review from multiple changelists/sources?

Reviewboard newbie here; apologies if this is a frequent or ill-advised question. I've got a reviewboard server running, I've successfully installed RBTools, I've successfully run rbt setup-repo to hook reviewboard up to my Perforce server. And I've successfully used rbt post to create a revie

Re: Page rendering and default route

Yes, used SQL a while back. I'll take a look Steve. On Friday, 12 July 2019 19:41:25 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: > > I see what’s going on... it’s in a sort of stuck state. Django is trying > to validate those URLs before you’re able to set new ones. > > You’re g

Re: Page rendering and default route

l/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/conf/__init__.py", line 110, in __setattr__ raise ImproperlyConfigured("If set, %s must end with a slash" % name) django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: If set, MEDIA_URL must end with a slash On Thursday, 11 July 2019 10:36:32

Re: Page rendering and default route

Hi Christian, Any thoughts on getting past this error. Can I remove MEDIA_URL and add it back once I understand the problem. Steve. On Monday, 1 July 2019 10:02:52 UTC+1, Steve wrote: > > Just comes back with the same error message below about " If set, > MEDIA_URL must en

Re: Page rendering and default route

Just comes back with the same error message below about " If set, MEDIA_URL must end with a slash". Doesn't seem to be able to get past the error. Steve. On Sunday, 30 June 2019 22:53:04 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: > > These settings are stored in the database. What

Re: Page rendering and default route

te to domain, only I cant see anything in the test site that would give me a clue. Or are we talking about settings in another file. Steve. On Saturday, 29 June 2019 05:37:08 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > The URL parameters are used to build the URLs to media fi

Re: Page rendering and default route

_media_url --value=/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media/ can't seem to get a list-siteconfig without the same error. Steve. On Thursday, 27 June 2019 12:17:49 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: > > You can use the set-siteconfig management command, like so: > > rb-sit

Re: Page rendering and default route

FOUND) (index):262 GET http://10.132.40.199/reviewboard/static/rb/js/base.min.af574b99af97.js net::ERR_ABORTED 404 (NOT FOUND) (index):264 Uncaught ReferenceError: RB is not defined at (index):264 (anonymous) @ (index):264 On Thursday, 27 June 2019 10:19:58 UTC+1, Steve wrote: > &

Re: Page rendering and default route

s/media", "site_static_root": "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/static", "site_static_url": "/reviewboard/static/", "site_media_url": "/reviewboard/media/", Where can I modify these. DEBUG = False Steve. O

Re: Page rendering and default route

Yes all present and correct. On Wednesday, 26 June 2019 16:39:44 UTC+1, Paul Mansfield wrote: > > check you have the following mappings in your apache config for reviewboard > > # Alias static media requests to filesystem > Alias /media "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media" > Alias /static "/var/

Page rendering and default route

then trac/svn works fine. Been through .conf, .wsgi and settings_local.py but cant seem to make it work. I thought that site route as /reviewboard/ would have changed it's focus but I guess not. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Steve. -- Supercharge your Review Board

Re: Path 6303924 does not match a valid Perforce path.

In ~/.reviewboardrc add: REPOSITORY_TYPE = "perforce" Got me past this error. -Steve On Tuesday, May 14, 2019 at 2:46:46 PM UTC-7, Harsh Verma wrote: > > Hi Darshan, > > I am running into the exact same issue and cannot post reviews using rbt. > Did you find a

Re: Review Board fails to create a review -- apparently failing to grab valid revision of files from SVN

Version: *Review Board* 2.5.2 -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users

Re: Review Board fails to create a review -- apparently failing to grab valid revision of files from SVN

On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 1:08:14 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > What version of Review Board are you using? > > Can you show me the appropriate line from the diff from `rbt diff`? The > entire set of diff headers (filenames + revisions

Review Board fails to create a review -- apparently failing to grab valid revision of files from SVN

When I try to manually post from the review board GUI for one specific SVN repository, it give me the following message: The specified diff file could not be parsed. Line undefined: No such revision 8525 In this case, revision 8525 is the original revision the change is based on and is

Review Board doesn't send emails

-l 0 root@reviewboard-2:/var/log/reviewboard# grep -i mail reviewboard.log | wc -l 0 Just to clarify - all the "Send e-mails when " checkboxes are checked and all the registered users have valid email addresses. Any suggestions for things I can poke or tweak gratefully receive

