Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12327#discussion_r59368815
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ClosureCleaner.scala ---
@@ -77,35 +77,19 @@ private[spark] object ClosureCleaner extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12327#issuecomment-208887603
**[Test build #55604 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55604/consoleFull)**
for PR 12327 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12327#discussion_r59368774
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ClosureCleaner.scala ---
@@ -77,35 +77,19 @@ private[spark] object ClosureCleaner extends Logging {
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12327#issuecomment-208886915
cc @yhuai @JoshRosen @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12327
[SPARK-14558][CORE] In ClosureCleaner, clean the outer pointer if it's a
REPL line object
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we clean a closure, if its outermost
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12299#issuecomment-208883192
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12299#issuecomment-208883187
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12299#issuecomment-208882923
**[Test build #55603 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55603/consoleFull)**
for PR 12299 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12303#issuecomment-208882828
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zhonghaihua commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12258#issuecomment-208881577
@JoshRosen @andrewor14 Could you verify this PR? Thanks a lot.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12299#issuecomment-208873482
So if the input is vector A, then instead of computing A'A we're computing,
for some mean vector M, (A-M)'(A-M) = A'A - A'M - M'A + M'M. A'A remains
efficient to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12299#issuecomment-208867520
**[Test build #55603 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55603/consoleFull)**
for PR 12299 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12299#issuecomment-208866819
@mengxr I implemented the suggestion. The sparse case is covered now too,
but, as you say I don't know that there's a faster algorithm for this once the
data is not
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12299#discussion_r59363128
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/BLAS.scala ---
@@ -267,7 +295,6 @@ private[spark] object BLAS extends Serializable with
Logging
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12299#discussion_r59363105
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/BLAS.scala ---
@@ -237,25 +237,53 @@ private[spark] object BLAS extends Serializable with
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12299#discussion_r59363070
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/BLAS.scala ---
@@ -237,25 +237,53 @@ private[spark] object BLAS extends Serializable with
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12303#issuecomment-208862182
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12303#issuecomment-208862392
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11365#issuecomment-208857657
@mengxr I run test on a dataset with a constant nonzero column.
* If ```fitIntercept==true```, Spark ```AFTSurvivalRegression``` and R
```survreg``` output the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12303#issuecomment-208847478
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12303#issuecomment-208847472
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12303#issuecomment-208847150
**[Test build #55602 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55602/consoleFull)**
for PR 12303 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12326#issuecomment-208828508
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12326#issuecomment-208828507
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12326#issuecomment-208828190
**[Test build #55601 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55601/consoleFull)**
for PR 12326 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12303#issuecomment-208826385
**[Test build #55602 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55602/consoleFull)**
for PR 12303 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12202#discussion_r59346482
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -169,6 +169,41 @@ private[recommendation] trait ALSParams extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-208812371
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-208812366
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-208812249
okay, fixed cc: @falaki
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-208812044
**[Test build #55599 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55599/consoleFull)**
for PR 12268 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-208810842
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-208810922
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-208810857
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-208810916
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-208810207
**[Test build #55598 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55598/consoleFull)**
for PR 12173 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-208810188
**[Test build #55597 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55597/consoleFull)**
for PR 12268 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12325#issuecomment-208798310
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12325#issuecomment-208798303
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12325#issuecomment-208798019
LGTM pending test run.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12325#issuecomment-208797928
**[Test build #55600 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55600/consoleFull)**
for PR 12325 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12079#issuecomment-208797154
A few minor comments, otherwise LGTM.
@holdenk @BryanCutler we could merge this and #12308, and then update the
param to be shared (if we can do the different
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12079#discussion_r59341296
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -512,14 +512,19 @@ class HashingTF(JavaTransformer, HasInputCol,
HasOutputCol, HasNumFeatures, Java
..
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12079#discussion_r59341354
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/feature.py ---
@@ -379,6 +379,17 @@ class HashingTF(object):
"""
def __init__(self, numFeatures=1 << 20):
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12326#issuecomment-208791039
I also noticed that `SqlNewHadoopRDD` is not used anymore. Just to double
check, this wouldn't mean necessarily this has to be removed?
---
If your project is set
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12324#issuecomment-208788653
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12324#issuecomment-208788643
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12324#issuecomment-208787493
**[Test build #55595 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55595/consoleFull)**
for PR 12324 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12326#issuecomment-208785393
**[Test build #55601 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55601/consoleFull)**
for PR 12326 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-208783933
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-208783925
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12326
[MINOR][SQL][DOCS] Remove some unused imports in datasources.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It looks several commits for datasources missed removing some unused
Github user joan38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12149#issuecomment-208783120
@marmbrus I think now we have a end to end test for both RDDs and Datasets.
