Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-201357380
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-201358136
**[Test build #54186 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54186/consoleFull)**
for PR 11961 at commit
[`080a506`](https://gi
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11941#issuecomment-201359154
this is the same flaky test that's failing in other places with maven...
let me see if it's easy to fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#discussion_r57462635
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/RandomForestClassifier.scala
---
@@ -222,16 +222,10 @@ final class RandomForestClassificati
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11879
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#discussion_r57462916
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/GBTClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -119,6 +119,31 @@ class GBTClassifierSuite extends SparkFun
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57462957
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JSONRelation.scala
---
@@ -120,6 +122,39 @@ class DefaultSource extends File
Github user sethah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-201361949
cc @jkbradley whenever you get a chance, could you take a look? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57464019
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ private[sql] object FileSourceStra
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11941#issuecomment-201368662
@vanzio I fixed it in #11895
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11941#issuecomment-201369432
However, #11895 is blocked by #11940. It can not pass tests :(
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11959#issuecomment-201370396
Let me submit a PR for parsing `TOK_DESCDATABASE` and `TOK_DROPDATABASE`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11941#issuecomment-201370479
Cool, guess I'll wait for those, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57465015
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/HadoopFileLinesReader.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201373230
**[Test build #54183 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54183/consoleFull)**
for PR 11936 at commit
[`a26973e`](https://g
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#issuecomment-201373343
Overall looks good. Let's fix the serialization issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57465176
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ private[sql] object FileSourceStra
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201373903
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#issuecomment-201373865
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11802#discussion_r57465383
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContext.scala ---
@@ -246,9 +246,7 @@ class StreamingContext private[streaming] (
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11934#issuecomment-201374918
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201374973
**[Test build #54187 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54187/consoleFull)**
for PR 11945 at commit
[`d8f5d6e`](https://gi
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11960#discussion_r57465871
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/HadoopFileLinesReader.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201375961
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-201375885
**[Test build #54186 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54186/consoleFull)**
for PR 11961 at commit
[`080a506`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-201376022
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11961#issuecomment-201376017
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201376311
**[Test build #54175 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54175/consoleFull)**
for PR 11910 at commit
[`631c44c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201376459
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11934#issuecomment-201376305
**[Test build #54188 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54188/consoleFull)**
for PR 11934 at commit
[`947fc70`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201376467
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#issuecomment-201378532
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#issuecomment-201378536
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201378991
**[Test build #54187 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54187/consoleFull)**
for PR 11945 at commit
[`d8f5d6e`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201379419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11945#issuecomment-201379414
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#discussion_r57467872
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcRelation.scala ---
@@ -117,6 +123,66 @@ private[sql] class DefaultSource extends FileFormat
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#discussion_r57467951
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcRelation.scala ---
@@ -117,6 +123,66 @@ private[sql] class DefaultSource extends FileFormat
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-201381299
**[Test build #54190 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54190/consoleFull)**
for PR 11796 at commit
[`01d9f0d`](https://gi
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11950#issuecomment-201381524
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11936#discussion_r57468288
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcRelation.scala ---
@@ -291,10 +308,10 @@ private[orc] case class OrcTableScan(
val
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11953#issuecomment-201382352
thanks, done
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11953#issuecomment-201382523
**[Test build #54191 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54191/consoleFull)**
for PR 11953 at commit
[`2f43d41`](https://gi
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#issuecomment-201383428
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11953#issuecomment-201383385
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#issuecomment-201383515
**[Test build #54192 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54192/consoleFull)**
for PR 11623 at commit
[`c0e73cd`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201383708
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11920#issuecomment-201385003
OK. If it's pretty simple and there is no good reason to call reset (since
it kills the `SparkContext`) maybe it is worth blocking after all.
---
If your project is set
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201385697
**[Test build #54193 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54193/consoleFull)**
for PR 11910 at commit
[`631c44c`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11829#discussion_r57470219
--- Diff: bin/pyspark ---
@@ -49,7 +49,10 @@ if [[ -n "$IPYTHON_OPTS" || "$IPYTHON" == "1" ]]; then
# If IPython options are specified, assume user want
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#discussion_r57470403
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +102,65 @@ class StreamExecution(
priva
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11911#issuecomment-201389883
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11714
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11920#issuecomment-201392194
Thank you for the positive feedback. Indeed, it was just one-line change to
block `reset`.
