Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20456
**[Test build #86880 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86880/testReport)**
for PR 20456 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/436/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19340
@zhengruifeng yes I understand why the solutions aren't the same, though it
depends on whether you think that's what k-_means_ is supposed to do or not.
We're not actually maximizing an expectation
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20419
**[Test build #86882 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86882/testReport)**
for PR 20419 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20164
I might be missing something, but the user sets the raw prediction col
name. Now it's going to use a different name than what the user set.
Isn't it simply an error to apply a second model,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20456
**[Test build #86881 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86881/testReport)**
for PR 20456 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20456
**[Test build #86880 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86880/testReport)**
for PR 20456 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20456
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user xubo245 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20456
@gatorsmile please review it.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
GitHub user xubo245 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20456
[SPARK-22624][PYSPARK] Expose range partitioning shuffle introduced by
spark-22614
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Expose range partitioning shuffle introduced
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20455
Once map support is added later, we should also document `getMap`'s
behavior.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20455
**[Test build #86878 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86878/testReport)**
for PR 20455 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
**[Test build #86879 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86879/testReport)**
for PR 20435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/435/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20455
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/434/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20455
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user advancedxy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20449#discussion_r165066153
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/BlockStoreShuffleReader.scala ---
@@ -104,9 +104,18 @@ private[spark] class
Github user IgorBerman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11207
@bbossy thanks. I'm experiencing them too despite the merged PR. I think I
have some direction why it fails, here is my setup:
0. v2.2.0
1. Dynamic allocation is on
2. min executors
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
**[Test build #86877 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86877/testReport)**
for PR 20454 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20455
[SPARK-23284][SQL] Document several get API of ColumnVector's behavior when
accessing null slot
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For some ColumnVector get APIs such as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/433/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r165055237
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamingRelation.scala
---
@@ -75,6 +76,52 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
**[Test build #86875 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86875/testReport)**
for PR 20454 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86875/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/432/
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20449
cc @jiangxb1987
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20449#discussion_r165051362
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/BlockStoreShuffleReader.scala ---
@@ -104,9 +104,18 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
**[Test build #86875 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86875/testReport)**
for PR 20454 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20448
**[Test build #86876 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86876/testReport)**
for PR 20448 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20448
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/431/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20448
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20448#discussion_r165049675
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/DataSourceV2Relation.scala
---
@@ -17,36 +17,84 @@
package
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20448
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20448
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86867/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20448
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435#discussion_r165048049
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/MicroBatchExecution.scala
---
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ class MicroBatchExecution(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20448
**[Test build #86867 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86867/testReport)**
for PR 20448 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20452
**[Test build #86874 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86874/testReport)**
for PR 20452 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/430/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20452
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20452
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/429/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435#discussion_r165047744
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceOffset.scala
---
@@ -20,14 +20,15 @@ package
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20435
**[Test build #86873 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86873/testReport)**
for PR 20435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86871/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
**[Test build #86871 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86871/testReport)**
for PR 20454 at commit
Github user gengliangwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
@cloud-fan @jose-torres @rdblue
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gengliangwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20386
@rdblue @cloud-fan @jose-torres thanks for the comments!
I was trying to make the API compatible with `onTaskCommit(taskCommit:
TaskCommitMessage)` in `FileCommitProtocol` possible.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
**[Test build #86871 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86871/testReport)**
for PR 20454 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20450
**[Test build #86872 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86872/testReport)**
for PR 20450 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20450
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/428/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20450
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/427/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user gengliangwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20454
[SPARK-23202][SQL] Add new DataSourceWriter API: onDataWriterCommit
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the api
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20452
Overall LGTM. One question is, at #19980, we replace `anyNullsSet` with
some predicate of `numNulls` (like `numNulls == 0` or `numNulls` > 0) in many
places, shall we use `hasNull` now for those
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86870/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453
**[Test build #86870 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86870/testReport)**
for PR 20453 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20404
Thanks all for your review, greatly appreciated.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user bbossy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11207
@IgorBerman correct, #11272 was a follow up on this and got merged. I still
experience issues with the shuffle service on Mesos, but I haven't been able to
pin point the cause.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20452
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86869/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20452
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20452
**[Test build #86869 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86869/testReport)**
for PR 20452 at commit
Github user advancedxy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20449
ping @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20450
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86868/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20450
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20450
**[Test build #86868 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86868/testReport)**
for PR 20450 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20404
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20404
Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19340
@zhengruifeng I agree with you, but then we can also normalize the center
points
Github user IgorBerman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11207
Hi @bbossy
just to make sure this PR wasn't merged in favor to
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11272?
---
-
To
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20404
I completely agree with @HyukjinKwon.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20404
How about you @ueshin?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20404
I am fine with not fixing the case here for now if we go for it only with
master branch. Maybe, we can try to fix the pre existing issue too seperately
by syncrhoziing everything if anyone
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20452
LGTM, and the name `hasNull` sounds fine to me, too.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20450#discussion_r164997996
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -761,6 +761,43 @@ class ColumnarBatchSuite
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20437#discussion_r164997663
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ class FileInputDStream[K, V, F <:
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20437#discussion_r164996836
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ class FileInputDStream[K, V, F
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20404
Thanks Felix. I would incline to not fix the case mentioned by Felix.
What's your opinion @HyukjinKwon @ueshin ?
---
-
To
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20450#discussion_r164996133
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -761,6 +761,43 @@ class ColumnarBatchSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453
**[Test build #86870 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86870/testReport)**
for PR 20453 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20450#discussion_r164995018
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -761,6 +761,43 @@ class ColumnarBatchSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/426/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user dilipbiswal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20453
[SPARK-23281][SQL] Query produces results in incorrect order when a
composite order by clause refers to both original columns and aliases
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20450#discussion_r164993656
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -761,6 +761,43 @@ class ColumnarBatchSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20452
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/425/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20452
**[Test build #86869 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86869/testReport)**
for PR 20452 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20452
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20404
Itâs your call - there are some risks but seems like there are pre
existing code that has the same problem.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20452
cc @kiszk @ueshin @viirya
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20452
revert [SPARK-22785][SQL] remove ColumnVector.anyNullsSet
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19980 , we thought `anyNullsSet`
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20450#discussion_r164986589
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -761,6 +761,43 @@ class ColumnarBatchSuite
501 - 600 of 624 matches
Mail list logo