Re: RBTools 0.7.4: rbt post --diff-only no longer works

Hi David, Ticket opened: https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4368/ --Steve On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 2:34:51 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: > > I don't think we've heard about this before. Mind filing a bug? > > -David > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:15 AM

RBTools 0.7.4: rbt post --diff-only no longer works

description in Review Board has been overwritten with the description in my perforce change list. I searched for '--diff-only' in the bug tracker and didn't find anything, so I'm posting here to see if this is a known issue. Thanks --Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board

RBTools 0.7.4: rbt patch --px bug

I opened a ticket here: https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4364/ But I wanted to post it here as well for visibility since others may run into this. Thanks --Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for

Re: Python API: Delete a user from a review group

ust trying to programmatically prevent departed employees from ending up in review requests when they're members of review groups. --Steve On Wednesday, September 2, 2015 at 9:29:16 AM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > I'm trying to remove users from review groups using the Python API. T

Re: Python API: Delete a user from a review group

Thanks Steven for confirming that. I thought maybe I was going crazy! --Steve On Wednesday, September 2, 2015 at 2:24:50 PM UTC-7, Steven MacLeod wrote: > > It looks like it's not actually possible to delete a user from a review > group using the Python API at the moment. Revi

Python API: Delete a user from a review group

I'm trying to remove users from review groups using the Python API. The docs indicate that the review group user resource has a delete method, but I can't figure out how to get it to work. I can add a user to a group easily this way: g.get_users().create(username='steve&#

Re: Automating ReviewBoard testing with Selenium or some other tool?

I've exercised the basic functionality. Something like that would have exposed this problem. --Steve On Friday, July 10, 2015 at 12:28:04 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: > > Steve, > > Once upon a time we used Selenium to test the UI, but it's a complicated > and fragile sys

Automating ReviewBoard testing with Selenium or some other tool?

8 to 2.x, but I haven't written a web app test suite before and don't want to bite off more than I can chew. Thanks --Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommon

Re: RBTools: rbt post --diff-filename broken in 0.6.3 and 0.7.x

I was just notified by the issue tracker that a fix has been submitted for the diff-filename issue. I'll test drive it as soon as it becomes available. I hope a fix can be submitted soon for issue 3864 too so we can move to 0.7 :) Thanks! --steve On Tuesday, July 7, 2015 at 8:57:43 A

Re: RBTools: rbt post --diff-filename broken in 0.6.3 and 0.7.x

ilestone Also, just to clarify, the problem with 'rbt post --diff-filename' exists in 0.7.3 as well. See issue 3908: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3908&q=seide&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Component%20Owner%20Summary%20Milestone Thanks! -

RBTools: rbt post --diff-filename broken in 0.6.3 and 0.7.x

orks properly with RBTools 0.5.2. I opened issue 3908, but I wanted to post here as well for greater visibility. Thanks --Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rb

Re: ReviewBot: Problem moving from 0.1 to 0.2

wxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Sep 25 2013 Review_Bot_Extension-0.1-py2.6.egg drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jun 15 14:23 Review_Bot_Extension-0.2alpha0-py2.6.egg On Tuesday, June 16, 2015 at 10:12:58 AM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm upgraded a test server from ReviewBoard 1.

ReviewBot: Problem moving from 0.1 to 0.2

] succeeded in 1.39496517181s: False Is there some other step I need to take to upgrade the ReviewBot extension? --Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy us

Re: Problem updating existing reviews after changing perforce port in repository settings

Did the debug output shed any light on the problem? --steve On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 2:55:22 PM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > Sorry about the formatting. Note the existing review is associated with > change list 1423088 is RID 9175 which was created before I changed the repo &

Re: Problem updating existing reviews after changing perforce port in repository settings

um': 1423088, u'target_people': [], u'testing_done': u'', u'branch': u'' , u'last_updated': u'2015-06-09T17:02:45Z', u'time_added': u'2015-06-08T16:00:25Z', u'summary': u'Te st issue with p

Re: Problem updating existing reviews after changing perforce port in repository settings

would surprise me though because the repo ID is the same - just the port and description changed. --Steve On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 7:23:08 AM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > > > On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 3:00:31 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: >> >> Steve, >> >&

Re: Problem updating existing reviews after changing perforce port in repository settings

On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 3:00:31 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: > > Steve, > > It's pretty hard for us to do support for post-review, since it's > completely obsolete (and 0.5.2 is pretty old). That said, can you give us > the output of running post-review

Re: Problem updating existing reviews after changing perforce port in repository settings

I forgot to mention that I restarted memcached on the servers too, but the problem persists. --steve On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 9:28:21 AM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > We changed our DNS entry for our perforce server over the weekend which > required me to change our port settings in Re

Problem updating existing reviews after changing perforce port in repository settings

tand what I may have done wrong. We are currently using RBTools 0.5.2 and post-review, but we're planning to upgrade soon to 0.6.3 and rbt. Our RB version is 1.7.28. I'll try to test with the new RBTools, but I have a limited amount of old reviews that I can play with. Thanks --S

Re: RBTools: when and how is .rbtools-cookies written?

