Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
cc @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Hi, @rxin .
Could you review this PR again when you have some time?
All the features are implemented and Spark Parser accepts general hints now.
---
If your project is set up for it, y
GitHub user brkyvz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14170
[MINOR][SQL][TEST] Remove timezone setting from DataFrameTimeWindowingSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's unnecessary. `QueryTest` already sets it.
You can merge
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14149
**[Test build #62204 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62204/consoleFull)**
for PR 14149 at commit
[`e69a026`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62203/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14111
cc @rxin @hvanhovell @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
**[Test build #62203 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62203/consoleFull)**
for PR 14169 at commit
[`671a2ba`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
**[Test build #62203 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62203/consoleFull)**
for PR 14169 at commit
[`671a2ba`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
[SPARK-16515][SQL]set default record reader and writer for script
transformation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `ScriptInputOutputSchema`, we read default `Reco
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14168
Sure
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user tilumi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14129
Ok, I'll change the implementation to non-array version and run benchmark
on both versions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
Addressed a comment. Since the following code cannot pass information on
`valueContainsNull = false`, I use the current code.
```
def map(mapType: MapType): AttributeReference =
Attribute
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62198/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34
**[Test build #49 has
finished](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/49/consoleFull)**
for PR 34 at commit
[`f5ea08c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
**[Test build #62198 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62198/consoleFull)**
for PR 14132 at commit
[`61e4b1b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14168
@ericl please open a JIRA ticket for this. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14168
**[Test build #62202 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62202/consoleFull)**
for PR 14168 at commit
[`4524d97`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14168
[MINOR] [SQL] Fix various regex codegen bugs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
RegexExtract and RegexReplace currently crash on non-nullable input due use
of a hard-coded l
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62199/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34
**[Test build #49 has
started](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/49/consoleFull)**
for PR 34 at commit
[`f5ea08c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f5
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14166#discussion_r70554897
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnClusterSuite.scala ---
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ class YarnClusterSuite extends BaseYarnClusterSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
**[Test build #62199 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62199/consoleFull)**
for PR 14165 at commit
[`97f6b92`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786
@vazin, sorry for the delay.
I think your concern is valid that this change will probably harm the
performance since 15 seconds (preemption waiting) is not a short time.
But your
Github user jerryshao closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7786
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14163#discussion_r70553491
--- Diff: docs/monitoring.md ---
@@ -224,10 +224,12 @@ both running applications, and in the history server.
The endpoints are mounted
for the histor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13409
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62200/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13409
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13409
**[Test build #62200 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62200/consoleFull)**
for PR 13409 at commit
[`50977da`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
**[Test build #62201 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62201/consoleFull)**
for PR 14167 at commit
[`e706ca6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62201/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
**[Test build #62201 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62201/consoleFull)**
for PR 14167 at commit
[`e706ca6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62196/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
**[Test build #62196 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62196/consoleFull)**
for PR 14132 at commit
[`5c76e25`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
GitHub user mgummelt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14167
[WIP] [SPARK-16194] Mesos Driver env vars
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added new configuration namespace: spark.mesos.env.*
This allows a user submitting a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62195/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62195 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62195/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
[`3454193`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62194/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62194 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62194/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
[`55419aa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990#discussion_r70546286
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -393,3 +394,54 @@ case class CreateNamedSt
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14166
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r70545811
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -327,6 +326,32 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf) exte
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13409
**[Test build #62200 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62200/consoleFull)**
for PR 13409 at commit
[`50977da`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
GitHub user sharkdtu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14166
[MINOR][YARN] Fix code error in yarn-cluster unit test
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix code error in yarn-cluster unit test.
## How was this patch tes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
**[Test build #62199 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62199/consoleFull)**
for PR 14165 at commit
[`97f6b92`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14138
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14138
thanks, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Hi, @hvanhovell . So far, I tried in the following way for `HINT_PREFIX`.
Due to the prefix overlapping, `BRACKETED_COMMENT` seems to eat the HINT.