All the others changes in that file is just about ScalaStyle correct
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#discussion_r57471001
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +102,65 @@ class StreamExecution(
priv
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11925#issuecomment-201393248
**[Test build #54194 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54194/consoleFull)**
for PR 11925 at commit
[`5eb63b6`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11911#issuecomment-201393204
**[Test build #54195 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54195/consoleFull)**
for PR 11911 at commit
[`f59c85f`](https://gi
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201393496
LGTM; looking at the code after my comment I think the shorter code is
safe, but that's a super minor thing anyway.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201397068
**[Test build #54197 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54197/consoleFull)**
for PR 11940 at commit
[`37343ca`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201397074
**[Test build #54196 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54196/consoleFull)**
for PR 11942 at commit
[`61d220b`](https://gi
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11326#discussion_r57471730
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -157,12 +157,14 @@ class HistoryServerSuite extends SparkFunS
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11326#discussion_r57471934
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -157,12 +157,14 @@ class HistoryServerSuite extends SparkFunSuit
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201399466
@vanzin Oh, no... `interrupted = Thread.interrupted()` is wrong. It should
not change `interrupted` to `false` if `Thread.interrupted()` returns false.
Reverting it.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201399560
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201399555
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201399544
**[Test build #54196 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54196/consoleFull)**
for PR 11942 at commit
[`61d220b`](https://g
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#discussion_r57472410
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -228,13 +288,17 @@ class StreamExecution(
comm
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11895#issuecomment-201398249
LGTM once we fix the maven test issues. Thanks for taking care of this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201400855
This logic is a little complex. Could you add some unit tests to make sure
this is correct?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201401202
> It should not change interrupted to false if Thread.interrupted() returns
false
Is that because there are multiple calls to
`runUninterruptiblyInMicroBatchThr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201401173
**[Test build #54198 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54198/consoleFull)**
for PR 11940 at commit
[`d8dcd04`](https://gi
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11326#discussion_r57473060
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -157,12 +157,14 @@ class HistoryServerSuite extends SparkFunS
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#discussion_r57473579
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +102,65 @@ class StreamExecution(
private
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201404121
> Is that because there are multiple calls to
runUninterruptiblyInMicroBatchThread, and you want to keep the interrupted
status across those calls? If that's the case,
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962
[SPARK-14161] [SQL] Native Parsing for DDL Comand Drop Database
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Based on the Hive DDL document
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displ
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962#issuecomment-201405785
cc @yhuai @hvanhovell @viirya Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201405645
**[Test build #54200 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54200/consoleFull)**
for PR 11940 at commit
[`9809acf`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962#issuecomment-201405643
**[Test build #54199 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54199/consoleFull)**
for PR 11962 at commit
[`8f20e5a`](https://gi
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201407257
> Since L157 calls microBatchThread.interrupt(), it's safe
I see; so how about simplifying things a bit. Can I suggest that you change
the name of the variable t
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11326#issuecomment-201408109
**[Test build #54202 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54202/consoleFull)**
for PR 11326 at commit
[`c20035c`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201408099
**[Test build #54201 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54201/consoleFull)**
for PR 11942 at commit
[`c3d0f61`](https://gi
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201414609
> I see; so how about simplifying things a bit. Can I suggest that you
change the name of the variable to shouldInterruptThread or something that more
explicitly says t
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201415819
I'm going to merge this one after tests pass to unblock other PRs. Will
address further comments in another PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201417804
**[Test build #54203 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54203/consoleFull)**
for PR 11940 at commit
[`45f1452`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201418463
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201418364
**[Test build #54201 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54201/consoleFull)**
for PR 11942 at commit
[`c3d0f61`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201418469
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11950
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11603#discussion_r57476945
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -33,6 +34,10 @@ package object config {
private[spark] val DRIVER_U
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11603#discussion_r57477150
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMasterArguments.scala
---
@@ -101,12 +91,8 @@ class ApplicationMasterArguments(val args
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-201425493
**[Test build #54178 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54178/consoleFull)**
for PR 11956 at commit
[`c26cead`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-201426182
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-201426171
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11603#discussion_r57477923
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -480,25 +495,16 @@ private[spark] class Client(
}
/**
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-201430662
**[Test build #54185 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54185/consoleFull)**
for PR 11796 at commit
[`976ce2c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-201431670
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11924#issuecomment-201431779
Let's merge it now as it fails several times per day. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-201431676
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11924
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11603#discussion_r57478478
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -510,10 +516,12 @@ private[spark] class Client(
* (3) whether to add
201 - 300 of 657 matches
Mail list logo