(args) # Enter username/password rbt_api = rbclient.get_root() rr = rbt_api.get_review_request(...) I don't fully understand the sequence, but it works and seems sensible so I thought I'd post it in case someone else runs into something similar. Thanks --Steve On Wednesday, June 3,

Re: RBTools: when and how is .rbtools-cookies written?

uot;, shel=True) subprocess.call(['rbt', 'post', '814']) or even os.system("rbt post 814") writes a cookie file with just the header and no session id. I'm baffled. How are others calling rbt from python scripts and getting authentication to wo

RBTools: when and how is .rbtools-cookies written?

from my calling directly into run_from_argv. I don't expect anyone to solve this for me but if I could get some clues as to where to look for the code that saves the cookie file that would be very helpful. Thanks! --Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewb

Re: RBTools 0.7.3 is released!

m, but not for the new one. The bug is 3864. Please let me know if I need to do anything more to get this issue reopened. Thanks! --Steve On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 at 5:48:26 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > We've put out a new release of RBTools 0.7.3,

ETA on RBTools 0.7.3?

Hi all, I'm planning to roll out some new tools at my company that require bug fixes in 0.7.3. I was wondering if you could provide a rough estimate of when 0.7.3 will be released so I can plan my rollout. Thanks! --Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:

Re: rbtools: How can I supress the INFO messages?

g.INFO) I don't know enough about logging to know it that's the preferred method, but it gets the job done :) --Steve On Saturday, May 9, 2015 at 8:22:37 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: > > I suggest looking at the init_logging method in > rbtools/commands/__init__.py > >

rbtools: How can I supress the INFO messages?

right direction? Thanks! --Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message

Re: RBTools 0.7.2: posting a review using a range of perforce change lists no longer works

, can be very confusing to memcached :) I turned off memcache and then got the diffs I was expecting. --Steve On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 10:49:14 AM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > Issue 3864 created. > > Thanks! > > --Steve > > > On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 7:14:07 P

Re: RBTools 0.7.2: posting a review using a range of perforce change lists no longer works

Issue 3864 created. Thanks! --Steve On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 7:14:07 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > Glad it hear it (with the exception of the diff not being correct). > > I'd appreciate a bug report on it. I won't be able to get to this

Re: RBTools 0.7.2: posting a review using a range of perforce change lists no longer works

range), so I'm going to have to investigate that some more and get back to you. Do I need to file a bug on this issue, or do you have enough already to resolve it? Thanks! --Steve On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 6:52:29 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > This

RBTools 0.7.2: posting a review using a range of perforce change lists no longer works

sions AssertionError When I ran it under a debugger, I found that it was trying to run p4 change //depot/Jam/MAIN/src/...@813,@823 which understandably failed. So something changed drastically between 0.6 and 0.7. Any ideas as to why this use case no longer works in 0.7? Please let me k

Re: RBtools and submitter issue and other questions

27;ve been doing that with --username $ rbt post --username sallan CL But that leaves a cookie behind in my name, so if the next person comes along and runs rbt without --username, they end up creating a review in my name, which is awkward. Maybe using --submit-as would be better? --steve O

Re: RBtools and submitter issue and other questions

Thanks David. I think I've been using --username when I should be using --submit-as. How does RB authenticate the --submit-as user? --Steve On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 5:02:49 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: > > --username is for authenticating to the review board server.

Re: RBtools and submitter issue and other questions

Which makes me wonder - what is the difference between the --username and --submit-as options? --Steve On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 11:11:13 PM UTC-7, MoonWalker wrote: > > Found it :-). Seems like --submit-as will do the trick > > On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 3:19:39 PM UTC+10

Re: RBTools: Is this a bug in the way 'rbt --username' handles authentication?