Could you give me some advice more?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62197/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
**[Test build #62197 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62197/consoleFull)**
for PR 14165 at commit
[`4309100`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
**[Test build #62197 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62197/consoleFull)**
for PR 14165 at commit
[`4309100`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
**[Test build #62198 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62198/consoleFull)**
for PR 14132 at commit
[`61e4b1b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
[SPARK-16503] SparkSession should provide Spark version
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds the following to SparkSession:
```scala
/** The versi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Now, only minor `HINT_PREFIX` remains.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62191/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62191 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62191/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
[`2453e21`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
> If its the leveldb file not being created, that should be fixed by
aab99d3
That's great, and in my view that also means that any failure in the
startup of the shuffle service should actua
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
I'd be curious if you find out what was wrong with that node.
If its the leveldb file not being created, that should be fixed by
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/aab99d31a927adfa921
Github user nblintao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
Thanks, @ajbozarth. That's a great point. When no execution in a table has
SQL text, this column shouldn't be shown. I'll fix this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14152#discussion_r70541473
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/Checkpoint.scala ---
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
package org.apache.spark.streaming
import j
Github user nblintao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158#discussion_r70541399
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/AllExecutionsPage.scala
---
@@ -103,6 +104,9 @@ private[ui] abstract class ExecutionTab
Github user avulanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
@JeremyNixon Thanks for the comprehensive list of references!
The internal API of Spark ANN is designed to be flexible and can handle
different types of layers. However, only a part of the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
**[Test build #62196 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62196/consoleFull)**
for PR 14132 at commit
[`5c76e25`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
So far, I couldn't do the following two advices. I just inform you that I'm
still working these. :)
- `HINT_PREFIX`
- `| hintName=identifier '(' parameters+=identifier parameters+=
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14147
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62193/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14147
**[Test build #62193 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62193/consoleFull)**
for PR 14147 at commit
[`8f5fb63`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14147
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62195 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62195/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
[`3454193`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14161
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62189/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14161
**[Test build #62189 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62189/consoleFull)**
for PR 14161 at commit
[`e2b2edf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14161
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
@kishorvpatil thanks, I'll check it out
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62194 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62194/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
[`55419aa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
@ajbozarth, I have fixed the issue with safari exception. Its because
`parser.baseURI` is `null`. I switched to `document.baseURI`. It looks fine on
testing. Let me know if you still see this i
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
Checked it out and gave it a test run and it looks good, just one issue.
When the user only uses the dataframes api it will never show any SQL Text
(only "-"), should we check if there is no SQL T
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14164
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user damnMeddlingKid opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14164
Allow comparisons between UDTs and Datatypes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently UDTs can not be compared to Datatypes even if their sqlTypes
match. this leads
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62192/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119
**[Test build #62192 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62192/consoleFull)**
for PR 14119 at commit
[`7451fc7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
Some more info: you're correct in that, int this case, the application
eventually fails because containers keep getting started on the "bad" node.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14163
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user Sherry302 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14163
[SPARK-15923][YARN] Spark Application rest api returns 'no such app: â¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update monitoring.md.
â¦'
You can merge this pull reques
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14147
**[Test build #62193 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62193/consoleFull)**
for PR 14147 at commit
[`8f5fb63`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user aokolnychyi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119
**Summary of the updates**
- `JavaSparkSQL.java` file was removed. I kept it initially since the file
itself was quite old (2+ years) and it was present in your original WIP branch
alon
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14119
**[Test build #62192 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62192/consoleFull)**
for PR 14119 at commit
[`7451fc7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34
**[Test build #48 has
finished](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/48/consoleFull)**
for PR 34 at commit
[`30bda81`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14162
I'm trying to get access to more information about the original issue to
answer all the questions; I know it was caused because for some reason the YARN
"local-dirs" were all read only, and the level
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670
**[Test build #62191 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62191/consoleFull)**
for PR 13670 at commit
[`2453e21`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34
**[Test build #48 has
started](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/48/consoleFull)**
for PR 34 at commit
[`30bda81`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/30
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14160
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14160
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62188/
Test PASSed.
---
101 - 200 of 555 matches
Mail list logo