Is that all good for you?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-208783126
**[Test build #55594 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55594/consoleFull)**
for PR 11301 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12079#discussion_r59339176
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -831,6 +831,25 @@ def test_logistic_regression_summary(self):
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12079#discussion_r59338971
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -512,14 +512,19 @@ class HashingTF(JavaTransformer, HasInputCol,
HasOutputCol, HasNumFeatures, Java
..
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12079#discussion_r59338620
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -512,14 +512,19 @@ class HashingTF(JavaTransformer, HasInputCol,
HasOutputCol, HasNumFeatures, Java
..
Github user chtyim commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12318#discussion_r59338307
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/HttpServer.scala ---
@@ -155,6 +156,7 @@ private[spark] class HttpServer(
throw new
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12308#issuecomment-208777193
LGTM otherwise.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12325#issuecomment-208776352
**[Test build #55600 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55600/consoleFull)**
for PR 12325 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12308#issuecomment-208773214
@holdenk @BryanCutler I'd say we could make `binary` shared, but the only
thing is currently the doc is a bit different between them (the doc for
`CountVectorizer`
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12325
[Minor] [MLlib] remove stale comment
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove the stale comment for KolmogorovSmirnovTest since the implementation
has been changed.
Let me
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12308#issuecomment-208771658
Will take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12209#issuecomment-208770702
@boneill42 if you'll reopen vs master I'll merge it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12157#issuecomment-208770255
@joan38 what do you think about moving forward with the style check, and at
least the changes that are uncontroversial here? some of these are good fixes.
---
If your
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12318#discussion_r59335396
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/HttpServer.scala ---
@@ -155,6 +156,7 @@ private[spark] class HttpServer(
throw new
Github user yaooqinn commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3438#issuecomment-208769628
Is there any progress about this mechanism study?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-208768839
**[Test build #55599 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55599/consoleFull)**
for PR 12268 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173#issuecomment-208766060
**[Test build #55598 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55598/consoleFull)**
for PR 12173 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-208765993
**[Test build #55597 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55597/consoleFull)**
for PR 12268 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#discussion_r59334349
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVRelation.scala
---
@@ -17,153 +17,197 @@
package
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12311#issuecomment-208763553
@zsxwing Could you help me to fix the streaming test suite? It seems
related to this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12079#discussion_r59334159
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -512,14 +512,19 @@ class HashingTF(JavaTransformer, HasInputCol,
HasOutputCol, HasNumFeatures, Java
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#discussion_r59334104
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVRelation.scala
---
@@ -17,153 +17,197 @@
package
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12285#issuecomment-208763429
**[Test build #2777 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2777/consoleFull)**
for PR 12285 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12311#issuecomment-208762764
**[Test build #2778 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2778/consoleFull)**
for PR 12311 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#discussion_r59333718
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVRelation.scala
---
@@ -17,153 +17,197 @@
package
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12320#issuecomment-208761316
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12320#issuecomment-208761311
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12320#issuecomment-208760904
**[Test build #55592 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55592/consoleFull)**
for PR 12320 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12280
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12280#issuecomment-208760839
Yeah I scanned it and looks good
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12280#issuecomment-208759696
Thanks - this looks good. I'm going to merge it, assuming @srowen took a
detailed look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11015#issuecomment-208754701
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11015#issuecomment-208754700
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user chtyim commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12318#discussion_r59331847
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/HttpServer.scala ---
@@ -155,6 +156,7 @@ private[spark] class HttpServer(
throw new
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11015#issuecomment-208754612
**[Test build #55596 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55596/consoleFull)**
for PR 11015 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12246#issuecomment-208752572
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12246#issuecomment-208752569
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#discussion_r59331281
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Imputer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12246#issuecomment-208752097
**[Test build #55590 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55590/consoleFull)**
for PR 12246 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12317#issuecomment-208751778
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11015#issuecomment-208751703
**[Test build #55596 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55596/consoleFull)**
for PR 11015 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12317#issuecomment-208751776
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#discussion_r59330944
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Imputer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12317#issuecomment-208751521
**[Test build #55589 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55589/consoleFull)**
for PR 12317 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12324#issuecomment-208746010
**[Test build #55595 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55595/consoleFull)**
for PR 12324 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12324
[SPARK-14125] [SQL] Native DDL Support: Alter View
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to provide a native DDL support for the following three Alter
View
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-208741852
**[Test build #55594 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55594/consoleFull)**
for PR 11301 at commit
Github user ouyangshourui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/961#issuecomment-208741187
I use spark1.5.2 on yarn,alse meeting the same problem:
16/04/12 14:36:45 ERROR scheduler.DAGScheduler: Failed to update
accumulators for ShuffleMapTask(32566,
601 - 700 of 740 matches
Mail list logo