Issue 3858 created. Thanks --steve On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 6:58:46 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > This does seem to be a bug. I think it's worth filing a bug report. Thanks > for pointing it out! :) > > - Christian > > -- > Chr

RBTools: Is this a bug in the way 'rbt --username' handles authentication?

me to file a report? --Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this mes

Re: RBTools: rbt post -r ID changenum does not update the change list number in the review request

Issue 3855 entered. --Steve On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:22:32 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: > > Would you mind filing a bug on our issue tracker? > > Thanks, > -David > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:35 PM Steve > > wrote: > >> Oops, sorry for forget

Re: RB 1.7.28 with Python 2.6.6 is requring non-existant importlib

Yes, it's working now. And I checked my current 1.7.28 production servers and they all have importlib installed, but I don't know how or when it was installed. --Steve On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 2:55:52 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Weird. > > I just checke

Re: RB 1.7.28 with Python 2.6.6 is requring non-existant importlib

Here's what got installed: [root@localhost site-packages]# ls -d *jan* Django-1.4.20-py2.6.egg django_evolution-0.6.9-py2.6.egg django_pipeline-1.2.24-py2.6.egg --steve On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 2:33:12 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > We sh

Re: RB 1.7.28 with Python 2.6.6 is requring non-existant importlib

easy_install importlib fixes the problem, but it looks like a dependency is missing in the rb installer. --Steve On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 2:09:43 PM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > I've installed RB 1.7.28 on a new CentOS 6.6. VM which has python 2.6.6. > When I run > >

RB 1.7.28 with Python 2.6.6 is requring non-existant importlib

problem since I believe that's new in Python 2.7. Or was importlib supposed to be installed with RB? --Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user

Re: Installation of 1.7.28 on new CentOS 6.6 box fails to find django-evolution-0.6.9

Yup, it's all good now. Thanks! --Steve On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 12:37:07 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > Give it a try now. Looks like a recent migration of the django_evolution > packages resulted in that file being truncated. I've fix

Installation of 1.7.28 on new CentOS 6.6 box fails to find django-evolution-0.6.9

('distribute==0.6.10', 'console_scripts', 'easy_install')() Or is that something different. I'm not sure how to proceed. I tried leaving off the patch number and installing this way: easy_install ReviewBoard==1.7 But I got different, uglier errors, so I tho

Re: Command Line tool for Review Board administration

, tool="Perforce", path="localhost:1492") --Steve On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 3:43:18 AM UTC-7, GC wrote: > > Thanks for the reply Christian. As far as our requests related to > repositories is concerned, it’s only about adding (not updating) Name, > Repository

Re: RBTools: rbt post -r ID changenum does not update the change list number in the review request

Actually, maybe I should be testing out 2.5 anyway. I think I'll give that a try first. --steve On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 2:53:10 PM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > Will do. Thanks! > > > On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:22:32 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: >> >

Re: RBTools: rbt post -r ID changenum does not update the change list number in the review request

Will do. Thanks! On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:22:32 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: > > Would you mind filing a bug on our issue tracker? > > Thanks, > -David > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:35 PM Steve > > wrote: > >> Oops, sorry for forgetting that.

Re: RBTools: rbt post -r ID changenum does not update the change list number in the review request

Oops, sorry for forgetting that. Review Board 2.0.15 RBTools 0.7.2 --steve On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 2:22:17 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: > > What version of Review Board and RBTools are you running? > > -David > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:11 PM Steve > > wro

Re: RBTools: rbt post -r ID changenum does not update the change list number in the review request

being displayed in the review web page. Is it just me, or are others seeing the same behavior? --Steve On Monday, April 20, 2015 at 2:40:42 PM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > I've noticed that when I post diffs from a new change list to an existing > review request using the -r option t

RBTools: rbt post -r ID changenum does not update the change list number in the review request

ubmitted change list number, because the number in the review is not the one that was submitted. I hope that wasn't as confusing as it sounds. Thanks --Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you?

Re: Will changing the name of our perforce server cause us to lose access to old review diffs?

So simple I'm embarrassed I didn't think to try it. I take it the repo is identified internally by a DB key and as long as that is left in place, the name and host information can change. However it's done, it works as advertised! Thanks --Steve On Thursday, April 9, 2015 at

Will changing the name of our perforce server cause us to lose access to old review diffs?

e, it won't because that hostname will be gone. What behavior will I see if I rename the perforce server? Thanks --Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbc

Re: Can I create a new user in reviewboard using the Python Web API?

Adding a repo turned out to be easy: root = client.get_root() root.get_repositories().create(name='perforce', tool="Perforce", path="localhost:1492") I'm all set. Thanks! --Steve On Tuesday, April 7, 2015 at 7:40:50 AM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > Okay,

Re: Can I create a new user in reviewboard using the Python Web API?

