krysalis.org and here with Geronimo I have seen that when there
is a bunch of people with the same itch and an open CVS space, things
happen.
Shall we try it with Repo?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/11/2003 12:34:54 AM:
Reading Dion's messages I gather that there is no particular will of
Maven to participate ATM to an independent "Repo" project with active
development as ATM Maven is sat
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 11:51, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Howdy,
Just to keep you informed that I made an initial attempt today to get a
Maven repository setup here for use by Apache projects that wish to use
Maven.
...
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] community effort
nd adoption.
What do you guys think?
I would be more then happy to contribute this to this project.
Excellent :-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
/dist/httpd/binaries/aix/apache_1.3.26-000964804C00-ibm-aix4.3.tar.gz
It could be:
host: www.apache.org/dist
project: httpd
artifact-type: binaries/aix
The tar.gz format is more complex, and needs a different version
resolution system.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROT
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/10/2003 07:38:13
PM:
...
http://www.krysalis.org/version/
http://www.krysalis.org/ruper/ (draft site)
Just one note: the two primary Ruper2 and Version authors are Adam Jack
and Anou Man
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/10/2003 07:38:13 PM:
...
http://www.krysalis.org/version/
http://www.krysalis.org/ruper/ (draft site)
As I see it, these two projects are in a more advanced state than the
Maven code, so I would propose that we bu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's also the code in maven-new/fetch.
Correct, that has to be taken into account too.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
code nor the Version code, and will not actively partecipate in its
development. But there is a small community at krysalis that is working
like mad on these things, and I think that it might be beneficial to
Apache if it happens here instead.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL
build correctly, they will come.
If not, at least we tried.
What do you think?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
Erik Abele wrote, On 10/08/2003 22.46:
On 10/08/2003, at 08:51, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I don't know of any reason for it to not be public, but I'm cc'ing the
list.
I also can't see a reason to keep the list private, so +1 from my side :)
+1
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi
Leo Simons wrote, On 08/05/2003 10.19:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I've quickly looked at the proposal, and it's the same proposal as my
last mail on [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is the same as Costin's.
Is it correct?
yes (as I wrote :D).
Too long mail, dude ;-P
The next thing I would
instead directly point to the
mirror.
Also the use of md5s as Maven does or that it verifiues the integrity of
the downloaded files using signatures downloaded from our main
distribution directory.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, script
g that changes is that here there can be files in
${repo}/${project}/* while Maven doesn't have them there.
So, what about starting simply to publish jars in the mirroring system?
We can easily make the mirroring cgi script handle us the correct jar
from mirroring, the code is really strai
same
The only thing that changes is that here there can be files in
${repo}/${project}/* while Maven doesn't have them there.
So, what about starting simply to publish jars in the mirroring system?
We can easily make the mirroring cgi script handle us the correct jar
from mirrorin
tions, all of these and
others clearly indicate that we need metadata, and we need it in a
tool-agnostic way.
BTW, do you think you could invite here the Maven developers that are
discussing now about these issues on the Maven list, so we can get an
act together?
--
Nicola K
47 matches
Mail list logo
