Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62195 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62195/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62194/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62194 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62194/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990#discussion_r70546286
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -393,3 +394,54 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14166
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r70545811
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -327,6 +326,32 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13409
**[Test build #62200 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62200/consoleFull)**
for PR 13409 at commit
GitHub user sharkdtu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14166
[MINOR][YARN] Fix code error in yarn-cluster unit test
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix code error in yarn-cluster unit test.
## How was this patch
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
**[Test build #62199 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62199/consoleFull)**
for PR 14165 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14138
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14138
thanks, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Hi, @hvanhovell . So far, I tried in the following way for `HINT_PREFIX`.
Due to the prefix overlapping, `BRACKETED_COMMENT` seems to eat the HINT.
Could you give me some advice more?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62197/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
**[Test build #62197 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62197/consoleFull)**
for PR 14165 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
**[Test build #62197 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62197/consoleFull)**
for PR 14165 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
**[Test build #62198 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62198/consoleFull)**
for PR 14132 at commit
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
[SPARK-16503] SparkSession should provide Spark version
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds the following to SparkSession:
```scala
/** The
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Now, only minor `HINT_PREFIX` remains.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62191/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62191 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62191/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
> If its the leveldb file not being created, that should be fixed by
aab99d3
That's great, and in my view that also means that any failure in the
startup of the shuffle service should
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
I'd be curious if you find out what was wrong with that node.
If its the leveldb file not being created, that should be fixed by
Github user nblintao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
Thanks, @ajbozarth. That's a great point. When no execution in a table has
SQL text, this column shouldn't be shown. I'll fix this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14152#discussion_r70541473
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/Checkpoint.scala ---
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
package org.apache.spark.streaming
import
Github user nblintao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158#discussion_r70541399
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/AllExecutionsPage.scala
---
@@ -103,6 +104,9 @@ private[ui] abstract class
Github user avulanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
@JeremyNixon Thanks for the comprehensive list of references!
The internal API of Spark ANN is designed to be flexible and can handle
different types of layers. However, only a part of the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
**[Test build #62196 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62196/consoleFull)**
for PR 14132 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
So far, I couldn't do the following two advices. I just inform you that I'm
still working these. :)
- `HINT_PREFIX`
- `| hintName=identifier '(' parameters+=identifier
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14147
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62193/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14147
**[Test build #62193 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62193/consoleFull)**
for PR 14147 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14147
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62195 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62195/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14161
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62189/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14161
**[Test build #62189 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62189/consoleFull)**
for PR 14161 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14161
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
@kishorvpatil thanks, I'll check it out
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62194 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62194/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
@ajbozarth, I have fixed the issue with safari exception. Its because
`parser.baseURI` is `null`. I switched to `document.baseURI`. It looks fine on
testing. Let me know if you still see this
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
Checked it out and gave it a test run and it looks good, just one issue.
When the user only uses the dataframes api it will never show any SQL Text
(only "-"), should we check if there is no SQL
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14164
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user damnMeddlingKid opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14164
Allow comparisons between UDTs and Datatypes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently UDTs can not be compared to Datatypes even if their sqlTypes
match. this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119
**[Test build #62192 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62192/consoleFull)**
for PR 14119 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62192/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
Some more info: you're correct in that, int this case, the application
eventually fails because containers keep getting started on the "bad" node.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14163
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user Sherry302 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14163
[SPARK-15923][YARN] Spark Application rest api returns 'no such app: â¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update monitoring.md.
â¦'
You can merge this pull
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14147
**[Test build #62193 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62193/consoleFull)**
for PR 14147 at commit
Github user aokolnychyi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119
**Summary of the updates**
- `JavaSparkSQL.java` file was removed. I kept it initially since the file
itself was quite old (2+ years) and it was present in your original WIP branch
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119
**[Test build #62192 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62192/consoleFull)**
for PR 14119 at commit
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34
**[Test build #48 has
finished](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/48/consoleFull)**
for PR 34 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
I'm trying to get access to more information about the original issue to
answer all the questions; I know it was caused because for some reason the YARN
"local-dirs" were all read only, and the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62191 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62191/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34
**[Test build #48 has
started](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/48/consoleFull)**
for PR 34 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14160
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14160
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62188/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14160
**[Test build #62188 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62188/consoleFull)**
for PR 14160 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
Correct, MR throws an exception, but again a lot of that is legacy from
hadoop 1.x when it was the only thing running. The auxiliary services were
added just for that originally. You could very
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
I'm back. I'll resolve them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
To answer my own question: the MR service throws exceptions when there's an
error during initialization. (See `ShuffleHandler.java`, there's no swallowing
of exceptions during `serviceInit` and
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
> What is the case you are seeing this issue? I'm ok with changing it if we
have a good reason.
Well, I guess "good reason" is in the eye of the beholder. :-) My argument
for the change is
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132#discussion_r70525213
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62190/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
**[Test build #62190 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62190/consoleFull)**
for PR 14162 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Actually, this PR makes that test more robust generally.
But, at the final commit of this PR, if this is not required, I will revert
the change on R side in order to make PR smaller.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Spark temporary views (tables) are included, too. When you specify any
databases, `show tables` also returns the tables of the database and the Spark
temporary table.
---
If your project is
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
So we had specifically decided to have this behavior when this was first
written. The reason is that an issue with the spark shuffle services shouldn't
stop other services from running fine on
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14113
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
cc @liancheng @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
**[Test build #62190 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62190/consoleFull)**
for PR 14162 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70519430
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,330 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r70519286
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -97,6 +97,49 @@ package object config {
.toSequence
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14161
**[Test build #62189 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62189/consoleFull)**
for PR 14161 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14161
LGTM if it passes tests, yes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
@tgravescs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
[SPARK-16505][yarn] Propagate error during shuffle service startup.
This prevents the NM from starting when something is wrong, which would
lead to later errors which are confusing and harder to
GitHub user keypointt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14161
[MINOR] Fix Java style errors and remove unused imports
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix Java style errors and remove unused imports, which are randomly found
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14160
I'll fix these styles, thanks a lot Sean
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13894
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62187/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13894
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14160
Yeah, the problem is we don't have anything that runs dev/lint-java
regularly. If you find it currently shows errors in master, go ahead and fix
them in a [MINOR] PR.
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13894
**[Test build #62187 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62187/consoleFull)**
for PR 13894 at commit
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14160
Hi @srowen I just found it's a duplicate so I closed it.
But, when I ran `./dev/lint-java` I got these style problems. I'm just
wondering for these random tiny style fixes, what should I
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14160
I don't know that there's actually a problem, just saying that this is the
kind of thing we should be careful about. There are a number of build warnings
like this. Your change could be fine.
---
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14160
oh I see...sorry didn't notice it's for backward compatibility
I'll close it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user keypointt closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14160
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14159
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14160 solves the same thing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14160
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14159 solves the same thing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Made a pass through and some mostly minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13894
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62185/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13894
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13894
**[Test build #62185 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62185/consoleFull)**
for PR 13894 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14160
The thing we have to be careful of in general is making some change that
isn't compatible with older versions of things like Hadoop (and their Parquet
dependencies). This change could break older
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
maybe I'm missing something, shouldn't `show tables` only returns tables
from the select database?
if I didn't `use information_schema` then `show tables` shouldn't include
`tables`,
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116#discussion_r70511249
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -502,20 +502,21 @@ test_that("jsonRDD() on a RDD with json string", {
})
101 - 200 of 545 matches
Mail list logo