Okay, makes sense. I can work around that. Is there support for adding a perforce repository via the API? That's the only other piece I need to automate my tests. Thanks --Steve On Monday, April 6, 2015 at 6:41:32 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > Ther

Can I create a new user in reviewboard using the Python Web API?

/localhost";) root = client.get_root() user = root.get_user(username="sallan") print user But I can't figure out how to create a new user in a script. Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks ---Steve -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.revi

Re: 500 error when superuser attempts to access admin console

On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 3:16:41 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > Just to check, if you go to the main Review Board dashboard (not the admin > dashboard), and then come back, does it work? > > No, that didn't make a difference. > Th

500 error when superuser attempts to access admin console

y2.7.egg/reviewboard/admin/views.py", line 39, in dashboard primary_widget_positions = profile_data.get('primary_widget_positions') AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get' Here's what my account looks like in the db: is_superuser: 1 username: sa

Re: Perl Syntax Highlighting working for .pm, but not .pl extensions

Upgrading Pygments to 1.6 fixed the problem. --Steve On Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:25:51 PM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > Knowing it should work helps. The .pl files I'm looking at are smaller > than the .pm files that work, so I'm going to rule out file size as the > cause

Is ReviewBot working with ReviewBoard 2.0?

We're currently using ReviewBoard 1.7.14 with the ReviewBot 0.1 (cppunit and python extensions) and we're considering moving to ReviewBoard 2.0. Anybody have experience, good or bad, with ReviewBoard 2.0 working with ReviewBot? Thanks -- -- Steve -- Get the Review Board Pow

Re: Perl Syntax Highlighting working for .pm, but not .pl extensions

Knowing it should work helps. The .pl files I'm looking at are smaller than the .pm files that work, so I'm going to rule out file size as the cause. I'll try to isolate the problem some more. Thanks --Steve On Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:01:21 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge w

Perl Syntax Highlighting working for .pm, but not .pl extensions

orking for some reason in RB. Is this a bug, or a configuration problem on our end? Any tips on how to troubleshoot this? Here's our version information: $ rb-site --version rb-site 1.7.14 $ pygmentize -V Pygments version 1.5, (c) 2006-2011 by Georg Brandl. Thanks -- Steve -- Get t

RBTools API: get_review_requests() returning conflicting results with/without the counts_only option

uot; Processed 6941 records Note that 6941 is the total number of review requests on this server. Is this a bug, or am I using this function incorrectly? RB Version: 1.7.14 RBTools Version: 0.5.2 Thanks -- -- Steve -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/

Re: Trouble posting diff to RB from git

Walt, After much head-scratching, I think I have finally discovered the problem: the repository permissions weren't set up properly on a few directories/files so that RB couldn't read them. Now your workflow seems to work for me (and others). Thank for all of your help! Steve On F

Re: Trouble posting diff to RB from git

--tracking-branch=release_branch Is this a normal process flow for git development using ReviewBoard? Thanks again, Steve On Friday, March 14, 2014 11:12:10 AM UTC-5, Steve Steele wrote: > > Walt, > > Thanks for your response. I was able to go to the mirror and run >

Re: Trouble posting diff to RB from git

cal. If I use origin/master I get a massive diff. If I use origin/release_branch or release_branch, I get a diff that fails to get pushed to RB. I know this isn't a git support group, but if anything sticks out, I'd appreciate any info you have. Thanks again, Steve On Thursday,

Trouble posting diff to RB from git

I'm having trouble getting my diffs to be uploaded to ReviewBoard: $ rbt post -d DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository... DEBUG:root:Running: svn info --non-interactive DEBUG:root:Command exited with rc 1: ['svn', 'info', '--non-interactive'] svn: '.' is not a working copy --- DEBUG:root

reviewbot logging

How do I enable logging for the reviewbot tools, and where are the logs written? I'm particularly interested in the logging messages in tools/process.py. --Steve -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCo

Re: Review Bot: How to manually run cppcheck and pep 8?

