Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22460
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22471#discussion_r219024051
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -2274,33 +2274,41 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22482
**[Test build #96321 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96321/testReport)**
for PR 22482 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22482
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96321/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22482
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22462
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22448
@cloud-fan does this look okay now ?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22448#discussion_r219018069
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -89,10 +90,10 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22448#discussion_r219018725
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -106,6 +107,22 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22469
thanks, merging to master/2.4!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22479
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22465
thanks, merging to master!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22465
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22462#discussion_r219016643
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/sources/StreamingDataSourceV2Suite.scala
---
@@ -204,6 +249,37 @@ class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22469
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22448#discussion_r219018635
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -89,10 +90,10 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22173
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96283/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22173
**[Test build #96283 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96283/testReport)**
for PR 22173 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22173
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22138
**[Test build #96300 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96300/testReport)**
for PR 22138 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22462#discussion_r219020125
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/sources/StreamingDataSourceV2Suite.scala
---
@@ -204,6 +249,37 @@ class
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22460
> To speed things up might be worth it to hack run-test.py to only run core
tests (or DistributedSuite).
when running it manually on the amplab workers, it seems to be way more
common if I
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22460
**[Test build #96313 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96313/testReport)**
for PR 22460 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22460
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22480
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22480
**[Test build #96319 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96319/testReport)**
for PR 22480 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22408#discussion_r219028470
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1879,6 +1879,80 @@ working with timestamps in `pandas_udf`s to get the
best performance, see
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22480
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96319/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22480
cc @gatorsmile and @cloud-fan FYI
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22460
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22460
**[Test build #96313 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96313/testReport)**
for PR 22460 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22173
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22460
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96313/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22443
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22443
I see, @cloud-fan .
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22408#discussion_r219037301
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1879,6 +1879,66 @@ working with timestamps in `pandas_udf`s to get the
best performance, see
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22482
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96323/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22482
**[Test build #96323 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96323/testReport)**
for PR 22482 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22482
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22408#discussion_r219039607
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -735,6 +735,60 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22358
**[Test build #96312 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96312/testReport)**
for PR 22358 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22358
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22358
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96312/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22460
To speed things up might be worth it to hack run-test.py to only run core
tests (or DistributedSuite).
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22471
@mn-mikke As you pointed out, I think we need to fix`Reverse`, too. Do you
have time to do?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22471#discussion_r219020611
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -2274,33 +2274,41 @@ case class
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22471#discussion_r219020659
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -2274,33 +2274,41 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22473
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22473
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96303/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22480
**[Test build #96319 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96319/testReport)**
for PR 22480 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22358
@srowen and @vanxin WDYT?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22455#discussion_r219030350
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -450,6 +450,42 @@ print(model.summaries)
{% endhighlight %}
+### Eager execution
+
+If the
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22455#discussion_r219030512
--- Diff: R/pkg/tests/fulltests/test_eager_execution.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22455#discussion_r219030211
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -450,6 +450,42 @@ print(model.summaries)
{% endhighlight %}
+### Eager execution
+
+If the
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22455#discussion_r219030277
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -450,6 +450,42 @@ print(model.summaries)
{% endhighlight %}
+### Eager execution
+
+If the
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22455#discussion_r219030775
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -244,11 +244,15 @@ setMethod("showDF",
#' @note show(SparkDataFrame) since 1.4.0
setMethod("show",
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22173
**[Test build #96307 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96307/testReport)**
for PR 22173 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22475
Thanks! Merged to master/2.4
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22173
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96307/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22408
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22482
The patch is a bit huge, so I'm not sure we would be better to squash
commits into one before reviewing.
Two TODOs are left hence marking the patch as WIP, but closer to be a
complete
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22408
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22408#discussion_r219037194
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1879,6 +1879,66 @@ working with timestamps in `pandas_udf`s to get the
best performance, see
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22408#discussion_r219037086
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1879,6 +1879,66 @@ working with timestamps in `pandas_udf`s to get the
best performance, see
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22464
@viirya Thanks for doing it! To ease the review, can you revert these 4
commits sequentially with `git revert commit-hash`? Thanks!
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22344
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22408
Since it's a little risky to backport
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22448 , I'd like to merge this PR without
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22448 . Can you fix the conflict? thanks!
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22448#discussion_r219019347
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercionSuite.scala
---
@@ -366,7 +366,29 @@ class TypeCoercionSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22408#discussion_r219019453
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1879,6 +1879,80 @@ working with timestamps in `pandas_udf`s to get the
best performance, see
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22464
@cloud-fan Ok. Let me try it.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22471#discussion_r219020866
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -2274,33 +2274,41 @@ case class
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22471
LGTM except for the minor comments
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22325
**[Test build #96315 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96315/testReport)**
for PR 22325 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22480
[SPARK-25473][PYTHON][SS][TEST] ForeachWriter tests failed on Python 3.6
and macOS High Serria
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR does not fix the problem
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22464
@cloud-fan Shall we have 4 PRs to revert these PRs individually?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22478
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96308/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22447
**[Test build #4343 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4343/testReport)**
for PR 22447 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22173
**[Test build #96294 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96294/testReport)**
for PR 22173 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22173
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96294/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22478
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22173
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22462#discussion_r219028235
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/sources/StreamingDataSourceV2Suite.scala
---
@@ -143,15 +185,18 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22482
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22482
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22482
**[Test build #96323 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96323/testReport)**
for PR 22482 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22408#discussion_r219038798
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -735,6 +735,60 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22466
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22466
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22355
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22462#discussion_r218774367
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/MicroBatchExecution.scala
---
@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ class MicroBatchExecution(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22461
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22462
**[Test build #96247 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96247/testReport)**
for PR 22462 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22461
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96228/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22355
Thanks for the merging!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22138#discussion_r218777053
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/InternalKafkaConsumerPool.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19810
If the author is inactive, its ok to take this over by someone. But, we
should first discuss more to get consensus for this feature. I'm not sure we
could get enough performance gains at the expense
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20761
**[Test build #96246 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/96246/testReport)**
for PR 20761 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20761
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22461
Ah, you mean linking this PR to the JIRA? looks some problems are going on.
I asked this to dev mailing list. This happened before
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22468
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22468
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
401 - 500 of 919 matches
Mail list logo