This question came up again today from one of our users. Has anyone done a manual run of the cppcheck or pep8 bots from reviewboard? On Thursday, September 26, 2013 2:37:01 PM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > I have the Review Bot extensions running and they're quick slick. On the >

Re: rbt status not working with perforce

Done: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3184 Thanks --Steve On Saturday, December 28, 2013 1:37:27 PM UTC-8, David Trowbridge wrote: > > Would you mind filing a bug? > > Thanks! > > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Steve >wrote: > >> I s

Unable to change server URL from 'localhost' to custom domain

on. I assume that the fix for this is to change the 'server url' setting under 'general settings' however whenever I do this, it always reverts back to localhost almost immediately afterwards. Is this an issue with reviewboard or am I doing something wrong? Cheers, Steve --

Re: rbt status not working with perforce

rbtools/rbtools/clients/perforce.py", line 298, in check_options if self.options.revision_range: AttributeError: Values instance has no attribute 'revision_range' --Steve On Friday, December 27, 2013 12:17:10 PM UTC-8, David Trowbridge wrote: > > I don't think we

rbt status not working with perforce

Displaying review requests from all repositories. r/79412 - Try with a smaller set of files. Is this already a know issue? --Steve -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/

Re: Downloading RBTools and Python API docs

That did the trick. Thanks! --steve On Friday, November 15, 2013 2:01:16 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > They can be built from source by going into the docs/rbtools/ directory > and typing 'make html'. We don't have any pre-built packages.

Downloading RBTools and Python API docs

I'd like to have access to the docs for RBTools and the Python API locally on my machine. Is there a place I can download the html docs? I didn't see it available on reviewboard.org, but I may not be looking in the right places. --Steve -- Get the Review Board Power Pa

Re: ReviewBoard server tips over about twice a week

Just to close the loop on this issue - we doubled the RAM on our server to 32GB and allocated 8GB to memcached. So far we've gone 2 weeks without any problems so it appears it was memcached that was thrashing. Thanks for all the input. ---Steve On Thursday, September 12, 2013 5:27:39 A

Re: Web API: review-requests?changenum=NNNN stopped working in 1.7.14

That seems to work. Curious that it worked previously without the '/'. Thanks! --Steve On Monday, September 30, 2013 4:31:23 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote: > > The problem is with a trailing slash. Try this URL: > > /api/review-requests/?changenum=N > > -David &

Web API: review-requests?changenum=NNNN stopped working in 1.7.14

wrong? Thanks --Steve -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: post-review only update testing-done field for existing request

I haven't tried this, but does it work if you include the --change-only option? --steve On Saturday, September 28, 2013 8:04:36 PM UTC-7, Lynn Lin wrote: > > Environment: > Git source code repostior > y Linux ubuntu > RBTools:0.5.2 > Reviewboard:1.6.1 > >

Review Bot: How to manually run cppcheck and pep 8?

ure out how to do it. I don't see any button, icon or text to trigger a manual run on the review page. How do I do that? Thanks! --Steve -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/

Re: Reviewbot: Should I see cppcheck and pep8 in my extension list?

that directory. So reviewbot is now working fine, and is actually pretty cool! --Steve On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 2:22:27 PM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > Okay, I restarted the reviewbot work as root and now the extensions show > up. The reviewbot-cookies.txt file was written in

Re: Reviewbot: Should I see cppcheck and pep8 in my extension list?

On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 2:08:28 PM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > This may be the problem. I'm running the reviewbot worker as apache and > seeing this error: > > [2013-09-25 10:57:33,786: WARNING/MainProcess] There was an error while > creating a cookie file:

Re: Reviewbot: Should I see cppcheck and pep8 in my extension list?

sage recommending against that. --Steve On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 11:43:42 AM UTC-7, Steve wrote: > > Sorry, I should have mentioned that I did that. I even restarted apache > and did the refresh again. I'm still not seeing any extensions. > > --Steve > > > On W

Re: Reviewbot: Should I see cppcheck and pep8 in my extension list?

Sorry, I should have mentioned that I did that. I even restarted apache and did the refresh again. I'm still not seeing any extensions. --Steve On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 11:24:22 AM UTC-7, Steven MacLeod wrote: > > Right after the section you've pasted, you'll

Reviewbot: Should I see cppcheck and pep8 in my extension list?

int = reviewbot.tools.cpplint:CPPLintTool', 'pep8 = reviewbot.tools.pep8:PEP8Tool', ], But it's not clear to me where that setting should be. --Steve -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: htt

Re: RBTools 5.x API: Can it be used to modify database?

Ah, a light bulb just went on. I was missing the link between the new RBTools API and the web resources. After reading your message I went back and read more carefully the section titled "Links Between Resources". Things are starting to make more sense to me now. Thanks! --

RBTools 5.x API: Can it be used to modify database?

available via the API? The online docs don't appear to be complete, but I may be missing something. Thanks Steve -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let

  1   2   3   >